Unit Errata (compilation)

Post bug reports and ask for tech support here.

Moderator: alexs

Post Reply
Capitaine
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 10:00 am

Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by Capitaine »

The 503 Panzer states it is comprised of "(Mk VI)", but the silhouette shows a Panther Mk V.
User avatar
Adam Parker
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:05 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

RE: Unit Errata

Post by Adam Parker »

Someone I think picked that up replying to an AAR here long before release. Surprised not fixed.
Miller Logan
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Dallas, TX

RE: Unit Errata

Post by Miller Logan »

1st SS Panzerjager shows as JgVI with a silhouette of an Elefant but was not equipped with them as I recall.
Capitaine
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Unit Errata

Post by Capitaine »

Also, in TAO, 519 s.PanzerJager (JgV/JgIV) is shown w/ a JgVI silhouette.
Capitaine
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Unit Errata

Post by Capitaine »

Another in TAO, this time "von der Heydte" is misspelled ("Heyte").
Ron
Posts: 499
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 2:46 am

RE: Unit Errata

Post by Ron »

A couple more small quibbles from the Overlord Campaign, both the 654 and 658 PanzerJager (JgV - JagdPanther) have silhouettes of a Jagdpanzer IV.
User avatar
alexs
Posts: 417
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 3:54 pm
Location: Sydney
Contact:

RE: Unit Errata

Post by alexs »

Guys,
All of these have been noted and will be looked into.

AlexS
Txema
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: Basque Country

RE: Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by Txema »

- The 503 Schwere Panzer battalion had Tigers and King Tigers. Actually it was the only unit equiped with King Tigers in Normandy. So it should include "(MkVI/MkVIB)" in its name, and the silhouette of a King Tiger.

- The 1st SS Panzerjager battalion had only StuG III assault guns. So it should include "(StuGIII)" in its name,and the silhouette of a StuG III.

- As it has been previously pointed out, the 654 Schwere PanzerJager battalion had JagdPanzer V tank destroyers. So it should include "(JgV)" in its name and the silhouette of a Jagdpanzer V. It seems that the silhouette of the Jagdpanzer V is not available in the "Battles in Normandy" folder. On the other hand, the silhouette of the Elefant is available. AFAIK, there were NO Elefants in Normandy, so the silhouette of the Jagdpanzer V should be included instead of that of the Elefant.

- The 22 Panzer Regiment (belonging to the 21 Panzer division) had mainly Panzer IV tanks. It included also some Panzer III tanks and some old Somua French tanks. So it should include "(MkIV)" in its name and the silhouette of a Panzer IV tank. The Panzer IV tanks were available on D-Day, and the unit actually counter-attacked using them on D-Day afternoon. So the current representation on the "Overlord" scenario where the "22 Panzer" starts with "38t" tanks, and is later upgraded to "MkIV/MkV" tanks around turn 20, is erroneous. That unit never had Panzer V tanks (at least in Normandy), and it started D-day with its Panzer IV tanks available.


These data can be found in the book "Panzers in Normandy: Then and Now", for example, and they have been corroborated with other books.


To finish, let me make a little suggestion: I have seen that you are using the "British" names to designate the german tanks (MkIV, MkV). Why don´t you use the "German" names for them (PzIV, PzV for example)? I think they would be much more adequate. In the same way I would like to see the name of the main combat vehicles in all the units that have them (including for example the recon units). Is it possible to implement my suggestions?

Thank you very much for your help !!!


Txema
Capitaine
Posts: 1028
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by Capitaine »

Txema, there's definitely a JgPzV silhouette in TAO4, so there should definitely be one available for BIN. They just need to get these things straight if they're going to use the silhouettes at all (i.e., they should be meaningful).
Txema
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri May 09, 2003 2:00 pm
Location: Basque Country

RE: Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by Txema »

Here you have an EXCELLENT on-line resource on the German OOB in Normandy.

http://w1.183.telia.com/~u18313395/normandy/index.html

The author has recently published a book about the topic.

Developers, please, check the information in this site to fix the errors present in the OOB.

Thanks !!!


Txema
Black Cat
Posts: 604
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2002 6:46 pm

RE: Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by Black Cat »

Great Link there.

Thanks !
RobertRasmussen
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2004 9:41 pm

RE: Unit Errata (compilation)

Post by RobertRasmussen »

I noticed that the German 319 infantry division is part of the German setup in the Overlord scenario. Wasn't this unit located on the Channel Islands and never made it to Normandy?

Robert
Post Reply

Return to “Battles In Normandy Support”