Sitzkrieg im Westen

Gary Grigsby's World At War gives you the chance to really run a world war. History is yours to write and things may turn out differently. The Western Allies may be conquered by Germany, or Japan may defeat China. With you at the controls, leading the fates of nations and alliances. Take command in this dynamic turn-based game and test strategies that long-past generals and world leaders could only dream of. Now anything is possible in this new strategic offering from Matrix Games and 2 by 3 Games.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

Post Reply
Drax Kramer
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:42 pm
Location: Zagreb, Croatia

Sitzkrieg im Westen

Post by Drax Kramer »

I am sorry for my basic German, but Allied AI seems timid to me. I am playing Russians and Chinese and felt almost like Stalin in the real war. There was a bulk of Wehrmacht deployed in the East, with nothing but two militia in Western France. Yet, my AI allies kept sending Swordfish or some other tactical bombers to take pot shots at militia instead of doing even a raid in order to destroy French resources, factories and railroad and thus make German spend some supplies.

When Allies eventually landed, German AI did its mandatory feat of pulling out of Russia and preparing a Festung in West Germany. Allies seemed quite content to leave the actual fighting to me. Instead of taking virtually undefended Norway, Italy or Greece, it keeps pumping troops to France without even bothering to protect its convoys in the Mediterranean or North Sea that were slaughtered by submarines and Italian navy.

Why doesn't Allied AI bomb German naval units in the port? German AI did bomb the hell out of my Soviet fleets in the port of Caucasus.

I also noticed how Allied AI has no inclination what so ever to liberate northern region of Australia even when my Chinese captured Manchuria and opened the new front for Soviets.


Drax
User avatar
5cats
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:17 am

RE: Sitzkrieg im Westen

Post by 5cats »

Yup, WA AI is terribly timid.
I capture Mexico, sitting right next door to 1/3 of the USA. Does the AI defend itself? NO! It has a pile of guys in Washington (like 12-15 Infantry, tanks, fighters & etc), but doesn't move anything to SW or SC USA to try to stop me. I fight the 2 Militia in each, then the 1 & 3 in NW and NC USA next turn with little fear of retaliation.
*sigh*
Next patch guys! Give the WA AI some brains please!
No Will but Thy Will
No Law but the Laws You make
User avatar
Tac2i
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: WV USA

RE: Sitzkrieg im Westen

Post by Tac2i »

@5cats: Well, given the unlikely event of an Axis invasion of the USA I'm sure that part of the AI got low priority. If you are doing that well as the Axis, it is game over any how.
Tac2i (formerly webizen)
User avatar
5cats
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 7:17 am

RE: Sitzkrieg im Westen

Post by 5cats »

Well, I sure shouldn't be doing that well! I mean there is NO resistance at all.
Sad enough that I can take Panama and then Mexico without a fuss, but they should at least move some infantry down there automatically when Mexico falls.
Spread those units out! The threat of Amphibious Invasion in limited, but once Axis troops are in Mexico they are a very real threat! Anything is better than "pile them in Washinton & wait"
No Will but Thy Will
No Law but the Laws You make
User avatar
carnifex
Posts: 1294
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2002 8:47 pm
Location: Latitude 40° 48' 43N Longtitude 74° 7' 29W

RE: Sitzkrieg im Westen

Post by carnifex »

You're forgetting the first rule of playing vs. any AI:

No funny stuff!
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's World at War”