Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Gary Grigsby's World At War gives you the chance to really run a world war. History is yours to write and things may turn out differently. The Western Allies may be conquered by Germany, or Japan may defeat China. With you at the controls, leading the fates of nations and alliances. Take command in this dynamic turn-based game and test strategies that long-past generals and world leaders could only dream of. Now anything is possible in this new strategic offering from Matrix Games and 2 by 3 Games.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

hickmanj
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:37 am

Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by hickmanj »

Ok, I am in 1944. I have taken SU all the way to Siberia including Caucasus (sp?) and the entire middle east. I have held the Mediterranean until this turn (summer 44) - in other words - I have taken the entire freakin' continent of Europe, plus SU, plus Cairo, middle east..... and I still can't win.

This is on: normal.

???!?!?!?

Jason
"Frazzblut the skreedle - NOW!"
Manfred
Posts: 88
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2004 11:58 am
Location: France
Contact:

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Manfred »

you have to repair ressources you've captured or they'll not count for the automatic victory
"Nous vaincrons parce que nous sommes les plus forts."
Paul Reynaud, 20/03/1940
hickmanj
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:37 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by hickmanj »

How can America have so much that it can wage maximum war on both fronts? I even took Scotland and held it for 2 seasons.

It seems almost impossible to win with Axis - and this is only on normal... Granted I have the AI playing Japan; but I figured they'd be sweeping since I held so much of Africa, Middle East, Europe and SU.

Have the playtesters ever won with Germany alone?

J
"Frazzblut the skreedle - NOW!"
User avatar
Oleg Mastruko
Posts: 4534
Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2000 8:00 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Oleg Mastruko »

Read the latest AAR Joel vs Paul, and see that Axis can win.

You have to repair what you conquer.

O.
User avatar
Marc von Martial
Posts: 5292
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2001 4:00 pm
Location: Bonn, Germany
Contact:

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Marc von Martial »

ORIGINAL: Oleg Mastruko

Read the latest AAR Joel vs Paul, and see that Axis can win.

You have to repair what you conquer.

Yep "scorched earth" is worth nothing [;)]
Dalwin
Posts: 340
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 4:28 pm

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Dalwin »

I have to admit that these reports of it being difficult to win as Germany at normal level are one of the biggest things making me want this game.

As a long time WWII buff I would pick it up anyway, but I am torn between downloading it tonight vs waiting until my local store gets it in tomorrow so I can have a printed manual. :)

I will probably end up going the DD route since I work a Sunday through Thursday week meaning that my weekend starts tonight.

As much as I love HOI2, I hate that I have to give the AI ridiculous handicaps to make things challenging.
User avatar
Becket
Posts: 1242
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:42 pm

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Becket »

Germany is kicking my tail in the gold AAR.

"The very word Moscow meant a lot to all of us....it meant all we had ever fought for" -Rokossovsky
FlakBait
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:07 pm

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by FlakBait »

I do great with Germany until Russia sweeps through me with ease lol. Man I've tried the first campaign at least 5 times already. I'm having a great time though.
forager
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:08 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by forager »

germany is in a tough position but victory is possible.
matrix games currently playing:

highway to the reich
korsun pocket
across the dnepr
battles in normandy
User avatar
Bossy573
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Bossy573 »

ORIGINAL: FlakBait

I do great with Germany until Russia sweeps through me with ease lol. Man I've tried the first campaign at least 5 times already. I'm having a great time though.

Pretty much the same here although I'm on my 3rd game. Playing Germany on just normal settings is pretty difficult so far. The Allies and Russia have such a material advantage it is really quite maddening.
Haven't tinkered with any "alternative" strategies because I have not really mastered the game mechanics in full just yet. Axis and Allies this aint. [;)]

This game is somewhat different, and better, than I thought it would be.
Horsejaw
Posts: 13
Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2002 1:30 am
Location: Independence,WI

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Horsejaw »

He could be playing tota victory. which means he needs to conquer the world.
FlakBait
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 9:07 pm

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by FlakBait »

My only gripe so far is I don’t like how units can travel so far in just one turn. I love the railway and transport aspect of the game but I think it’s a little too extreme. Russia will declare war and then move (what seems like) everything they have in their arsenal up to my border and just rush me. The U.S has a habit of sling shoting an infinite amount of goodies over at me every turn as well. I think no matter how many transports you have lined up or how many railroads you have in perfect working order, it should take a little longer.

Hmm I don’t think it’s on total victory. All the settings are on default as far as gameplay. I’m just playing the first campaign set as normal.
solops
Posts: 1075
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Central Texas

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by solops »

ORIGINAL: FlakBait

My only gripe so far is I don’t like how units can travel so far in just one turn. I love the railway and transport aspect of the game but I think it’s a little too extreme. Russia will declare war and then move (what seems like) everything they have in their arsenal up to my border and just rush me. The U.S has a habit of sling shoting an infinite amount of goodies over at me every turn as well. I think no matter how many transports you have lined up or how many railroads you have in perfect working order, it should take a little longer.

Hmm I don’t think it’s on total victory. All the settings are on default as far as gameplay. I’m just playing the first campaign set as normal.

Remember, these turns cover 3 months. Re: USA...submarines, submarines, submarines...break that line of transports. And heavy bombers may help degrade an enemy's rail system (?).
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.-Edmund Burke
Liberty lies in the hearts of men and women; if it dies there, no constitution, no law, no court can save it.-Judge Learned Hand
User avatar
sveint
Posts: 3837
Joined: Fri Jan 19, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Glorious Europe

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by sveint »

Please do NOT make it easier for Germany to win. It -should- be very very hard to conquer the world as Germany.
literati
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:46 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by literati »

The most ideal opening I've found for Germany is taking the Low Countries, France, and Yugoslavia on your first turn. I then move half my artillery and four fighters or so onto Paris (where my armor is), along with some militia. Mass in Yugoslavia in the East.

