AFV upgrade should cost rail points

War in Russia is a free update of the old classic, available in our Downloads section.
Post Reply
Yogi Yohan
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Contact:

AFV upgrade should cost rail points

Post by Yogi Yohan »

It always disturbed me, when hundreds of tanks are just teleported from deep Russia to Berlin and back. Would it be possible to deduce a number of rail points proportional to the number of vehicles when an AFV upgrade is performed?

Since this was not forseen when the number of available rail points was determined, they might neeed to be slightly increased, though.

Special supply could also cost some rail points.

[ October 13, 2001: Message edited by: Yogi Yohan ]</p>
Lokioftheaesir
Posts: 548
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Oz
Contact:

Post by Lokioftheaesir »

Originally posted by Yogi Yohan:
It always disturbed me, when hundreds of tanks are just teleported from deep Russia to Berlin and back. Would it be possible to deduce a number of rail points proportional to the number of vehicles when an AFV upgrade is performed?

Since this was not forseen when the number of available rail points was determined, they might neeed to be slightly increased, though.

Special supply could also cost some rail points.

[ October 13, 2001: Message edited by: Yogi Yohan ]

Yogi

I agree, the cost should be the same as moving the replaced No of vehicles + the new vehicles as if they were an armored unit moving from replace hex X to Stavka or OKH. Not that much i know but how many little things can you let fall through the cracks in the system?
Special supply cost(in rail points) could be the amount of OP's lost to the HQ X distance between HQ and recieving unit. A big multiplier there but consistant with the amount of trucks and freight cars that would be used. As a frequent user of special supply i would gladly accept these restrictions.
Also when i move a HQ with 2000 planes attached(believe me i've done it often) they should not be ready for any action what so ever untill the next friendly turn. It would take AT LEAST a week to do such a thing.

Nick

Nick
Gentile or Jew
O you who turn the wheel and look to windward,
Consider Phlebas, who was once handsome and tall as you.
User avatar
frank1970
Posts: 941
Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Bayern

Post by frank1970 »

No, moving aircraft to another position was not an action that lasted one week. The movement has its costs, because the Op-points of the HQ are reduced when moving.
If you like what I said love me,if you dislike what I say ignore me!

"Extra Bavaria non est vita! Et sic est vita non est ita!"

Ed Cogburn
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Greeneville, Tennessee - GO VOLS!
Contact:

Post by Ed Cogburn »

Originally posted by Yogi Yohan:
It always disturbed me, when hundreds of tanks are just teleported from deep Russia to Berlin and back. Would it be possible to deduce a number of rail points proportional to the number of vehicles when an AFV upgrade is performed?


On the issues list, but I'll bet this such a small issue it may never be done.


Since this was not forseen when the number of available rail points was determined, they might neeed to be slightly increased, though.

Special supply could also cost some rail points.


I don't like the fact that both sides are given identical rail points, that must be wrong too. The Soviets, at least initially, did not have the same rail capacity as Germany.

I do like the idea of using rail points for some things though, unfortunately I don't see this happening given how difficult it might be to implement.
Mist
Posts: 483
Joined: Tue Nov 21, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Russia, Moscow

Post by Mist »

Originally posted by Yogi Yohan:
It always disturbed me, when hundreds of tanks are just teleported from deep Russia to Berlin and back. Would it be possible to deduce a number of rail points proportional to the number of vehicles when an AFV upgrade is performed?

Since this was not forseen when the number of available rail points was determined, they might neeed to be slightly increased, though.

Special supply could also cost some rail points.

[ October 13, 2001: Message edited by: Yogi Yohan ]

I like these ideas too. Though, there are sooo many good items in the issues list waiting for their turn to be implemented. Ed it right.
Yogi Yohan
Posts: 409
Joined: Fri Jul 28, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Contact:

Post by Yogi Yohan »

Originally posted by Ed Cogburn:

I don't like the fact that both sides are given identical rail points, that must be wrong too. The Soviets, at least initially, did not have the same rail capacity as Germany.

I agree. Ideally, rail capacity would be something that could be built in factories and lost (through air attacks, for example). But I guess it won't happen... <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
Post Reply

Return to “War In Russia: The Matrix Edition”