Canuck's Revenge - ADavidB vs PzB (Wobbly's game continued)
Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
- Lord_Calidor
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 8:00 am
- Location: Rijeka, CRO
- Contact:
RE: Gili-Gili is mine!
Oh s**t, man, you just bombed Yamato, and it's heavily damaged!
Hats off!
[;)][:D]
Hats off!
[;)][:D]
But when the blast of war blows in our ears,
Then imitate the action of the tiger;
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage.
Then imitate the action of the tiger;
Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood,
Disguise fair nature with hard-favour'd rage.
On to Munda...
As planned my troops started to land at Munda on October 5 and as expected the landing was unopposed. One thing that I did wrong in the theater as a whole was that I forgot to put my LRCAP in place. That's one of the problems of having a long layoff in a game like this. I've forgotten some of the nitty-gritty details. So PzB got some "freebies" this turn. The first time I got "lucky":
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 5
No Japanese losses
Allied Ships
PG Dawson
AP Kanimba
The next time PzB had his way:
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
AK Kanlaon II
MSW Bunbury, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Finally I got lucky again:
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 2
No Japanese losses
Allied Ships
AK Hinsang
Fortunately PzB is sending his bombers at long range and with no CAP. I've already sent my carrier TF home that provided the LRCAP for the invasion itself, so I've now moved some P-40Bs forward to provide CAP over Gili-Gili and as well, CAP over the landing at Munda. However, I can't reach Rossel Island, so PzB got to hit another transport:
Day Air attack on TF, near Rossel Island at 58,97
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
MSW Vireo
AK Montanes, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
I'm moving some Seabees to Rossel to help with building up the airbase. Once I can put a fighter squadron in there I won't have to worry about Bettys any more.
BTW - as I predicted, PzB sent "the kitchen sink" against Columbo:
Day Air attack on Colombo , at 14,24
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 7
Ki-21 Sally x 119
Ki-46-II Dinah x 4
Allied aircraft
no flights
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 7 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
Catalina I: 1 destroyed
Wellington III: 3 destroyed, 17 damaged
Allied ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 14
Airbase supply hits 13
Runway hits 62
But there is a fair amount of FOW in that report - I was still able to fly more Wellingtons back to China. The other good thing about this is that those Sallys are not hitting Java this turn. It's nice to be able to move LBA around and keep PzB on his toes.
Otherwise I whacked Kendari again, just to keep it out of action, and my tacbombers in northern Oz continued with their daily target practice on Koepang. I now have a lot of well trained, well rested and good morale tacbombers in northern Oz.
BTW II - if you are wondering when you will see reports of P-38s coming into action, my "inventory" has now reached 14...
BTW III - if you are also wondering about my use and or non-use of fighters recently, I am still trying to build inventories of useful fighters. I still have lots groups of P-40Bs and P-36s, but no inventory of P-40Bs or Es. Slowly I am getting some of the groups upgraded, but as you can see in the Solomons, it is still useful to have Bs around. (I suspect that one of the factors in the time required to rebuild my pools is that a lot of replacements are being used up by new fighter groups that are being recreated 3 months after I disbanded them or 6 months after Wobbly lost them.)
It's interesting that in his emails that accompany his turns, PzB has been commenting upon setting up a defense to stop longer range amphibious attacks. If he isn't trying to psych me out, then that explains some of the reason why he is letting me take bases near to my current positions. But I'm taking the historic Allied strategy at this point, ignoring the loss of India and the situation in Java, and I am trying to set up a situation in the Solomons that negates PzB's positions in New Britain and northern NG. Wobbly's actions prior to my takeover have allowed me to build strong positions in the Gilberts and Solomons and I'm now able to prevent PzB from extending his front line positions in both areas. I hope that this is PzB's strategy, because this way I'll be able to continue to build multiple bases from which I will be able to destroy his positions in the theater from the air in early 1943.
But if PzB is trying to psych me out, he is running out of time to bring overwhelming force to play. I have a lot of good, strong bases now that are mutually supporting. Unless he throws everything into an attack at a specific location, as he did at Karachi, he will find a lot of force immediately brought to play in response. And the BIG difference now is that he can't "march" his forces into position against my bases, he has to ship them in.
So the question will continue to be - will PzB move against any of my existing positions now or will he wait to try to put himself at a local overwhelming advantage when I attack. If he waits for me I will continue with a variation on the historic timetable and my response will be designed to handle whatever he tries to put in place.
Dave Baranyi
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 5
No Japanese losses
Allied Ships
PG Dawson
AP Kanimba
The next time PzB had his way:
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
AK Kanlaon II
MSW Bunbury, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Finally I got lucky again:
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 2
No Japanese losses
Allied Ships
AK Hinsang
Fortunately PzB is sending his bombers at long range and with no CAP. I've already sent my carrier TF home that provided the LRCAP for the invasion itself, so I've now moved some P-40Bs forward to provide CAP over Gili-Gili and as well, CAP over the landing at Munda. However, I can't reach Rossel Island, so PzB got to hit another transport:
Day Air attack on TF, near Rossel Island at 58,97
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
MSW Vireo
AK Montanes, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
I'm moving some Seabees to Rossel to help with building up the airbase. Once I can put a fighter squadron in there I won't have to worry about Bettys any more.
BTW - as I predicted, PzB sent "the kitchen sink" against Columbo:
Day Air attack on Colombo , at 14,24
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 7
Ki-21 Sally x 119
Ki-46-II Dinah x 4
Allied aircraft
no flights
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-21 Sally: 7 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
Catalina I: 1 destroyed
Wellington III: 3 destroyed, 17 damaged
Allied ground losses:
15 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 14
Airbase supply hits 13
Runway hits 62
But there is a fair amount of FOW in that report - I was still able to fly more Wellingtons back to China. The other good thing about this is that those Sallys are not hitting Java this turn. It's nice to be able to move LBA around and keep PzB on his toes.
