Lack of warning in Witp

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
Knaust
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Rivoli ITALY

Lack of warning in Witp

Post by Knaust »

Consider that playing a long scenario will take at least 4-5 years (at the pace of 1 turn/day)...
consider that many guys are waiting for patch 1.3 before starting a game...
So I say:
It would be fair to warn customers before buying this game:
THIS GAME IS NOT FOR OVER 60s!

btw..I'm 64...methinks I'm the oldest in this forum

Moreover..what about computer obsolescence?...maybe in the next 4 years Microsoft will change NTFS file system again[:'(]
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by tsimmonds »

Moreover..what about computer obsolescence?...maybe in the next 4 years Microsoft will change NTFS file system again

All that means is you buy yourself a new machine and keep the current one unupgraded as a dedicated WitP platform....[;)]
Fear the kitten!
Knaust
Posts: 176
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Rivoli ITALY

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by Knaust »

[8D]
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by pasternakski »

Good advice, Knaust...

I have an additional concern nagging in the back of my mind (and no, it's not the old lady, either). As we approach patch 1.30 and anticipate 1.40, I realize that just about all the long campaign scenario problems that have been identified and fixed have arisen through experience with playing the first six months or so of the game. What dangers lurk as we play our way through the end of 1943 into 1944 and on toward 1945? We may be in a position of having played this thing for most of our second childhood and suddenly find ourselves right back in the position we are now - suspending play pending a patch and deciding to restart ...

I am 56. I suspect that I will be thoroughly senile before I get to drop my first A-bomb.

Image
Attachments
grumble, mumble.jpg
grumble, mumble.jpg (9.94 KiB) Viewed 241 times
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
LittleJoe
Posts: 610
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2004 1:22 pm

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by LittleJoe »

Good point, maybe we shouldnt be playing Scen 15 until the last patch [&:]

Maybe not... Lol
Image
Xargun
Posts: 4396
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2004 11:34 pm
Location: Near Columbus, Ohio
Contact:

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by Xargun »

ORIGINAL: pasternakski

Good advice, Knaust...

I have an additional concern nagging in the back of my mind (and no, it's not the old lady, either). As we approach patch 1.30 and anticipate 1.40, I realize that just about all the long campaign scenario problems that have been identified and fixed have arisen through experience with playing the first six months or so of the game. What dangers lurk as we play our way through the end of 1943 into 1944 and on toward 1945? We may be in a position of having played this thing for most of our second childhood and suddenly find ourselves right back in the position we are now - suspending play pending a patch and deciding to restart ...

I am 56. I suspect that I will be thoroughly senile before I get to drop my first A-bomb.

True. I am not sure how much testing the later stages on the game have had. BUT, IMO the game is truely playable right now and the 1.3 patch is getting rid of some of the worst bugs.. So when you get into 44 and encounter a bug the game will most likely still be playable, but you and your opponent may have to make a quick house rule to fix the bug. I would not worry about it.. Besides by then you will have had a year of enjoyment out of the game and a new understanding of it - no matter how much you think you understand now...

So, I for one am not worried about it.. I would love to play a game into 44 without a restart and hopefully after 1.3 I can...

Xargun
User avatar
pasternakski
Posts: 5567
Joined: Sat Jun 29, 2002 7:42 pm

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by pasternakski »

Well, I'm keeping my fingers crossed and hoping for the best.
Put my faith in the people
And the people let me down.
So, I turned the other way,
And I carry on anyhow.
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by pompack »

ORIGINAL: Knaust


btw..I'm 64...methinks I'm the oldest in this forum

[:'(]

Yes; this means the CobraAus is now second oldest at 62. I am way down the list at 60.
User avatar
CMDRMCTOAST
Posts: 673
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 6:34 am
Location: Mount Vernon wa..

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by CMDRMCTOAST »

ORIGINAL: Knaust

Consider that playing a long scenario will take at least 4-5 years (at the pace of 1 turn/day)...
consider that many guys are waiting for patch 1.3 before starting a game...
So I say:
It would be fair to warn customers before buying this game:
THIS GAME IS NOT FOR OVER 60s!

btw..I'm 64...methinks I'm the oldest in this forum

Moreover..what about computer obsolescence?...maybe in the next 4 years Microsoft will change NTFS file system again[:'(]

Just cause your old will not get you a reprieve from my allied war machine.[:D]
We can start a 2 day turn game after the patch and that will cut the time in half
giving you a chance to play another 4 - 8 campaigns .[;)]
The essence of military genius is to bring under
consideration all of the tendencies of the mind
and soul in combination towards the business of
war..... Karl von Clausewitz
User avatar
afspret
Posts: 857
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2004 9:05 pm
Location: Hanahan, SC

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by afspret »

lets see, 7 Dec 41 to 31 Mar 46 is about 53 months, or 19321 days. if i play 5 turns a day it should take me about 3864 days to finish. That means a lot of and ,not to mention a lot of , not much [>:] and probably a lot less !
John E. McCallum
Hammer2001
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:36 pm

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by Hammer2001 »

After playing scenary 15 until march 1942, I realized that I should start one of the 1943 or 44 campaings too. Now I am even thinking of start one campaing for each year... well... it could be too much.
User avatar
steveh11Matrix
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 8:54 am
Contact:

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by steveh11Matrix »

I am 56. I suspect that I will be thoroughly senile before I get to drop my first A-bomb.
[:D]True to real life, then!
"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci
Banquet
Posts: 1190
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2002 9:04 pm
Location: England

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by Banquet »

ORIGINAL: afspret

lets see, 7 Dec 41 to 31 Mar 46 is about 53 months, or 19321 days.

53 months is 19321 days? Man, it must be a long time in between your pay cheques [:D]
hithere
Posts: 432
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 7:52 pm
Location: Atlanta

RE: Lack of warning in Witp

Post by hithere »

ORIGINAL: Banquet
ORIGINAL: afspret

lets see, 7 Dec 41 to 31 Mar 46 is about 53 months, or 19321 days.

53 months is 19321 days? Man, it must be a long time in between your pay cheques [:D]

I would sure be great for weekends too....but I come up with appx 51 months and appx 1524 days....keep in mind that i did not count leap year (does the game?) and a avg of 30 days a month.
Quote from one of my drill sergeants, "remember, except for the extreme heat, intense radiation, and powerful blast wave, a nuclear explosion is just like any other explosion"
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”