1.3 and ground combat

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
BossGnome
Posts: 658
Joined: Sat May 29, 2004 12:13 am
Location: Canada

1.3 and ground combat

Post by BossGnome »

i heard somewhere it would be totally different...how different? and how is it going to work? does anybody know oor is this just a matrix-enduced rumour?
"Hard pressed on my right; my left is in retreat. My center is yielding. Impossible to maneuver. Situation excellent. I am attacking."
-Gen. Joffre, before the battle of the Marne
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by DrewMatrix »

It is going to be different. Being different, people will have very strong opinions about it. It is definitely going to generate lots of discussion on the Banter Boards.

Some people will say it is better, but some will say it is worse than before.

Both opinions will draw enormous fire from people who have still different opinions.
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
User avatar
BRZ
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: Rio de Janeiro, RJ

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by BRZ »

It appears that zone of control will make its entrance in game.
User avatar
2Stepper
Posts: 950
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2003 11:16 pm
Location: North Burbs of Omaha
Contact:

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by 2Stepper »

ORIGINAL: BRZ

It appears that zone of control will make its entrance in game.

ZOC has a play in the game now, though just not as severe. From what I've observed, if a unit has no valid retreat route OUT of the ZOC of the unit attacking it, it dies... Either way, an "adjusted" method should prove interesting.
Image
"Send in the Infantry. Tanks cost money... the dead cost nothing..." :)
Tophat
Posts: 459
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:07 am
Location: Cleveland,Ohio

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Tophat »

Can we get an example here from a playtester?
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

Here you go. This pic is with the ZOC's displayed using the 'W' key. No supply can pass through an enemy controlled hex or even one that is co-owned. An actual LCU doesn't need to be in the hex to retain control though in this example i do so as to ensure the AI cant relieve it's trapped forces. [:D]

Image
Attachments
crap.jpg
crap.jpg (41.87 KiB) Viewed 343 times
User avatar
freeboy
Posts: 8969
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by freeboy »

It is going to be different. Being different, people will have very strong opinions about it. It is definitely going to generate lots of discussion on the Banter Boards.
Could you please direct me to the banter boards?
"Tanks forward"
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by tsimmonds »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Here you go. This pic is with the ZOC's displayed using the 'W' key. No supply can pass through an enemy controlled hex or even one that is co-owned. An actual LCU doesn't need to be in the hex to retain control though in this example i do so as to ensure the AI cant relieve it's trapped forces. [:D]
Interesting. How long does a friendly ZOC persist in an unoccupied hex? Until an enemy unit enters the hex?
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

yes.
Zorfwaddle
Posts: 263
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Pensacola, FL

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Zorfwaddle »

Im playing 1.21 and Im somewhere in Jan 42 (I can only get in a few turns a week). Some BAJD[1] was chasing a few base units up the Malaysian Penisula into Burma about 3 weeks ago and so I had the bright idea to try to trap it with some of the brigades from Rangoon and Taung Gyi. He got trapped. It looked like he could not go farther south due to some ZOC effect. In fact it looks like they are sending another heavy-looking division up there to try to bail him out. Meanwhile, Im rushing a few more brigades at what-not down to see if I can get both of them. Should be fun.

Forgot this

[1] Bad Ass Japanese Division
"AK-47. When you absolutely, positively got to kill every m****rf****r in the room. Accept no substitutes." Ordell Robbie - "Jackie Brown"
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by pad152 »

Here you go. This pic is with the ZOC's displayed using the 'W' key. No supply can pass through an enemy controlled hex or even one that is co-owned. An actual LCU doesn't need to be in the hex to retain control though in this example i do so as to ensure the AI cant relieve it's trapped forces

This is all well and good, but can the AI handle this?[&:]

Playing as allies all I have to do is wait for the Japanese to march in Rangoon, cut off their supply line, bomb the crap out of them and wait for them to die! I've done this already with version 1.2X, it sounds like this will even be easier with version 1.3? [:-]

Is the AI for land units new and improved?
pad152
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2000 8:00 am

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by pad152 »

Hey Nikademus

What's with all of the A/J's on the map picture? Do these show the ZOC?

It sounds like we need some indication to show what units are cut-off!
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: pad152

This is all well and good, but can the AI handle this?[&:]

Playing as allies all I have to do is wait for the Japanese to march in Rangoon, cut off their supply line, bomb the crap out of them and wait for them to die! I've done this already with version 1.2X, it sounds like this will even be easier with version 1.3? [:-]

Is the AI for land units new and improved?

The AI is improved but even before the ZOC rule it has always been somewhat easy to outflank and cut off AI led LCU's, especially on the large land masses like China
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: pad152

Hey Nikademus

What's with all of the A/J's on the map picture? Do these show the ZOC?

It sounds like we need some indication to show what units are cut-off!


Yes. A=Allied J=Japanese, an AJ in the same hex means co-ownership. You'll be able to tell if a unit is cut off fairly easily, as it needs to be able to trace a supply path back to the source point unblocked by an enemy ZOC.
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Captain Cruft »

I like this. How does if affect movement?
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Mr.Frag »

I like this. How does if affect movement?

It completely prevents the current hopping of units where supply gets traced out the wrong way and units get to retreat over the enemy! [;)]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

I like this. How does if affect movement?

It wont affect dedicated (i.e. player ordered) movement at all. It will however govern how the player deploys his forces. i.e. its not enough anymore to mass your LCU's on a road/supply hex or a base. More than ever now you have to watch your flanks. Out in the Pacific or in areas where the terrain is far more restrictive, the effect will be less though supply lines and their defense will be more important to protect
User avatar
Montbrun
Posts: 1506
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Montbrun »

Although an excellent expedient for WitP, ZOCs are, in reality, a function of terrain. Units on higher ground can "influence" a greater area. I've always seen ZOCs as a "grand-tactical" function - battalion/regiment scale. At the scale of WitP (60 miles/hex), there should be no ZOC effects, in say, an Eastern Front game. The ZOC effects would be contained within the hex itself....

Brad
WitE Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE Research Team
WitE2.0 Alpha/Beta Tester
WitE2.0 Research Team
WitW Alpha/Beta Tester
WitW Research Team
Piercing Fortress Europa Research Team
Desert War 1940-1942 Alpha/Beta Tester
User avatar
Captain Cruft
Posts: 3740
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: England

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Captain Cruft »

OK well that all sounds good! What about moving from one enemy ZOC to another though? Any penalty or restriction on that? Or moving through a ZOC?

A better question might be - will the changes be fully documented?
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: 1.3 and ground combat

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: Captain Cruft

OK well that all sounds good! What about moving from one enemy ZOC to another though? Any penalty or restriction on that? Or moving through a ZOC?

A better question might be - will the changes be fully documented?

No penalty in giving movement orders or in accumulating movement points. The "penalty" or better termed "restriction" is that no supply path can be traced through an enemy ZOC (enemy controlled hex). This includes a co-owned hex....i.e. if you have a hex occupied by both sides, a supply path can be traced into the contested hex by both parties but supply will not pass through for either so LCU's of both parties on the wrong side of the hex (in terms of supply tracing) will not be supplied.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”