WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
MarioF
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 6:40 pm

WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by MarioF »

I'm thinking about upgrading to Windows XP from Windows 98SE which I currently have installed. The game seems to run pretty quick during combat resolution phases, but there seems to be quite the wait during the "training ship crews" phase. Can I assume it's because of the multitude of calculations for all those ships (Modded Scen 15). - approximately 35 seconds.

What I want to know is if the game will speed up significantly running under Win XP as opposed to Win 98SE

I Currently have a AMD 2500XP processor, 512 MB of RAM, and a Radeon 8500 graphics card.

Has anyone actually upgraded from Win98SE to XP and kept the same hardware configuation as before? Was there any noticable improvement?
User avatar
BlackVoid
Posts: 639
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 11:51 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by BlackVoid »

Training ship crews is the slowest phase on my computer as well with XP.
Really does not matter for WITP if its 98 or XP.
User avatar
testarossa
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by testarossa »

ORIGINAL: MarioF

I'm thinking about upgrading to Windows XP from Windows 98SE which I currently have installed. The game seems to run pretty quick during combat resolution phases, but there seems to be quite the wait during the "training ship crews" phase. Can I assume it's because of the multitude of calculations for all those ships (Modded Scen 15). - approximately 35 seconds.

What I want to know is if the game will speed up significantly running under Win XP as opposed to Win 98SE.

I Currently have a AMD 2500XP processor, 512 MB of RAM, and a Radeon 8500 graphics card.

Has anyone actually upgraded from Win98SE to XP and kept the same hardware configuation as before? Was there any noticable improvement?

First of all Win98SE doesn't support more than 512 RAM. New drivers sometimes work worse on Win98 than on XP. XP is more demanding for resources and CPU as it runs a lot of hidden background services and essentially has NT core (read safer, more reliable but more hungry).

If you don't plan to upgrade your rig, don't bother switching to XP.

And you definately should get rid of R8500.[:'(]

Sorry forgot about training crews - it was around 1-2 sec on my Athlon 2000 XP wiht 1024 RAM. Something else is wrong with your setup i guess. After I bought AMD64-3500 it is still 1-2 secs.
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by Mr.Frag »

Very dependant on your hardware and how much tuning you are willing to do.

XP by default has everything under the sun turned on to make it look pretty. All that comes at a memory and cpu price tag.

Windows 98 will run faster then XP simply because it does nothing. [:D]

Windows XP can be tuned to a level where it can outperform 98, but only with a fair bit of work.

If you are not up to the task, expect a net slowdown overall unless you have the ram to feed to XP.
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by DrewMatrix »

If you get XP, get the professional edition, not the home edition.

I do recommend XP Pro.
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
MarioF
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 6:40 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by MarioF »

MarioF:
Can I assume it's because of the multitude of calculations for all those ships (Modded Scen 15). - approximately 35 seconds.


Sorry forgot about training crews - it was around 1-2 sec on my Athlon 2000 XP wiht 1024 RAM. Something else is wrong with your setup i guess. After I bought AMD64-3500 it is still 1-2 secs.


Wow something is Scewy on my system. It all seems to work okay for everything else. Are you sure that the 1-2 sec delay is on the big scenarios against the computer?
User avatar
dday
Posts: 64
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2004 1:48 am

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by dday »

Wow, I did have Win ME, now with new computer with Win XP (home) it great!!!!!!! Feels sorry for those still have ME, d a r n t o o s l o w !
User avatar
testarossa
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by testarossa »

I've made 4 turns measurements. It was from 3 to 9 secs. may be depends on amount of ships from both sides at sea?
User avatar
testarossa
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by testarossa »

No, read Frag's post. i have both Win98 and XP installed and W98 is a lot faster.
User avatar
steveh11Matrix
Posts: 943
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 8:54 am
Contact:

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by steveh11Matrix »

Training crews: in my experience (750MHz P3, 384MB Ram, W2000 Pro) this takes >30s for a full-map scenario. I haven't measured it, it could be >>30s.

Steve.
"Nature always obeys Her own laws" - Leonardo da Vinci
User avatar
testarossa
Posts: 958
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: WINDOWS XP or 98SE

Post by testarossa »

ORIGINAL: steveh11Matrix

Training crews: in my experience (750MHz P3, 384MB Ram, W2000 Pro) this takes >30s for a full-map scenario. I haven't measured it, it could be >>30s.

Steve.

Yea, I have AMD64-3500. So it could be CPU power factor here.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”