Otherwise I whacked Kendari again, just to keep it out of action, and my tacbombers in northern Oz continued with their daily target practice on Koepang. I now have a lot of well trained, well rested and good morale tacbombers in northern Oz.
BTW II - if you are wondering when you will see reports of P-38s coming into action, my "inventory" has now reached 14...
BTW III - if you are also wondering about my use and or non-use of fighters recently, I am still trying to build inventories of useful fighters. I still have lots groups of P-40Bs and P-36s, but no inventory of P-40Bs or Es. Slowly I am getting some of the groups upgraded, but as you can see in the Solomons, it is still useful to have Bs around. (I suspect that one of the factors in the time required to rebuild my pools is that a lot of replacements are being used up by new fighter groups that are being recreated 3 months after I disbanded them or 6 months after Wobbly lost them.)
It's interesting that in his emails that accompany his turns, PzB has been commenting upon setting up a defense to stop longer range amphibious attacks. If he isn't trying to psych me out, then that explains some of the reason why he is letting me take bases near to my current positions. But I'm taking the historic Allied strategy at this point, ignoring the loss of India and the situation in Java, and I am trying to set up a situation in the Solomons that negates PzB's positions in New Britain and northern NG. Wobbly's actions prior to my takeover have allowed me to build strong positions in the Gilberts and Solomons and I'm now able to prevent PzB from extending his front line positions in both areas. I hope that this is PzB's strategy, because this way I'll be able to continue to build multiple bases from which I will be able to destroy his positions in the theater from the air in early 1943.
But if PzB is trying to psych me out, he is running out of time to bring overwhelming force to play. I have a lot of good, strong bases now that are mutually supporting. Unless he throws everything into an attack at a specific location, as he did at Karachi, he will find a lot of force immediately brought to play in response. And the BIG difference now is that he can't "march" his forces into position against my bases, he has to ship them in.
So the question will continue to be - will PzB move against any of my existing positions now or will he wait to try to put himself at a local overwhelming advantage when I attack. If he waits for me I will continue with a variation on the historic timetable and my response will be designed to handle whatever he tries to put in place.
Dave Baranyi
Munda is mine...
So my troops captured Munda on October 6:
Ground combat at Munda
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 3062 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied assault odds: 37 to 1 (fort level 0)
Allied forces CAPTURE Munda base !!!
Now I'll start my normal routine to build it up.
But while I was adjusting my air cover everywhere else for the 6th, I forgot about bolstering the CAP at PM and got caught with weak planes in the air:
Day Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 53,91
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 9
Allied aircraft
Wirraway x 13
Kittyhawk I x 21
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed, 3 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk I: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
DD Evertsen
AP Chaumont, Torpedo hits 1
and:
Day Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 53,91
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 9
Allied aircraft
Wirraway x 12
Kittyhawk I x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 3 destroyed, 3 damaged
Allied Ships
MSW Gladstone, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AD Cascade, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
Nothing was sunk, so I refueled all of them, disbanded the TFs and put them into port for a turn. Most of these ships were the transports from the Gili-Gili landing. I want to use them to bring out more worn-down units out of PM to rest up in non-malaria Oz. In order to take care of PzB's Bettys, I brought in a 36-plane squadron of grounded Wildcats from one of my sunken carriers. That crowd ought to do a better job on the Bettys the next time.
The main thing that allowed PzB to get away with those attacks was that rain/clouds buggered up my planned air attacks on Rabaul and region. Only a couple of very feeble attacks got off from PM and the B-24s in Lunga sat on the ground. Maybe they will find the weather more to their liking this turn. Certainly there ought to be "better hunting" at Rabaul with PzB's Bettys congregating there.
That reminds me - I wonder where he pulled those Bettys from...does this open up any potential raids?...
Otherwise things are fairly quiet in most places. The exception is India where PzB has rested up his troops enough and is sending some of them out to chase down my remaining stragglers. That's actually a waste on his part because all I have going around are support troops - I couldn't capture a base even if he didn't occupy it. But I'm not telling that to PzB - Japanese troops that wander uselessly in India aren't bothering me elsewhere. [:D]
Also in Celon PzB has a couple of LCUs on the land march to Colombo. Cool - my fortifications are quite strong there, I still have lots of supplies and my forces have been resting for a couple of months. It will be interesting to see if these troops can do anything useful.
Dave Baranyi
Ground combat at Munda
Allied Deliberate attack
Attacking force 3062 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles
Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Allied assault odds: 37 to 1 (fort level 0)
Allied forces CAPTURE Munda base !!!
Now I'll start my normal routine to build it up.
But while I was adjusting my air cover everywhere else for the 6th, I forgot about bolstering the CAP at PM and got caught with weak planes in the air:
Day Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 53,91
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 9
Allied aircraft
Wirraway x 13
Kittyhawk I x 21
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 4 destroyed, 3 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
Kittyhawk I: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
DD Evertsen
AP Chaumont, Torpedo hits 1
and:
Day Air attack on TF, near Port Moresby at 53,91
Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 9
Allied aircraft
Wirraway x 12
Kittyhawk I x 6
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 3 destroyed, 3 damaged
Allied Ships
MSW Gladstone, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AD Cascade, Torpedo hits 1, on fire
Nothing was sunk, so I refueled all of them, disbanded the TFs and put them into port for a turn. Most of these ships were the transports from the Gili-Gili landing. I want to use them to bring out more worn-down units out of PM to rest up in non-malaria Oz. In order to take care of PzB's Bettys, I brought in a 36-plane squadron of grounded Wildcats from one of my sunken carriers. That crowd ought to do a better job on the Bettys the next time.
The main thing that allowed PzB to get away with those attacks was that rain/clouds buggered up my planned air attacks on Rabaul and region. Only a couple of very feeble attacks got off from PM and the B-24s in Lunga sat on the ground. Maybe they will find the weather more to their liking this turn. Certainly there ought to be "better hunting" at Rabaul with PzB's Bettys congregating there.
