Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Empires in Arms is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. Empires in Arms is a seven player game of grand strategy set during the Napoleonic period of 1805-1815. The unit scale is corps level with full diplomatic options

Moderator: MOD_EIA

Post Reply
User avatar
tabpub
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2003 8:32 am
Location: The Greater Chicagoland Area

Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Post by tabpub »

First off, I have only played this game 2-3 times and that was years ago (difficult to find the players/time/space) If I make any incorrect statements, etc, please bear with me.

I was always amused by the matrix for the CRT. Everyone picks their chit and then cross indexs the resultant columns, which lends itself toward the "analysis"; "Ack, this doesn't look good for our side today!", much like the debate going on in the Commit the Guard thread. I was thinking of what would have happened in history if EIA combat was like real life. It might go something like this.................

The Lines of the Torres Verdes...Marmont I believe was commanding..or was it Massena? Anyhow...

Aide - "General, it is wise to stay here to besiege the British/Portuguese with no depot near?"
General M - "Yes, this is a forage 3 space. I am willing to take the risk."

Later on, walking down the road to Madrid...
Aide - "You know, I have never seen ANYONE roll so MANY sixes in my life...."
Gen. M - "Shaddup."


Or, there is Borodino, of course.....

Napoleon - "No! I shall not commit the Guard! They are my last reserve! We are 1000 miles inside Russia!"

Berthier - "But Sire! Our analysis of the combat so far indicates that a Level 2 commitment of the Imperial Guard will GUARANTEE that the Russians will break! And with our current Cavalry superiority, we should achieve TOTAL victory! Worth at least 12 PP!"

Napoleon - "Oh? Really? Well, when you put it that way....COMMIT THE GUARD!!"


Last one ----- take any of times that Napoleon divided his forces to fight the enemy, usually Davout, as I recall...

Austerlitz 1805

Berthier - "Sire, isn't it a bit dangerous, what you intend to do here?"

Napoleon - "For a normal commander, it might be; but, with my strategic rating and the stupid chit pull by Charles, we have them now! I am a '5' leader! Davout and his troops will automatically arrive in round 2 and we will crush them on the 5-1 chart! I am brilliant!


Please, feel free to come up with some others....
Sing to the tune of "Man on the Flying Trapeze"
..Oh! We fly o'er the treetops with inches to spare,
There's smoke in the cockpit and gray in my hair.
The tracers look fine as a strafin' we go.
But, brother, we're TOO God damn low...
User avatar
Pippin
Posts: 652
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2002 8:54 pm

RE: Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Post by Pippin »

LMAO!
Nelson stood on deck and observed as the last of the Spanish fleets sank below the waves…
Image
User avatar
ktotwf
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2004 6:47 am

RE: Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Post by ktotwf »

Funny! Especially the Austerlitz one.
"Just because you can argue better doesn't make you right."
User avatar
1LTRambo
Posts: 313
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 10:45 pm

RE: Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Post by 1LTRambo »

That is just too funny!!!![:D][:D][:D] Now, could you imagine using that type of battle logic in the current war in Iraq?[;)]
Matthew T. Rambo
Forward_March
Posts: 160
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 5:40 am

RE: Historical battles and how they would be represented in EIA...

Post by Forward_March »

Very Funny!

BTW, it was Massena in command at Torres Verdes. Poor buggar had to deal with a recalcitrant Ney, and an unco-operative Reynier...but he always had a mistress handy:)

Marmont was to receive his shellacking from Old Nosey, later.
Post Reply

Return to “Empires in Arms the Napoleonic Wars of 1805 - 1815”