Surrender of Australia in WITP

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by Speedysteve »

Terminus many thanks. Explains why i've never heard of it
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by Nikademus »

Except that Dexter is the hero and Mandark is the arch-nemesis. Him and Dee Dee

I'm betting Frag looks like Dexter........ [;)]
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by Speedysteve »

Agreed [;)]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by Terminus »

ORIGINAL: Nikademus

Except that Dexter is the hero and Mandark is the arch-nemesis. Him and Dee Dee

That's sort of what I said...

It is an American cartoon, "Dexter's Laboratory", I think it's called. Mandark is probably the hero (Dexter's) archnemesisisisisis...

If I'd put an "'s" after Dexter, it would have been clearer.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by Nikademus »

(Mandark Laugh)
(Adjust's eyeglasses)

Your use of improper syntex confused me momentarily. [:'(] [;)]
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by pompack »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Like I said earlier, Montgomery was fixated on Market-Garden at this time, which swallowed up ALL of British 2nd Army. It was HIS BIG MOMENT (tm), the time to vindicate his "One Thrust" strategy, and a piffling port on the Belgian coast wasn't going to take that away from him.

Montgomery wasn't stupid, but, like Churchill, Patton, McArthur, Rommel and MANY others, was desperate to look good in history.

Monty wasn't stupid, but he was excessively land-minded. He was well aware that supply comes from ports. He just never thought much about how the supply got into the ports; in any case that was a navy problem. From the record, it really looks like he never thought about the need to clear the estuary at all.
User avatar
rtrapasso
Posts: 22655
Joined: Tue Sep 03, 2002 4:31 am

RE: Surrender of Australia in WITP

Post by rtrapasso »

ORIGINAL: pompack

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Like I said earlier, Montgomery was fixated on Market-Garden at this time, which swallowed up ALL of British 2nd Army. It was HIS BIG MOMENT (tm), the time to vindicate his "One Thrust" strategy, and a piffling port on the Belgian coast wasn't going to take that away from him.

Montgomery wasn't stupid, but, like Churchill, Patton, McArthur, Rommel and MANY others, was desperate to look good in history.

Monty wasn't stupid, but he was excessively land-minded. He was well aware that supply comes from ports. He just never thought much about how the supply got into the ports; in any case that was a navy problem. From the record, it really looks like he never thought about the need to clear the estuary at all.


Told it is important to clear the estuary by his superior officer, he ignored the warning. He (and the Allies in general) had suffered supply problems much of the way across France, and he (apparently) ignores the supply problem. I dunno if it means he was stupid, but gosh, "excessively land-minded" seems to be a rather tame description for this defect.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”