That reminds me - I wonder where he pulled those Bettys from...does this open up any potential raids?...
Otherwise things are fairly quiet in most places. The exception is India where PzB has rested up his troops enough and is sending some of them out to chase down my remaining stragglers. That's actually a waste on his part because all I have going around are support troops - I couldn't capture a base even if he didn't occupy it. But I'm not telling that to PzB - Japanese troops that wander uselessly in India aren't bothering me elsewhere. [:D]
Also in Celon PzB has a couple of LCUs on the land march to Colombo. Cool - my fortifications are quite strong there, I still have lots of supplies and my forces have been resting for a couple of months. It will be interesting to see if these troops can do anything useful.
Dave Baranyi
The Tokyo Express appears...
I've apparently reached a "reaction threshold" for PzB in the Solomons with my invasion of Munda. He sent the "Tokyo Express" in to hit my forces. He missed my transports but did catch the mine layers that I had sent in:
Night Time Surface Combat, near Munda at 64,95
Japanese Ships
CA Haguro, Shell hits 1
CL Kuma
CL Yubari
DD Kuroshio
DD Hatsukaze
DD Arashi
DD Wakaba
DD Isonami
DD Harukaze
DD Hatakaze
Allied Ships
DM Tracy, Shell hits 9, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DM Preble, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DM Pruitt, Shell hits 11, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DM Sicard, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
He then followed up with a bombardment:
Naval bombardment of Munda, at 64,95
Japanese Ships
CL Yubari
CL Kuma
CA Haguro
Allied ground losses:
125 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Good move on his part. I'll now "raise the ante" in the region and see how much he wants to commit. Unfortunately, my regional air forces continue to sit back and eat coconut crabs instead of flying. I did notice that my B-24s were suddenly being commanded by a total schmuck, so I replaced him and I'm hoping that this will be the trick to get them in the air.
Otherwise, PzB has brought his 100+ Sallys back to Palembang to hit Java again. Okay...I moved the Wellingtons back to Colombo to go after the TFs that he has sailing slowly in the region. We'll see if he predicts my move.
So it looks as if PzB won't give me a continuation of the freedom of movement that I've had in the past in the Pacific. Okay, let's see what I can do with the changed conditions.
Dave Baranyi
Night Time Surface Combat, near Munda at 64,95
Japanese Ships
CA Haguro, Shell hits 1
CL Kuma
CL Yubari
DD Kuroshio
DD Hatsukaze
DD Arashi
DD Wakaba
DD Isonami
DD Harukaze
DD Hatakaze
Allied Ships
DM Tracy, Shell hits 9, Torpedo hits 2, and is sunk
DM Preble, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DM Pruitt, Shell hits 11, Torpedo hits 1, and is sunk
DM Sicard, Shell hits 5, Torpedo hits 3, and is sunk
He then followed up with a bombardment:
Naval bombardment of Munda, at 64,95
Japanese Ships
CL Yubari
CL Kuma
CA Haguro
Allied ground losses:
125 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Good move on his part. I'll now "raise the ante" in the region and see how much he wants to commit. Unfortunately, my regional air forces continue to sit back and eat coconut crabs instead of flying. I did notice that my B-24s were suddenly being commanded by a total schmuck, so I replaced him and I'm hoping that this will be the trick to get them in the air.
Otherwise, PzB has brought his 100+ Sallys back to Palembang to hit Java again. Okay...I moved the Wellingtons back to Colombo to go after the TFs that he has sailing slowly in the region. We'll see if he predicts my move.
So it looks as if PzB won't give me a continuation of the freedom of movement that I've had in the past in the Pacific. Okay, let's see what I can do with the changed conditions.
Dave Baranyi
RE: The Tokyo Express appears...
This turn the Tokyo Express didn't return. I expect that PzB will try to it again, so I'll send more ships in to Munda to see what I can "catch". My bombers finally flew - changing leaders seems to have done the trick - but PzB has expanded Rabaul a lot and it is getting harder to cause serious damage. I did get a good, solid raid in on Maloelap:
Day Air attack on Maloelap , at 82,81
Allied aircraft
F-5A Lightning x 4
B-17E Fortress x 76
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 14 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
31 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 11
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 36
Port hits 2
Port supply hits 1
I want to keep this base damaged - PzB has been moving a lot of troops into it and I want them to spend their time trying to fix things. He has stopped trying to defend it with CAP, so that is a good sign. I want to limit the number of bases in the Marshalls from which he can launch planes.
I "went to the well" one too many times by bringing my Wellingtons back to Columbo so soon and PzB did have his bombers back. But my Wellingtons still were able to get off and hit one ship:
Day Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 13,21
Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 4
No Allied losses
Japanese Ships
AP Yamato Maru, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
Japanese ground losses:
60 casualties reported
That ship eventually sank and they had to fish the troops out of the drink.
Hey - it's not much, but every little bit counts. [:)]
Dave Baranyi
Day Air attack on Maloelap , at 82,81
Allied aircraft
F-5A Lightning x 4
B-17E Fortress x 76
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 14 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
31 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Airbase hits 11
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 36
Port hits 2
Port supply hits 1
I want to keep this base damaged - PzB has been moving a lot of troops into it and I want them to spend their time trying to fix things. He has stopped trying to defend it with CAP, so that is a good sign. I want to limit the number of bases in the Marshalls from which he can launch planes.
I "went to the well" one too many times by bringing my Wellingtons back to Columbo so soon and PzB did have his bombers back. But my Wellingtons still were able to get off and hit one ship:
Day Air attack on TF, near Trivandrum at 13,21
Allied aircraft
Wellington III x 4
No Allied losses
Japanese Ships
AP Yamato Maru, Bomb hits 4, on fire, heavy damage
Japanese ground losses:
60 casualties reported
That ship eventually sank and they had to fish the troops out of the drink.
