Naval annihilation in 1941

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

fdeutsch
Posts: 390
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 9:51 am

Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by fdeutsch »

Here's the battle who have won it?

Day Time Surface Combat, near Kendari at 33,71

Japanese aircraft
no flights

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
E13A1 Jake: 2 destroyed
F1M2 Pete: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
SOC-3 Seagull: 6 destroyed
C.XI-W: 3 destroyed

Japanese Ships
CA Myoko, Shell hits 53, and is sunk
CA Haguro, Shell hits 55, on fire, heavy damage
CA Nachi, Shell hits 45, on fire, heavy damage
DD Yamakaze, Shell hits 22, and is sunk
DD Kawakaze, Shell hits 30, and is sunk
DD Umikaze, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
DD Suzukaze, Shell hits 41, and is sunk
DD Shiokaze, Shell hits 22, and is sunk

Allied Ships
CA Houston, Shell hits 14, and is sunk
CL Java, Shell hits 11, on fire, heavy damage
CL De Ruyter, Shell hits 18, and is sunk
CL Tromp, Shell hits 4, on fire
CL Marblehead, Shell hits 2
CL Boise, Shell hits 12, on fire
DD Alden, Shell hits 2, and is sunk
DD Edsall, Shell hits 6, and is sunk
DD John D. Edwards, Shell hits 7, and is sunk
DD Paul Jones, Shell hits 8, and is sunk
DD Parrott, Shell hits 18, and is sunk
DD Whipple, Shell hits 5, and is sunk
DD Stewart, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
DD Evertsen, Shell hits 21, and is sunk
A damaged ship is only a missed opportunity
harrer
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:34 am

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by harrer »

the allied I think, see the VP, it isn't a 4 to 1 for the japanese

Harrer [;)]
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by spence »

Admiral Pyrrhus in command on both sides it seems.
harrer
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:34 am

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by harrer »

ORIGINAL: spence

Admiral Pyrrhus in command on both sides it seems.

[:D]

He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course [;)]

Harrer
spence
Posts: 5421
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2003 6:56 am
Location: Vancouver, Washington

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by spence »

He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course

Oh sure, I can see the combat report now:

"Troops landing across the beach at Funafuti
Coastal guns are non-existent
10,875 casualties reported"

[:D]
User avatar
cookie monster
Posts: 1690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 10:09 am
Location: Birmingham,England

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by cookie monster »

Looks like allies won. Although it depends upon the reason for the battle.

The allied CA is an auto replacement and DD's are ten a penny, depends on your game though how significant the result is.

Musta been a good battle to watch[8D]
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Andy Mac »

Allies.

Most CL's were afloat at the end and the DDD#s were mostly Flushdeckers.

Likley all three IJN CA's will sink as well
User avatar
Bradley7735
Posts: 2073
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 8:51 pm

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Bradley7735 »

wow. Not 1 torpedo hit. I must remember to try for daylight fights as allies.

I agree, allies won. Probably 3 heavies to 1 heavy and 1 light on the cruiser sunk ratio. 5 to 8 on DD's, but mostly flush decker. At worst, it's a tie, which still means allies won. (Japan must win for a true win. any tie is really a win for the allies.)
The older I get, the better I was.
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Charbroiled »

Looks like a good site for future recreational diving (virtual, of course)
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
harrer
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:34 am

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by harrer »

ORIGINAL: spence
He should reaffect him to a transport TF right now or something like that .. far away from the front .. if not dead of course

Oh sure, I can see the combat report now:

"Troops landing across the beach at Funafuti
Coastal guns are non-existent
10,875 casualties reported"

[:D]



I said far away from the front [:'(]

Harrer [;)]
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Iridium »

It's that damn Boise (Brooklyn class) that fragged alot of those Japanese ships...Something about 15 x 6"/47 guns...IIRC it's armored like a CA almost too, the reasoning for classifying it as a CL was the gun size though if memory serves. It displaced 9,700 tons, which to me is well into the CA weight catagory.

What a waste of good Japanese CA's, oh well...[:'(]
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
harrer
Posts: 753
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 8:34 am

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by harrer »

ORIGINAL: Iridium

It's that damn Boise (Brooklyn class) that fragged alot of those Japanese ships...Something about 15 x 6"/47 guns...IIRC it's armored like a CA almost too, the reasoning for classifying it as a CL was the gun size though if memory serves. It displaced 9,700 tons, which to me is well into the CA weight catagory.

What a waste of good Japanese CA's, oh well...[:'(]

heard some things like that about that ship .. a good ship for a lot of people .. why not when I'm playing the allied ? [:o][:D]

Harrer [;)]
User avatar
SuperKing
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2005 5:52 pm
Location: Split,Croatia
Contact:

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by SuperKing »

all of his ships sunk next turn,and I kept one CA....well at least something.By the way fdeutch,do you think Lady Lex will escape?(enterprise already gone)?My bet is two turns the most[:'(]& she'll hit the bottom
Keyes: By your actions, sir, you are risking the future of the human race!
General Sline: To guarantee the American way of life? I'm willing to take that risk.
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by RUPD3658 »

Trading 1 for 2 as the Allies is a good deal. Japan gets few replacement ships as the game goes on while the Allies get more then they know what to do with.

I call this a victory for the Allies although the sailors on these particular ships may disagree....
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
Yamato hugger
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Yamato hugger »

Whoever was trying to keep the other guy from doing what he wanted to do won.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Speedysteve »

You sure it wasn't proton torpedo launchers on Boise?

They are deadly and I mean DEADLY [:D]
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
LargeSlowTarget
Posts: 4982
Joined: Sat Sep 23, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hessen, Germany - now living in France

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by LargeSlowTarget »

Jeez, the Admirals in charge must have been an aggressive lot - looks like they were of the 'to the last shell' type.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Speedysteve »

Maybe Hitler was in charge for both sides?

"No retreat, no surrender. To the last shell. I don't care if you've been hit 45 times. Fire that gun."
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by DuckofTindalos »

"But my Führer, all our guns are destroyed! All we have left is this slingshot! Then fire IT, dammit!"[:D]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Speedysteve
Posts: 15975
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Reading, England

RE: Naval annihilation in 1941

Post by Speedysteve »

"After the slingshot close for ramming. Even if only 1 boiler is working properly. Close and then ram them. Then throw yourself at them"
WitE 2 Tester
WitE Tester
BTR/BoB Tester
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”