Asiatic Fleet HQ

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Gem35 »

Any of you Allied players care to comment on where you send this, if you manage to get it out safely from Manilla?

I am thinking either sending it back to pearl, or , as I love Brisbane as my main Harbor , I can send it there.
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
Yamato hugger
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Yamato hugger »

Personally I send it to one of the northern Aus ports. Whichever one I decide to make my main Sub base. It is my sub-repair-slave-master HQ [:D]
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Onime No Kyo »

How do you move them? Subs?
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
Tankerace
Posts: 5408
Joined: Fri Mar 21, 2003 12:23 pm
Location: Stillwater, OK, United States

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Tankerace »

The transports that are in Manila on Dec. 7. But you have to get them out quickly. Once a large base falls, anything leaving Manila is going to become a fish farm.
Designer of War Plan Orange
Allied Naval OOBer of Admiral's Edition
Naval Team Lead for War in the Med

Author of Million-Dollar Barrage: American Field Artillery in the Great War coming soon from OU Press.
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Onime No Kyo »

I surge all my transports out of the PI on turn one. By the time the place gets to falling, I dont even have enough subs around to pick up the peices (they all end up staging out of Darwin by then). Besides that, I have much better things to spend PPs on than that at the start of the game.
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
DrewMatrix
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 2:49 pm

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by DrewMatrix »

To get it out:

You only need to get a cadre out. When Manilla falls and all the Allied LCUs in the PI are destroyed, that cadre will become the main unit and regrow. By about Feb 43 or so it is full strength as I recall.

Where to put it:

I gather the biggest advantage to Fleet HQs is the repair bonus. So I put it in a large port where I send badly damaged major ships to save the time going to Pearl and returning. Noumea or Melbourne for example.
Image
Beezle - Rapidly running out of altitude, airspeed and ideas.
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Mr.Frag »

You only need to get a cadre out.

Telling people to game the system eh?

This is the very first thing I will trash in 1.6 so enjoy it while you can.
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Halsey »

Any base with a naval yard.[;)]

Sydney, not Brisbane.[;)]
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Onime No Kyo »

People already knew how to game the system. And how, pray tell, will you trash this, since its one of the basic rules of this entire engine?
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Mr.Frag »

People already knew how to game the system. And how, pray tell, will you trash this, since its one of the basic rules of this entire engine?

Fairly simple actually ... if unitsize < 15%, replacements = OFF [:'(]
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Halsey »

So what good are PP's then? If someone wants to spend 600 PP's to get out a couple of infantry squads, so what.

This pretty much takes PP's out of the picture except for officer replacement and keeping the RN around.

Everyone knows by now that it doesn't make any difference what HQ a unit belongs to.

How about nixing the random AI supply pull, and giving the players some control over where their logistical support is needed.[;)]
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Mr.Frag »

So what good are PP's then? If someone wants to spend 600 PP's to get out a couple of infantry squads, so what.

Read it carefully, if you take a good sized chunk out, fine ... if you sub transport 1 squad, bye bye.
User avatar
Jim D Burns
Posts: 3991
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2002 6:00 pm
Location: Salida, CA.

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Jim D Burns »

ORIGINAL: Gem35

Any of you Allied players care to comment on where you send this, if you manage to get it out safely from Manilla?

I am thinking either sending it back to pearl, or , as I love Brisbane as my main Harbor , I can send it there.

Personally I prefer to leave it and place it with the front line combat troops. The extra support squads help your untrained line units fight much better against the Japanese since most units lack sufficient support. I even move Mac’s HQ into the front if things develop on two fronts; the added support makes a huge difference for land combats. Or at least it appears to make a difference.

Jim
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Onime No Kyo »

ORIGINAL: Mr.Frag
People already knew how to game the system. And how, pray tell, will you trash this, since its one of the basic rules of this entire engine?

Fairly simple actually ... if unitsize < 15%, replacements = OFF [:'(]

Great. Thank you Frag. Now I cant have my units do stands to the death? My heritage balks at that. And what if it happened to be reduced to that of its own accord. For example, I have these 2 BFs in the PI that refuse to retreat and keep getting hammered around until they get chased back to CF. If they started off at 50%, after the first attack they are reduced to 25%, the second, 10% or so, by the time they make it to friendly lines theyre 0/4. So if I were to pull that legitimately damaged unit out I get punished for it? I could understand if the entire USFFE could not change HQ, but what have the Dutch done to you? Besides, there is nothing historically implausable about proud units that fought bravely in the PI being reconstituted, this is another way of doing it. Not like the damn thing will be good for anything but sucking up reinforcements for the next year.
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
User avatar
ADavidB
Posts: 2464
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by ADavidB »

This is the very first thing I will trash in 1.6 so enjoy it while you can.

Cool - you're going to get to work on the next rev? Congrats! Let us know what it is like to work on the code. Are you going to have much freedom with the "guts"?

Good luck -

Dave Baranyi
User avatar
Onime No Kyo
Posts: 16846
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2004 5:55 am

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Onime No Kyo »

Stop it Dave. Dont encourage him. He might just go and screw over the entire ASW deal just to spite Ron. [:D]
"Mighty is the Thread! Great are its works and insane are its inhabitants!" -Brother Mynok
pmelheck1
Posts: 615
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 12:04 pm
Location: Alabama

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by pmelheck1 »

Personally I don't allways view evacing HQ's as gaming the system, but more as evacuating the senior command staff. Something akin to dugout dougs trip from the P.I. to aust.
bradfordkay
Posts: 8591
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 8:39 am
Location: Olympia, WA

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by bradfordkay »

I've pointed out to Frag before that among the troops evacuated from the PI were the mechanics, both aircraft and naval. Obviously, these were not the whole units, but just a cadre of them. So he now wants to prevent us from being able to do what was historically done.

Many of us do not grab tiny portions af all units so they can be rebuilt, but we do grab tiny portions of a couple of important support units. This is certainly a pretty weak method of gaming the system, especially when what Frag is complaining about is easily handled by house rules.
fair winds,
Brad
User avatar
Mr.Frag
Posts: 11195
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 5:00 pm
Location: Purgatory

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by Mr.Frag »

I've pointed out to Frag before that among the troops evacuated from the PI were the mechanics, both aircraft and naval.

I have also pointed out back to you that the historical units these guys were merged in do already exist. You can't have it both ways ... either we nix the oob replacements and let you pull 'em or don't let you pull 'em as they are already represented in other units.
User avatar
michaelm75au
Posts: 12457
Joined: Sat May 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Asiatic Fleet HQ

Post by michaelm75au »

If the "<15%" rule is applied, the fragment should be disband (removed) and its devices added back to the replacement pool.
That way the "mechanics" can be merged into existing formations as replacements.

Michael
Michael
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”