Hey - it's not much, but every little bit counts. [:)]
Dave Baranyi
The sound of crickets...
October 9th was a very quiet day for PzB. If my tacbombers in northern Oz hadn't gone off to hit his base in Timor he wouldn't have known I was around. [;)]
It was also surprisingly quiet from my p.o.v. - my unloading ships in various locations from PNG to the eastern Solomons were totally unmolested by either air or naval forces. That's odd - it's almost as if PzB knew about my comment regarding wondering about "raids" into where he pulled those Bettys from... you guys aren't "spilling the beans" are you? Remember, "Loose Lips Sink Ships". [:-]
It appears that now that I no longer have any bases in India my troops there won't retreat under attack, regardless of the odds and regardless of "escape paths". So if PzB can "catch" my units he ought to be able to completely destroy them.
In any event, back to the business at hand - building bases and preparing forces.
BTW - I created my first P-38 squadron today. I also disbanded that P-39D Squadron that "insisted" on having "P-39D" as it's upgrade path. Maybe when it comes back in 3 months it will fix itself.
Dave Baranyi
It was also surprisingly quiet from my p.o.v. - my unloading ships in various locations from PNG to the eastern Solomons were totally unmolested by either air or naval forces. That's odd - it's almost as if PzB knew about my comment regarding wondering about "raids" into where he pulled those Bettys from... you guys aren't "spilling the beans" are you? Remember, "Loose Lips Sink Ships". [:-]
It appears that now that I no longer have any bases in India my troops there won't retreat under attack, regardless of the odds and regardless of "escape paths". So if PzB can "catch" my units he ought to be able to completely destroy them.
In any event, back to the business at hand - building bases and preparing forces.
BTW - I created my first P-38 squadron today. I also disbanded that P-39D Squadron that "insisted" on having "P-39D" as it's upgrade path. Maybe when it comes back in 3 months it will fix itself.
Dave Baranyi
RE: The sound of crickets...
Dear ADavidB,
Read your AAR of the continuation of Wobbly's battle, and the fall of Karachi.
I agree that the game is kluged in that it doesn't allow you to get your troops (well, at least the American ones) that were supposed to go to Karachi but couldn't.
I am not sure how you would feel about this, but i think you can get them under the game rules: namely, if you use PP and reassign units in the LCU reinforcements queue, you can get US units originally assigned to say, CenPac to come in at Karachi (known fact)by reassigning them to SEAsia, so probably the reverse is also true.
I think it might be gamey to get Indian or British troops to arrive at San Francisco, but it would be more realistic if US troops that were originally supposed to go to India were released to the Pacific theater via SF. I would suggest trying a small unit in the queue to show up in Karachi and assigning them to CenPac or SoPac or whatever. They show up at the appropriate place a couple days after they were due to come in after they are reassigned according to some posts. Try to see if it works before using 1000 PPs on a bunch of units.
Good luck in your battles!!
Read your AAR of the continuation of Wobbly's battle, and the fall of Karachi.
I agree that the game is kluged in that it doesn't allow you to get your troops (well, at least the American ones) that were supposed to go to Karachi but couldn't.
I am not sure how you would feel about this, but i think you can get them under the game rules: namely, if you use PP and reassign units in the LCU reinforcements queue, you can get US units originally assigned to say, CenPac to come in at Karachi (known fact)by reassigning them to SEAsia, so probably the reverse is also true.
I think it might be gamey to get Indian or British troops to arrive at San Francisco, but it would be more realistic if US troops that were originally supposed to go to India were released to the Pacific theater via SF. I would suggest trying a small unit in the queue to show up in Karachi and assigning them to CenPac or SoPac or whatever. They show up at the appropriate place a couple days after they were due to come in after they are reassigned according to some posts. Try to see if it works before using 1000 PPs on a bunch of units.
Good luck in your battles!!
RE: The sound of crickets...
I am not sure how you would feel about this, but i think you can get them under the game rules: namely, if you use PP and reassign units in the LCU reinforcements queue, you can get US units originally assigned to say, CenPac to come in at Karachi (known fact)by reassigning them to SEAsia, so probably the reverse is also true.
AFAIK, there is no way to adjust the settings of the units in the reinforcements queues, political points or not. Also, I haven't asked PzB about this, but if his reaction to the Manchurian base transferring to Soviet control is any indication, I suspect he wouldn't be in favor of this at all.
I still feel that US units assigned to enter in Karachi ought to show up in the US somewhere, but I'm in an apparent minority in that opinion.
Thanks for your ideas -
Dave
RE: The sound of crickets...
I just check the forum and found the thread:
SE Asia Formations in SF.
fb.asp?m=839389
Apparently this represents a one way trip from SF to Karachi if you change an arriving units HQ to SEAsia (show up about 2 days after reassignment). Not the other way around, i guess, and since the "in limbo" units don't arrive it doesn't help.
SE Asia Formations in SF.
fb.asp?m=839389
Apparently this represents a one way trip from SF to Karachi if you change an arriving units HQ to SEAsia (show up about 2 days after reassignment). Not the other way around, i guess, and since the "in limbo" units don't arrive it doesn't help.
RE: The sound of crickets...
ORIGINAL: rtrapasso
I just check the forum and found the thread:
SE Asia Formations in SF.
fb.asp?m=839389
Apparently this represents a one way trip from SF to Karachi if you change an arriving units HQ to SEAsia (show up about 2 days after reassignment). Not the other way around, i guess, and since the "in limbo" units don't arrive it doesn't help.
Thanks for the lead, I never read that thread. But I wouldn't have used it anyway if I knew in time - there was no way that I wanted to get more troops trapped in Karachi.
