Location of US Carriers???

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
akdreemer
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:43 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Contact:

Location of US Carriers???

Post by akdreemer »

Okay everyone, a bit of a history lesson is on order. Can someone explain where precisely the USS Enterprise and USS Lexington Task Forces are located at dawn, 7 Dec 41?? At the end of the first turn CHS the Enterprise is some 800+ miles away heading away from Oahu. Historically, at dawn she was some 215 miles W/SW of Oahu heading for Pearl... Can anyone please explain the discrepency?? [:-]



Image
Attachments
enterprise_tf_t1.jpg
enterprise_tf_t1.jpg (105.94 KiB) Viewed 55 times
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: AlaskanWarrior

Okay everyone, a bit of a history lesson is on order. Can someone explain where precisely the USS Enterprise and USS Lexington Task Forces are located at dawn, 7 Dec 41?? At the end of the first turn CHS the Enterprise is some 800+ miles away heading away from Oahu. Historically, at dawn she was some 215 miles W/SW of Oahu heading for Pearl... Can anyone please explain the discrepency?? [:-]



Image

This is a concession to game mechanics and is inherited from Scenario 15. If the carriers are placed in their historical positions they are found and un-historically destroyed by the Japanese carrier force.
User avatar
akdreemer
Posts: 1028
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 12:43 am
Location: Anchorage, Alaska
Contact:

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by akdreemer »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: AlaskanWarrior

Okay everyone, a bit of a history lesson is on order. Can someone explain where precisely the USS Enterprise and USS Lexington Task Forces are located at dawn, 7 Dec 41?? At the end of the first turn CHS the Enterprise is some 800+ miles away heading away from Oahu. Historically, at dawn she was some 215 miles W/SW of Oahu heading for Pearl... Can anyone please explain the discrepency?? [:-]



This is a concession to game mechanics and is inherited from Scenario 15. If the carriers are placed in their historical positions they are found and un-historically destroyed by the Japanese carrier force.

Oh great, all the work that went into this and this is the best solution we can come up with? I would at least have the Big E hanging around Johnston Is., and not way to the west where she would conceivable be able to interfere with the Wake Island operation. May place her in a holding pattern 2 to 3 hexes E/NE of Johnston might be better? Far enough to keep her from getting "sunk".
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by Don Bowen »

Oh great, all the work that went into this and this is the best solution we can come up with?

Yup!
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by Ron Saueracker »

Best solution would be to add her to the Dec 8th or 9th reinforcement arrival at PH but some sort of house rule would need be made to not have Japanese player "game" this knowledge.

Don's solution is great to but the opposing players need to refrain from gaming the knowledge as well.
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Best solution would be to add her to the Dec 8th or 9th reinforcement arrival at PH but some sort of house rule would need be made to not have Japanese player "game" this knowledge.

Don's solution is great to but the opposing players need to refrain from gaming the knowledge as well.

Actually this implementation is mostly Matrix - scenario 15. We experimented with purely historical placements but the game's "reaction" function made the Japanese carriers move West or even Southwest of Hawaii to strike the U.S. carriers. No way Nagumo would have been so foolish.

Finally we went back to the Matrix solution, changing it only so that Lexington does not make an non-historical "raid" on the Japanese Wake Invasion Force.
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Best solution would be to add her to the Dec 8th or 9th reinforcement arrival at PH but some sort of house rule would need be made to not have Japanese player "game" this knowledge.

Don's solution is great to but the opposing players need to refrain from gaming the knowledge as well.

Actually this implementation is mostly Matrix - scenario 15. We experimented with purely historical placements but the game's "reaction" function made the Japanese carriers move West or even Southwest of Hawaii to strike the U.S. carriers. No way Nagumo would have been so foolish.

Finally we went back to the Matrix solution, changing it only so that Lexington does not make an non-historical "raid" on the Japanese Wake Invasion Force.

Works for me. The first few months are always weird because all locs are known...the players have to curb their enthusiasm for anything to even vaguely resemble "plausable".
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Location of US Carriers???

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

Best solution would be to add her to the Dec 8th or 9th reinforcement arrival at PH but some sort of house rule would need be made to not have Japanese player "game" this knowledge.

Don's solution is great to but the opposing players need to refrain from gaming the knowledge as well.

Actually this implementation is mostly Matrix - scenario 15. We experimented with purely historical placements but the game's "reaction" function made the Japanese carriers move West or even Southwest of Hawaii to strike the U.S. carriers. No way Nagumo would have been so foolish.

Finally we went back to the Matrix solution, changing it only so that Lexington does not make an non-historical "raid" on the Japanese Wake Invasion Force.

Works for me. The first few months are always weird because all locs are known...the players have to curb their enthusiasm for anything to even vaguely resemble "plausable".
Excellent point Ron...I am for leaving the units at the present locations in this instance..The FOW can take over the next day..
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”