Next turn has me taking Spain and Greece. Following turn I take Gibraltar and fill it with arty, fighters, and tactical bombers. My subs (researched and prodcued heavily in Italy) use this as a base of ops.

This puts me in line for a Summer and not Spring invasion of Russia, but the three resources in Spain and the enormous tactical significance of Gibraltar are worth a turn, I think. I then generally wack on Russia and kill WA transports. After Pearl Harbor, I fill the Atlantic with at least 12 3-3 or 3-4 subs and watch them twitch.

Then, of course, the computer US begins kicking the living hell out of the computer Japan, and all hell breaks loose. [:@]
SeaMonkey
Posts: 796
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2004 3:18 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by SeaMonkey »

Is Germany at a disadvantage........well Yeh!!! But there is a remedy. Remember Germany has a partner. Time for you German boys to become the Axis boys. The pathway to victory is a two pronged approach. Come on, I know you guys can handle Japan too!
User avatar
Grotius
Posts: 5842
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2002 5:34 pm
Location: The Imperial Palace.

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by Grotius »

Glad to hear I'm not the only one getting his butt kicked as Germany on normal. I think it's great! Too often in this games I roll all over all of Europe as Germany and then get bored. I have yet to win as Germany in this one.

Japan is next on my list to try -- possibly in a PBEM.
Image
User avatar
aletoledo
Posts: 827
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 6:51 pm
Contact:

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by aletoledo »

nice strat literati, I was thinking of something similair last night, but I'm going to try yours tonight.

Last night I tried the yugoslavia attack first turn as someone else had suggested and it works terrific. I think thats a natural from now on for germany players.
hickmanj
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:37 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by hickmanj »

ORIGINAL: literati

The most ideal opening I've found for Germany is the Low Countries, France, and Yugoslavia on your first turn. I then move half my artillery and four fighters or so onto Paris (where my armor is), along with some militia. Mass in Yugoslavia in the East.

Next turn has me taking Spain and Greece. Following turn I take Gibraltar and fill it with arty, fighters, and tactical bombers. My subs (researched and prodcued heavily in Italy) use this as a base of ops.

This puts me in line for a Summer and not Spring invasion of Russia, but the three resources in Spain and the enormous tactical significance of Gibraltar are worth a turn, I think. I then generally wack on Russia and kill WA transports. After Pearl Harbor, I fill the Atlantic with at least 12 3-3 or 3-4 subs and watch them twitch.

Then, of course, the computer US kickings the living hell out of the computer Japan, and all hell breaks loose. [:@]


I have some questions.

What do you hit Spain/Gibraltar with?

On my first turn, I have done exactly what you do, (Is Denmark considered a Low Country? as I take that as well) - however, when I have then rushed Spain with about 8 or so infantry after bombing it - I take it with losses and then WA usually places a shitload of troops in Gibraltar.... and I can take it but with such heavy losses I've questioned its worth.

But maybe I'm missing something....

Could you spell out the troops/units you use?

Btw, when people say they use air power on ships - that means you click on them and attack correct? They don't automatically attack in some fashion do they? Some of the posts confuse me :) (sigh, lol, 35 and my brain cells seem to be dying)

Thx,

J
"Frazzblut the skreedle - NOW!"
literati
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 1:46 am

RE: Is Germany at too great a disadvantage? Patch?

Post by literati »

ORIGINAL: hickmanj
I have some questions.

What do you hit Spain/Gibraltar with?

I'm typing from memory, here, as my wife has taken my wargaming machine. She's still, after five years, under the mistaken impression that the wargaming box is something called a 'computer' and that one can do more than fight WW2 countless times on it. Women. I'll never understand them.


TURN ONE


Denmark: 1 infantry, auto-win.

Netherlands: 2 arty and infantry to the point where I get a good %.

Yugoslavia 1: One fighter/bomber from Italy to unlock surrounding areas.

Yusgoslavia 2: Gangbang by surrounding units. Always messy (lose four militia, usually).

Paris: All of my armour and bombers.

^ The bombers are very important to keep armour loss to a minimum.

Misc: Repair select trains and resources, move to threaten Greece and move at least 4 fighters/2 flak to Paris.


TURN TWO


Greece: with whatever is down there. Isn't hard.

Spain 1: All armour/fighters/flak attack. I usually do NOT include arty, as they will die, and I want them in Gibraltar.

Misc: Repair Spain's rails. Move all available tactical bombers to Spain, along with more fighters if you think you'll need them. You can also move as many infantry there as you like by rail. When I play this opening, Gibraltar is the ONLY attack I will do the folllowing turn.

TURN THREE

Gibraltar: By any means necessary. Bombers/fighters help a lot if they have been reinforced by London. I usually DO use a couple arty. They will die, but a good combined force of air and arty with armour leading the way will not take unreasonable damage.
Btw, when people say they use air power on ships - that means you click on them and attack correct? They don't automatically attack in some fashion do they? Some of the posts confuse me :) (sigh, lol, 35 and my brain cells seem to be dying)

Fighters will interdict from islands and inlets just like arty, but mostly it's just sending the planes out and bombing, if I understand your question.
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's World at War”