Dave
Bettys vs Tomahawks
Well, I've got my LR CAP in place right now and it is getting challenged by PzB as I try to supply my recent conquests on October 10:
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G4M1 Betty x 6
Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 8 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 2 destroyed
Allied Ships
MSW Arnidale, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Hinsang, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Again, nothing sank here, but both ships were heavily damaged. It's too bad that Gili-Gili doesn't have a level 3 port yet. In fact, it's too bad that Gili-Gili doesn't have a level 1 airfield so I wouldn't have to rely on LR CAP.
PzB's boys weren't so lucky at Munda:
Day Air attack on TF, near Munda at 64,95
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G4M1 Betty x 6
Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 2 destroyed
Allied Ships
MSW Benalla
AP Empire Pride
That's a good thing because I forgot to turn the "unload" button on... I use various small islands as "way points" for my TFs and leave the setting on "do not unload" until I get near to my final destination. And as happened this time, sometimes I forget to reset it before reaching the destination. Such is the price of having old, tired and distracted brain cells...[>:]
For the first time in what feels like months one of my subs actually tried an attack on a transport this turn too. But it didn't do anything. I can empathize with the skipper and crew of that sub in the story that Mogami posted in another thread.
PzB must be getting pretty frustrated with his attempts to wipe out my stragglers in India. The fewer they become the more "Rambos" remain it seems...
Ground combat at 22,2
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 44612 troops, 215 guns, 4 vehicles
Defending force 11202 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 138 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
44 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Allied ground losses:
544 casualties reported
What this suggests is that the best way to defend the mainland is to place all of your troops in the worst terrain and leave them alone...
BTW - PzB is now bombing Colombo on a daily basis. I guess that he wants to shut down the air base once and for all before his LCUs get there. What is odd is that I continue to be able to pull Wellingtons out of there. They keep on rebuilding because of all the supplies. If PzB happens to stop bombing I'll send more bombers back in just to take advantage of this "feature"...[:'(]
BTW II - weather allowing, I'm sending out a bunch of heavy bombers next turn.
Dave Baranyi
Day Air attack on TF, near Gili Gili at 56,94
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G4M1 Betty x 6
Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 8
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 8 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed
Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 2 destroyed
Allied Ships
MSW Arnidale, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
AK Hinsang, Torpedo hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
Again, nothing sank here, but both ships were heavily damaged. It's too bad that Gili-Gili doesn't have a level 3 port yet. In fact, it's too bad that Gili-Gili doesn't have a level 1 airfield so I wouldn't have to rely on LR CAP.
PzB's boys weren't so lucky at Munda:
Day Air attack on TF, near Munda at 64,95
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 8
G4M1 Betty x 6
Allied aircraft
P-40B Tomahawk x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
P-40B Tomahawk: 2 destroyed
Allied Ships
MSW Benalla
AP Empire Pride
That's a good thing because I forgot to turn the "unload" button on... I use various small islands as "way points" for my TFs and leave the setting on "do not unload" until I get near to my final destination. And as happened this time, sometimes I forget to reset it before reaching the destination. Such is the price of having old, tired and distracted brain cells...[>:]
For the first time in what feels like months one of my subs actually tried an attack on a transport this turn too. But it didn't do anything. I can empathize with the skipper and crew of that sub in the story that Mogami posted in another thread.
PzB must be getting pretty frustrated with his attempts to wipe out my stragglers in India. The fewer they become the more "Rambos" remain it seems...
Ground combat at 22,2
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 44612 troops, 215 guns, 4 vehicles
Defending force 11202 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 138 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
44 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Allied ground losses:
544 casualties reported
What this suggests is that the best way to defend the mainland is to place all of your troops in the worst terrain and leave them alone...
BTW - PzB is now bombing Colombo on a daily basis. I guess that he wants to shut down the air base once and for all before his LCUs get there. What is odd is that I continue to be able to pull Wellingtons out of there. They keep on rebuilding because of all the supplies. If PzB happens to stop bombing I'll send more bombers back in just to take advantage of this "feature"...[:'(]
BTW II - weather allowing, I'm sending out a bunch of heavy bombers next turn.
Dave Baranyi
RE: Bettys vs Tomahawks
October 11 kept pretty much the same pattern as the past few days. I bombed Kendari (temporarily) back into the Stone Age and PzB's Bettys flew out of various bases to hit those of my ships in the Solomons that aren't protected by CAP. I'll have to accept those losses right now because I'm determined to get my bases built up. Unfortunately PzB has more airbases in the region than I have heavy bombers, so I can't shut him down as I have in the region around Timor.
PzB is also increasing his air activity around Java - he may be moving in soon. I sent some tacbombers after one of his bases, but they couldn't do much - PzB has flooded the area with Zeros.
PzB may be trying another Tokyo Express run into the Eastern Solomons, but I'm not betting that he is necessarily going after Munda again. So since I've got several surface fleets in the region I'm spreading them out a bit. Now if my LBA will only fly out of Lunga for a change.
PzB is also doing more nuisance sub-mining. I just send in the MSWs and hope to catch one of his subs. He also has that sub back between Hawaii and Palmyra.
So for now there isn't a lot more that I can do until I get more bases built up. I'll be getting 4 more engineer groups in a week or so - they will help things out.
Dave Baranyi
PzB is also increasing his air activity around Java - he may be moving in soon. I sent some tacbombers after one of his bases, but they couldn't do much - PzB has flooded the area with Zeros.
PzB may be trying another Tokyo Express run into the Eastern Solomons, but I'm not betting that he is necessarily going after Munda again. So since I've got several surface fleets in the region I'm spreading them out a bit. Now if my LBA will only fly out of Lunga for a change.
PzB is also doing more nuisance sub-mining. I just send in the MSWs and hope to catch one of his subs. He also has that sub back between Hawaii and Palmyra.
So for now there isn't a lot more that I can do until I get more bases built up. I'll be getting 4 more engineer groups in a week or so - they will help things out.
Dave Baranyi
Clouds in the skies...
October 12 was an odd game turn - only one little B-17 squadron got off and did little, elsewhere across the map everything was on the ground watching the rain. But that's okay, my flyboys do better after they've sat around a watched raindrops for a bit.
