Nells didn't take off...

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
invernomuto
Posts: 942
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:29 pm
Location: Turin, Italy

Nells didn't take off...

Post by invernomuto »

Hi to all,
I am trying to play the full campaign with Japan.
I have 2 Nell squadrons + Escort in Kwajalein (79,79). On 12/11/1941 I spotted the US carrier TF in (80,79), ONE hex away from my air base. I set my bombers altitude to 8000 ft and escort at 10000 ft. I left the other options unchanged.
Next turn I expected to see my bombers trying to attack the US CV, but nothing happened instead. They do not take off. Fatigue and morale of the units were ok. Any reason why?

Thanks in advance.

Bye
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22653
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: invernomuto

Hi to all,
I am trying to play the full campaign with Japan.
I have 2 Nell squadrons + Escort in Kwajalein (79,79). On 12/11/1941 I spotted the US carrier TF in (80,79), ONE hex away from my air base. I set my bombers altitude to 8000 ft and escort at 10000 ft. I left the other options unchanged.
Next turn I expected to see my bombers trying to attack the US CV, but nothing happened instead. They do not take off. Fatigue and morale of the units were ok. Any reason why?

Thanks in advance.

Bye

Some thoughts that might effect an attack:

What size is your air base at Kwaljalein?
Does in have enough supply?
Are you sure they have a Naval attack option checked?
What is the commander like (competent, incompetent, agressive?)
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by mogami »

Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.
Heavy bombers do not require escorts and bombers on CV will fly without escorts.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
Apollo11
Posts: 25187
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb, Croatia
Contact:

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by Apollo11 »

Hi all,
ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.
Heavy bombers do not require escorts and bombers on CV will fly without escorts.

Russell, you should "sticky" this - IMHO this explains 75% of all questions regarding "Why my bombers are not attacking" (the remaining 25% of cases: base too small, no HQ...)! [;)]


Leo "Apollo11"
Image

Prior Preparation & Planning Prevents Pathetically Poor Performance!

A & B: WitW, WitE, WbtS, GGWaW, GGWaW2-AWD, HttR, CotA, BftB, CF
P: UV, WitP, WitP-AE
User avatar
invernomuto
Posts: 942
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 4:29 pm
Location: Turin, Italy

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by invernomuto »

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.
Heavy bombers do not require escorts and bombers on CV will fly without escorts.

I didn't know that. Thank you very much

I come back lurking in the shadows [:D]

Bye
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by ChezDaJez »

Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.

Just curious. Not trying to ruffle feathers but why is this a requirement? An attacker wouldn't know how many enemy A/C were on CAP until he attacked.

Historically, land-based bombers were sent out in many cases without escort. Land-based VMSB-241 attacked the Japanese carrier fleet at Midway without any escort. They had launched just prior to the first Jap raid on Midway and all the US fighters were held back as CAP.

This would mean that all you have to do is place all your fighters on CAP to keep a small landbased unit from attacking. Doesn't seem like the game always follows the rules either. I've seen Dutch Martins attack KB in the SRA with only 3 or 4 Demons as escorts (especially when I'm the IJN).


Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
User avatar
Tanaka
Posts: 5126
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2003 3:42 am
Location: USA

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by Tanaka »

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez
Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.

Just curious. Not trying to ruffle feathers but why is this a requirement? An attacker wouldn't know how many enemy A/C were on CAP until he attacked.

Historically, land-based bombers were sent out in many cases without escort. Land-based VMSB-241 attacked the Japanese carrier fleet at Midway without any escort. They had launched just prior to the first Jap raid on Midway and all the US fighters were held back as CAP.

This would mean that all you have to do is place all your fighters on CAP to keep a small landbased unit from attacking. Doesn't seem like the game always follows the rules either. I've seen Dutch Martins attack KB in the SRA with only 3 or 4 Demons as escorts (especially when I'm the IJN).


Chez

I think this is mostly for the AI's benefit....
Image
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by mogami »

Hi, A TF has to be spotted before it can be targeted. The spotting unit also reports the CAP present.
It is a check. If the unit fails it's escort check it aborts. A unit still might attack without escort but low morale and leadership combined with no escort will result in not flying more often then in strike being made.
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by ChezDaJez »

Hi, A TF has to be spotted before it can be targeted. The spotting unit also reports the CAP present.

Makes sense but it does ignore the fact that most carriers IRL only kept 4-6 fighters overhead for the most part with the rest standing a ready alert on deck. Suppose that the spotter could have counted them too.

Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
Sonny
Posts: 2005
Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2002 9:51 pm

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by Sonny »

ORIGINAL: Mogami

Hi, Landbased bombers require 1 escorting fighter for every 2 enemy fighters on CAP over target. If the enemy TF has 50 CAP you need 25 escorts. If the TF has 80 CAP you need 40 escorts.
Heavy bombers do not require escorts and bombers on CV will fly without escorts.

What are heavy bombers? Two+ engines? I've seen several suicide attacks by Nells and Hudsons. Thought this had been changed by the airbal thing. Or maybe carrier TFs don't have an airbal? Anyway, 3 unescorted Nells flying into a base with airbal of 400+ just does not seem right.
Quote from Snigbert -

"If you mess with the historical accuracy, you're going to have ahistorical outcomes."

"I'll say it again for Sonny's sake: If you mess with historical accuracy, you're going to have
ahistorical outcomes. "
User avatar
mogami
Posts: 11053
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: You can't get here from there

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by mogami »

Hi, The Japanese do not have heavy bombers. A heavy bomber is a bomber with four. engines. A meduim bomber has two and a light bomber has one.

Important to realize bombers may attack without escort or with escort that is not enough to meet the requirement. Bombers just have to pass an "escort" check.
If you don't have escort and they fail they won't fly. High morale well rested with aggressive leader bomber groups might fly without escort. (But if the target has a lot of CAP you might regret it)
Image




I'm not retreating, I'm attacking in a different direction!
User avatar
fbastos
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2004 11:05 pm

RE: Nells didn't take off...

Post by fbastos »

low morale and leadership combined with no escort will result in not flying more often then in strike being made.

Do you mean low morale and Inspiration?

From the other messages, leadership seems to influence very little.

F.
I'm running out of jokes...

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”