Best altitude for level bombers

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
tsarnicholas
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:31 pm

Best altitude for level bombers

Post by tsarnicholas »

What is the best altitdue for level bombers at attack at? The rules say that 6000 ft or higher is best, so is 6000 ft most accurate? I realise more flak will occur at lower levels.
peter
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by Mr.Frag »

Depends on the flak really.

If there is lots of flak, 15k will produce better long term results.

If not, 6k will be more effective.

I generally start high and work them down based on the damage done. Remember that the guys getting killed are the engineers, support and AA when you see losses when bombing a airfield/port.
User avatar
kaleun
Posts: 5144
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 10:57 pm
Location: Colorado

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by kaleun »

Follow up on the above question: Do Flak units recover effectiveness after being bombed? How do they do so?
Appear at places to which he must hasten; move swiftly where he does not expect you.
Sun Tzu
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by Mr.Frag »

Do Flak units recover effectiveness after being bombed? How do they do so?

If there is enough support and supply yes, but the very thing that you are hitting is the support and supplies that make this possible [;)]
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by DrewMatrix »

In general (see below) I like 6000 feet for twin engine level bombers and 11000 feet for 4 engine (as the allies).

If there is a lot of flak, as Frag says, I go higher.

If I have B-17s vs Zeros a trick is to go above the Zero's max altitude. I don't get many hits, but the Zero's can't hurt me, I don't lose planes and I gain experience.

If I have high experience (>80 say) I may set anti shipping lvl bombers to 100. Not 4 engine (too expensive). And I set them to naval attack/rest because I don't want to lose 25 B-25s to Flak if they should take on an airbase.
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
Central Blue
Posts: 695
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:31 pm

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by Central Blue »

I like flying at 1000 feet if Im hunting ships. The Dutch pilots, with their Martin bombers, seem really good at this... even if it tanks their morale. After the US and Australian bombers work out on sub patrol, they're good to go for skip bombing.
USS St. Louis firing on Guam, July 1944. The Cardinals and Browns faced each other in the World Series that year
Image
JamesM
Posts: 1026
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: QLD, Australia

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by JamesM »

Mr Frag,

Thank you for that advice. Which target optioin is the best to target supplies; airfield, port or ground units.

Ta

Jim
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Best altitude for level bombers

Post by Mr.Frag »

Airfield targets supplies, support (hq, aa, eng), airfield, airfield support (ability to repair planes)

Port targets fuel, support (hq, aa, eng, cd), port (speed of unloading), ships

Ground targets ONLY 1 ground unit, leaving all the rest unmolested.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”