PzB's bombardment and/or surface raider TF is still sitting off of New Britain, waiting to sail in to one of my bases in the Eastern Solomons. My LBA didn't go after them the last time, but I suspect that the presence of the LBA was enough to cause the AI to keep the ships out of range. So I've positioned my surface forces again and we'll see if I've guessed right.
PzB now has two subs sitting in Nauru Island - I don't know if they are laying mines or trying to attack something. I'm sending more ASW in after them but it will take a couple of days to get there. My patrol planes will detect subs but they almost never attack them.
Speaking of attacking subs, the escorts in a small transport TF that was returning to Pearl actually hit one of PzB's spy subs:
ASW attack at 108,75
Japanese Ships
SS RO-62, hits 1
Allied Ships
MSW Kelowna
AK George Vancouver
AK George Ross
At least I'm assuming that this was the sub that was launching the Glen a couple of turns ago.
PzB also put more mines in Lautem than I first thought - my second MSW TF has gone through there now and there are still some mines left. That's okay, I'm not sending other shipping there and my mine sweepers can always use more practice.
PzB hit Colombo hard again, but not Java. I wonder if he was guessing that I might bring the Wellingtons back? Right now I'm just resting them up in China.
PzB is still having a hard time with my stragglers in India:
Ground combat at 22,2
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 45025 troops, 215 guns, 3 vehicles
Defending force 8278 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 300 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Allied ground losses:
6723 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
I still have a couple of LCUs left in that hex. These were the troops who were driven out of the city next to Karachi. They've lasted quite a long time. I still don't understand the game mechanics here - why do these already wiped-out troops last so long against huge odds when much stronger troops surrender at 2:1 in cities? Oh well, I'm not complaining - the game mechanics are helping PzB waste a lot of time.
The other strange effect is in PzB's training/bombing campaign in China. Each turn he sends hundreds of planes against some very weak and isolated Chinese troops. And most of the time I get no casualties. I guess that it is worth it for PzB because he gets training for his pilots, but it seems that he ought to get some hits out of the effort.
It's an odd game at times...
Dave Baranyi
PzB's bombardment and/or surface raider TF is still sitting off of New Britain, waiting to sail in to one of my bases in the Eastern Solomons. My LBA didn't go after them the last time, but I suspect that the presence of the LBA was enough to cause the AI to keep the ships out of range. So I've positioned my surface forces again and we'll see if I've guessed right.
PzB now has two subs sitting in Nauru Island - I don't know if they are laying mines or trying to attack something. I'm sending more ASW in after them but it will take a couple of days to get there. My patrol planes will detect subs but they almost never attack them.
Speaking of attacking subs, the escorts in a small transport TF that was returning to Pearl actually hit one of PzB's spy subs:
ASW attack at 108,75
Japanese Ships
SS RO-62, hits 1
Allied Ships
MSW Kelowna
AK George Vancouver
AK George Ross
At least I'm assuming that this was the sub that was launching the Glen a couple of turns ago.
PzB also put more mines in Lautem than I first thought - my second MSW TF has gone through there now and there are still some mines left. That's okay, I'm not sending other shipping there and my mine sweepers can always use more practice.
PzB hit Colombo hard again, but not Java. I wonder if he was guessing that I might bring the Wellingtons back? Right now I'm just resting them up in China.
PzB is still having a hard time with my stragglers in India:
Ground combat at 22,2
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 45025 troops, 215 guns, 3 vehicles
Defending force 8278 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
Japanese assault odds: 300 to 1
Japanese ground losses:
13 casualties reported
Guns lost 1
Allied ground losses:
6723 casualties reported
Guns lost 2
I still have a couple of LCUs left in that hex. These were the troops who were driven out of the city next to Karachi. They've lasted quite a long time. I still don't understand the game mechanics here - why do these already wiped-out troops last so long against huge odds when much stronger troops surrender at 2:1 in cities? Oh well, I'm not complaining - the game mechanics are helping PzB waste a lot of time.
The other strange effect is in PzB's training/bombing campaign in China. Each turn he sends hundreds of planes against some very weak and isolated Chinese troops. And most of the time I get no casualties. I guess that it is worth it for PzB because he gets training for his pilots, but it seems that he ought to get some hits out of the effort.
It's an odd game at times...
Dave Baranyi
RE: Clouds in the skies...
ORIGINAL: String
RO subs don't carry planes
Okay, so there is still a spy sub out there. Thanks!
Dave
Drop back 5 yards and punt...
October 13 brought another unsuccessful air raid by one group of my heavy bombers, and a lot of cancelled air raids by my other heavy and tactical bombers. PzB has now brought up a lot of force into the New Britain area and continues to build up the Marshalls. My time of having local superiority in those two regions has passed. So I'm now going to try to consolidate my positions a bit and do some R&O on some of my major ships.
I have to be fairly careful with my forces right now because I'm not getting any significant reinforcements for several months - air groups, combat ships or combat troops. I don't want to get into slugging matches when I don't have local superiority. So I'm going to try to build up what I have and protect it for a month or so, game-time.
As part of this, I'm sending my US carriers back to repair bases to receive their long-delayed upgrades. I have a fair amount of LBA in position at all of my key forward positions and I'll let them take the brunt of any serious air campaign that PzB may start. Right now PzB is pretty happy with picking off my transports as I reinforce and resupply in the PNG-to-Solomons front, so those successes may keep him going with what he sees as a "winning approach".
Time is what I need right now - time to get my first P-38 squadron repaired and readied for combat, time to get more P-39 squadrons converted to P-38s, time to rest up my B-17s and B-24s and get them reasonably repaired, time to move more engineering groups to the bases where I need fast development.
