A General Discussion
Moderator: maddog986
RE: A General Discussion
Rick, have you tried checking the percentage of system resources that is being used when you run the game? Also, I seem to remember a particular dll (or lack of such) that caused problems for some users. What was it, guys, a vid.smk or something like that? With the engine for SPWaW being so dated, it requires some older system files that newer games don't need. Could I be on the right track here?

RE: A General Discussion
ORIGINAL: RBWhite
Kevinugly
Thanks for the responce.
I trying to find out what would make my machine different from those who say they are basicly running the same machine configuration as me.
Rick White
I'll give you my system specs.
AMD Athlon XP3200 cpu
Asus A7N8X Mobo
512Mb RAM
NVidia 5900GT Graphics
Soundblaster Audigy soundcard
All running XP Pro and 98se on a dual boot system.
Thankyou for using the World Wide Web. British designed, given freely to the World.
RE: A General Discussion
Goblin
I downloaded the original SPWAW 8.20 zip file from each of the sites used by Matrix for distribution same results from each download.
Does anyone have a problem trying to uninstall SPWAW 8.20 or 8.30, I have to run uninstall twice.
Rick White
I downloaded the original SPWAW 8.20 zip file from each of the sites used by Matrix for distribution same results from each download.
Does anyone have a problem trying to uninstall SPWAW 8.20 or 8.30, I have to run uninstall twice.
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
Kevinugly
I'm wondering if the SPWAW 8.0 - 8.30 programs has a problem with pentium 4 processors or hyper threading or both.
I ran SPWAW on a machine I put together from spare parts and used a AMD 550 processor and a Nvidia driver based video card and it worked fine.
Rick White
I'm wondering if the SPWAW 8.0 - 8.30 programs has a problem with pentium 4 processors or hyper threading or both.
I ran SPWAW on a machine I put together from spare parts and used a AMD 550 processor and a Nvidia driver based video card and it worked fine.
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
KG Erwin
I do remember vid.smk from SPWAW 7.0 & 7.1.
I didn't have any problem running it on this machine.
But I'll check it out.
Rick White
I do remember vid.smk from SPWAW 7.0 & 7.1.
I didn't have any problem running it on this machine.
But I'll check it out.
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
RB:
Its got me stumped also ?????
Chief (E7).....I wasn't a politician, if you know what I mean, passed all exams for E8 but the boards and I never seemed to make it together.
Were You NAVY ? Lifer ? Airdale ?
Its got me stumped also ?????
Chief (E7).....I wasn't a politician, if you know what I mean, passed all exams for E8 but the boards and I never seemed to make it together.
Were You NAVY ? Lifer ? Airdale ?
"God Bless America and All the Young men and women who give their all to protect Her"....chief
RE: A General Discussion
ORIGINAL: RBWhite
Kevinugly
I'm wondering if the SPWAW 8.0 - 8.30 programs has a problem with pentium 4 processors or hyper threading or both.
I ran SPWAW on a machine I put together from spare parts and used a AMD 550 processor and a Nvidia driver based video card and it worked fine.
Rick White
Could be the HT. This may not help but I installed TOAW ACOW on my XP drive and whilst it was playable it did 'lock up' from time to time. I set it to run in W98 compatibility mode and it's run smoothly ever since. I know people with similar systems to mine for whom the game runs perfectly in XP without any 'tweaking' at all. Try it (if you haven't already) and see what happens.[8D]
Thankyou for using the World Wide Web. British designed, given freely to the World.
RE: A General Discussion
Kevinugly
I had a few problems when I was running Win98 se, nothing that would cause me not to be able to play the simulation.
I tried every compatibility mode available WinXp. Nothing.
All of the problems I have with SPWAW 8.0 series are related to WinXp, Intel pentium 4 processors with hyper threading I quess and I'm presuming Nvidia based driver video cards in combination.
I do have a question about Matrix Games making a statement that refers to SPWAW 8.30 & 8.30. "Works best on Alienware". That kind of raises some red flags with me.
Thanks for the info
Rick White
I had a few problems when I was running Win98 se, nothing that would cause me not to be able to play the simulation.
I tried every compatibility mode available WinXp. Nothing.
All of the problems I have with SPWAW 8.0 series are related to WinXp, Intel pentium 4 processors with hyper threading I quess and I'm presuming Nvidia based driver video cards in combination.
I do have a question about Matrix Games making a statement that refers to SPWAW 8.30 & 8.30. "Works best on Alienware". That kind of raises some red flags with me.
Thanks for the info
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
the alienware thing is just a commercial I think. It's mentioned in every release and has not hindered me in playing any of the games (Tin Soldiers, BIN, HTTR,SPWAW).
I do have a Pentium IV system.
I do have a Pentium IV system.
GMT +1
- Hexed Gamer
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 1:31 am
RE: A General Discussion
Process of elimination.
This will seem like a painful choice, but you might want to try swapping in and out parts.
With my limited knowledge, I know that the following are all pretty much core components of a computer.
Motherboard, RAM, processor, video card, sound card, hard drive and actual OS.