The upcoming events with the greatest potential for mischief are the movements of my stragglers in India. I now have one LCU taking advantage of the railroad to move across India with speed I haven't seen in months. (I guess they just bought a couple thousand tickets and are riding along...[;)]) Has PzB kept troops in the Indian cities that he conquered, or has he succumb to "temptation" and abandoned some of the inland cities? We'll see in a little while.
Dave Baranyi
I have to be fairly careful with my forces right now because I'm not getting any significant reinforcements for several months - air groups, combat ships or combat troops. I don't want to get into slugging matches when I don't have local superiority. So I'm going to try to build up what I have and protect it for a month or so, game-time.
As part of this, I'm sending my US carriers back to repair bases to receive their long-delayed upgrades. I have a fair amount of LBA in position at all of my key forward positions and I'll let them take the brunt of any serious air campaign that PzB may start. Right now PzB is pretty happy with picking off my transports as I reinforce and resupply in the PNG-to-Solomons front, so those successes may keep him going with what he sees as a "winning approach".
Time is what I need right now - time to get my first P-38 squadron repaired and readied for combat, time to get more P-39 squadrons converted to P-38s, time to rest up my B-17s and B-24s and get them reasonably repaired, time to move more engineering groups to the bases where I need fast development.
The upcoming events with the greatest potential for mischief are the movements of my stragglers in India. I now have one LCU taking advantage of the railroad to move across India with speed I haven't seen in months. (I guess they just bought a couple thousand tickets and are riding along...[;)]) Has PzB kept troops in the Indian cities that he conquered, or has he succumb to "temptation" and abandoned some of the inland cities? We'll see in a little while.
Dave Baranyi
- Rob Brennan UK
- Posts: 3685
- Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
- Location: London UK
RE: Drop back 5 yards and punt...
Oh boy that would be funny .. especially if hes pulled most of his a/c out and has no recon in india ! .. could have all sorts of fun. Hyderabad falling to a base force [:D]
Time to take advantage of the 'odd' movement system for yourself rather than being on the recieving end for a change ..
As an aside whats happening in china ? maybe i missed it but havnt seen any reports on that front for a while .. maybe a screenie pls .. Also well done on picking up the pieces from wobbly .. he did his best but was probably taking uppers come june 42 .. just to stay sane [:)][;)].. Gotta be one of the most interestin AAR's here .. hope my new PBEM turns out to be as much fun as this .
Good Luck David
Time to take advantage of the 'odd' movement system for yourself rather than being on the recieving end for a change ..
As an aside whats happening in china ? maybe i missed it but havnt seen any reports on that front for a while .. maybe a screenie pls .. Also well done on picking up the pieces from wobbly .. he did his best but was probably taking uppers come june 42 .. just to stay sane [:)][;)].. Gotta be one of the most interestin AAR's here .. hope my new PBEM turns out to be as much fun as this .
Good Luck David
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit 
RE: Drop back 5 yards and punt...
ORIGINAL: Rob Brennan UK
Oh boy that would be funny .. especially if hes pulled most of his a/c out and has no recon in india ! .. could have all sorts of fun. Hyderabad falling to a base force [:D]
Time to take advantage of the 'odd' movement system for yourself rather than being on the recieving end for a change ..
As an aside whats happening in china ? maybe i missed it but havnt seen any reports on that front for a while .. maybe a screenie pls .. Also well done on picking up the pieces from wobbly .. he did his best but was probably taking uppers come june 42 .. just to stay sane [:)][;)].. Gotta be one of the most interestin AAR's here .. hope my new PBEM turns out to be as much fun as this .
Good Luck David
If he uses the "w" key he will see the "trace" of my troops. My hope is that he isn't bothering because he still has lots of troops in India. (One would think that with the focus on Fog of War in the game that zone of control command might have been done differently.)
As far as China goes, PzB isn't advancing and I'm not retreating. We both have small groups of troops in the nomansland between our forces. I was able to pull all of the troops back that had been caught on that mountain in Central China and now all of my troops are resting up. I still have a few groups out to the East. I've left them in place as per my agreement with PzB - he considers the "Soviet Control" bug to be an unfair advantage for the Allies so I didn't move further into Manchuria.
Here is a look at China:

- Attachments
-
- ChinaOct42.jpg (93.82 KiB) Viewed 180 times
Bettys vs P-40Bs, cont. ...
Yes, as of October 14, PzB is definitely enjoying his strategy of sitting a bunch of small, well trained Betty squadrons at various bases around New Britain, protecting them with lots of well trained fighters and fighting his way through my CAP to hit my ships in the Gili-Gili to Lunga stretch. The only thing that is helping me right now is that we are having an incredibly high number of cloudy hexes and random chance is causing the clouds to hit many of my bases. But when PzB's Bettys get through they are getting past my P-40Bs and getting hits. They even put a torpedo into the Washington in Lunga, but fortunately the damage is minor. I've disbanded the TF and have the Washington in port under repair. It ought to be good as new in a short time.
My "big" news is that I got some reinforcements - a CVE with "teeth" in San Fran along with some DDs. So they are off to Pearl. I'm not sure what I will do with them for now, but it's nice to have some naval air to be able to send around. I also got four more SeaBee units and another RCT. My base building activity has slowed down recently, so having more engineers is good.
It turns out the Delhi is garrisoned, so I'm sending my nearby units up north to join the rest of the stragglers. My guess is that PzB has garrisoned all of India - there is no reason for him not to because he still has lots of troops around. Assuming that Rawalpindi is garrisoned too, I'm going to try to send my troops across the Himalayas to China or even the Soviet Union. I have no idea if they will make it, but I'm interested to see what happens. PzB is also still bombing Colombo regularly. I've now been able to pull all my Wellingtons back out, so this turn I'll try some naval attacks in the South China Sea.
PzB is also moving more forces into the vacinity of Java. He appears to be determined to cut it off completely. However he has also stopped trying to break my hold on Timor. I'm just resting my forces in that region for now. Until I get P-38s in quantities I'm not going to try a lot if I don't have to.
BTW - here is the "Feeble Attack of the Day" for October 14:
Day Air attack on TF at 64,90
Allied aircraft
B-26B Marauder x 47
No Allied losses
Japanese Ships
ML Naryu
ML Yaeyama
ML Shirataka
ML Takashima, Bomb hits 1, on fire
And I've had those B-26s flying missions for the past couple of months - they aren't rookies. No wonder PzB was rushing me to try to get another turn in this evening - he can't wait to see his Bettys fly off again...
Dave Baranyi
My "big" news is that I got some reinforcements - a CVE with "teeth" in San Fran along with some DDs. So they are off to Pearl. I'm not sure what I will do with them for now, but it's nice to have some naval air to be able to send around. I also got four more SeaBee units and another RCT. My base building activity has slowed down recently, so having more engineers is good.
It turns out the Delhi is garrisoned, so I'm sending my nearby units up north to join the rest of the stragglers. My guess is that PzB has garrisoned all of India - there is no reason for him not to because he still has lots of troops around. Assuming that Rawalpindi is garrisoned too, I'm going to try to send my troops across the Himalayas to China or even the Soviet Union. I have no idea if they will make it, but I'm interested to see what happens. PzB is also still bombing Colombo regularly. I've now been able to pull all my Wellingtons back out, so this turn I'll try some naval attacks in the South China Sea.
PzB is also moving more forces into the vacinity of Java. He appears to be determined to cut it off completely. However he has also stopped trying to break my hold on Timor. I'm just resting my forces in that region for now. Until I get P-38s in quantities I'm not going to try a lot if I don't have to.
BTW - here is the "Feeble Attack of the Day" for October 14:
Day Air attack on TF at 64,90
Allied aircraft
B-26B Marauder x 47
No Allied losses
Japanese Ships
ML Naryu
ML Yaeyama
ML Shirataka
ML Takashima, Bomb hits 1, on fire
And I've had those B-26s flying missions for the past couple of months - they aren't rookies. No wonder PzB was rushing me to try to get another turn in this evening - he can't wait to see his Bettys fly off again...

Dave Baranyi
Switching to v1.50
I downloaded v1.50 and installed it, then did all the setting as PzB sugeested, including both Japanese and Allied sub doctrines "off". However, when I ran the turn and checked the settings they read Japanese sub doctrine "on" and Allied sub doctrine "off". PzB needs to see if he can reset Japanese sub doctrine to "off". (Hopefully this won't result in the Allied sub doctrine setting reverting to "on" again...[&o])
I got a real scare at the beginning when all of my P-39s had their "upgrade" button grayed-out. But by going to the "all aircraft" button I was able to turn upgrades on for all of my planes, then adjust them as I went through to check them.
I also noticed that the "Player Defined Upgrades" button was "off" in the turn although I had set it to "on" before the start. That's probably why PzB can't change all of his planes. I believe that this can only be changed in a "fresh" game.
One of the old headaches of the game has been the autoassignment of air leaders when groups are split and rebuilt. Now that repairs are supposed to occur at the same rate, split or not, I recombined my air groups. But I had to check each leader because every group had the wrong type of leader - fighters got bomber leaders, bombers got fighter leaders and so on. I wonder if this will happen if I split the groups again?
So both the combat replay and the turn for October 15 appeared to run fine under v1.50. PzB attacked aggresively in lots of places. He now has a lot of bombers and fighters in position to hit many of my bases. He also moved a lot of fighters into Sorong:
Day Air attack on Sorong , at 42,74
Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 22
Allied aircraft
F-5A Lightning x 3
B-17E Fortress x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 4 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported
Runway hits 5
That's cool - I'll rest that squadron now and send it's "big brothers" at high altitude - 2 groups of B-17s and a group of B-24s - all experienced. I've been routinely been flying my bombers at relatively low altitudes because PzB hasn't had a lot of fighters on CAP. We'll see how well his fighters do when they have to climb to 30,000 feet.
PzB's Bettys also hit more transports, but that's okay, I'm almost done supplying those forward bases. Now I'll let the engineers build up the air fields so that I can start to put fighters in. I much prefer to use local CAP instead of LR CAP.
Dave Baranyi
I got a real scare at the beginning when all of my P-39s had their "upgrade" button grayed-out. But by going to the "all aircraft" button I was able to turn upgrades on for all of my planes, then adjust them as I went through to check them.
I also noticed that the "Player Defined Upgrades" button was "off" in the turn although I had set it to "on" before the start. That's probably why PzB can't change all of his planes. I believe that this can only be changed in a "fresh" game.
One of the old headaches of the game has been the autoassignment of air leaders when groups are split and rebuilt. Now that repairs are supposed to occur at the same rate, split or not, I recombined my air groups. But I had to check each leader because every group had the wrong type of leader - fighters got bomber leaders, bombers got fighter leaders and so on. I wonder if this will happen if I split the groups again?
So both the combat replay and the turn for October 15 appeared to run fine under v1.50. PzB attacked aggresively in lots of places. He now has a lot of bombers and fighters in position to hit many of my bases. He also moved a lot of fighters into Sorong:
Day Air attack on Sorong , at 42,74
Japanese aircraft
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 22
Allied aircraft
F-5A Lightning x 3
B-17E Fortress x 7
Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 4 damaged
Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 1 destroyed, 5 damaged
Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported
Runway hits 5
That's cool - I'll rest that squadron now and send it's "big brothers" at high altitude - 2 groups of B-17s and a group of B-24s - all experienced. I've been routinely been flying my bombers at relatively low altitudes because PzB hasn't had a lot of fighters on CAP. We'll see how well his fighters do when they have to climb to 30,000 feet.
PzB's Bettys also hit more transports, but that's okay, I'm almost done supplying those forward bases. Now I'll let the engineers build up the air fields so that I can start to put fighters in. I much prefer to use local CAP instead of LR CAP.
Dave Baranyi