Keeping in mind, that it might matter with each part (other than OS) what specific brand and model number is involved, as we all know, some brands suck some don't. Some models will have been good some won't be.
And where OS is concerned, what other actual programs do you have installed (because I sure have encountered programs that got intrusive and meddlesome with the system beyond their right and or need to do so).
Also, what updates specifixcally have you installed?
Looks like you are the challenge of the moment eh
This will seem like a painful choice, but you might want to try swapping in and out parts.
With my limited knowledge, I know that the following are all pretty much core components of a computer.
Motherboard, RAM, processor, video card, sound card, hard drive and actual OS.
Keeping in mind, that it might matter with each part (other than OS) what specific brand and model number is involved, as we all know, some brands suck some don't. Some models will have been good some won't be.
And where OS is concerned, what other actual programs do you have installed (because I sure have encountered programs that got intrusive and meddlesome with the system beyond their right and or need to do so).
Also, what updates specifixcally have you installed?
Looks like you are the challenge of the moment eh

There is only one Hexed Gamer
http://s3.invisionfree.com/Les_s_Place
http://s3.invisionfree.com/Les_s_Place
RE: A General Discussion
Chief
I Know what you mean, back then it was part of the process. It was best to be yourself.
Yes, Navy, all of 69 to all of 73, and I'l leave it at that.
Thanks for the help and info with my problem
Take care
Rick White
I Know what you mean, back then it was part of the process. It was best to be yourself.
Yes, Navy, all of 69 to all of 73, and I'l leave it at that.
Thanks for the help and info with my problem
Take care
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
Hexed Gamer
I like the way this machine that I built runs, it also is capable of some major future upgrading.
Problems with specific software is not a reason I would use to lessen my machines capabilities.
I will say this, I never had a software problem I couldn't solve, until now and I'm not finished trying, yet.
So thats not an option
Thanks
Rick White
I like the way this machine that I built runs, it also is capable of some major future upgrading.
Problems with specific software is not a reason I would use to lessen my machines capabilities.
I will say this, I never had a software problem I couldn't solve, until now and I'm not finished trying, yet.
So thats not an option
Thanks
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
Murky71
I don't know why, but that statement just bothers me.
Thanks
Rick White
I don't know why, but that statement just bothers me.
Thanks
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
KG Erwin
With everything I could possibly have running at one time including SPWAW 8.30, system resources were at 52%.
Also: I searched the SPWAW program files did not find the vid.smk dll. Are you saying I need that dll to run SPWAW 8.0 - 8.30?
Or are saying it caused alot of problems when it was used with the SPWAW series?
Rick White
With everything I could possibly have running at one time including SPWAW 8.30, system resources were at 52%.
Also: I searched the SPWAW program files did not find the vid.smk dll. Are you saying I need that dll to run SPWAW 8.0 - 8.30?
Or are saying it caused alot of problems when it was used with the SPWAW series?
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
Good luck, if/when you find a solution, let us know (even if it's 6 months down the road, although I hope you've sorted it before then[:)])
Thankyou for using the World Wide Web. British designed, given freely to the World.
RE: A General Discussion
ORIGINAL: RBWhite
I like the way this machine that I built runs
[:)]
Ray (alias Lava)
RE: A General Discussion
ORIGINAL: RBWhite
I don't know why, but that statement just bothers me.
Why? It's just an advertisement - 95% games have them, usually for Nvidia or ATi among others. If anything, Alienware is less "risky" - there's no optimisation involved, they just build very expensive top-end gaming PCs. I always found it a little ironic... if there was any publisher whose games generally DON'T need a top end gaming PC it's Matrix.
Personally (and I say this in all seriousness), I've give up. There's a point where it's just no longer constructive, and there are so many other good games you could be playing instead.
RE: A General Discussion
PROBLEM
Rick White
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
?[8|]
Theres no intentions at all plugging another developer or publisher, I stayed with Dereck Smart and BattleCruiser since 1996.
BattleCruiser Universal Combat turned out not to shabby.
I do like at times to give to others the benefit to make good, at times.
Rick White
Theres no intentions at all plugging another developer or publisher, I stayed with Dereck Smart and BattleCruiser since 1996.
BattleCruiser Universal Combat turned out not to shabby.
I do like at times to give to others the benefit to make good, at times.
Rick White
RE: A General Discussion
If I hear SP IV is going to be 3d though, get ready to be assaulted by my best verbal barrage eh.
You won't have seen anything from me from the past that would compare![]()
Well I sort of hope for a 3D isometric view, still with hexes and all, I just don't really care for that top down view, oooorrrrrr, if they could make a rotateable camara, then everone could be happy, you could have your top down view and I could have my isometric view and others could have their zoom in close view. I like "options", when you have options you can make a lot of people happy and very few sad.
WE/I WANT 1:1 or something even 1:2 death animations in the KOIOS PANZER COMMAND SERIES don't forget Erik!
and Floating Paratroopers We grew up with Minor, Marginal and Decisive victories why rock the boat with Marginal, Decisive and Legendary?
