Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Crown of Glory: Europe in the Age of Napoleon, the player controls one of the crowned potentates of Europe in the Napoleonic Era, wielding authority over his nation's military strategy, economic development, diplomatic relations, and social organization. It is a very thorough simulation of the entire Napoleonic Era - spanning from 1799 to 1820, from the dockyards in Lisbon to the frozen wastes of Holy Mother Russia.

Moderators: Gil R., ericbabe

User avatar
Mr. Z
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:33 pm

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by Mr. Z »

Take a screenshot of the slider bars locked. Then move one, and show us the screenshot of the result.
Hugo Olsson
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2004 3:59 pm

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by Hugo Olsson »

Finland was christianized by Sweden in the 1200's and had been a part of Sweden ever since. Virtually all towns in Finland were founded by swedish kings, the finns had representation in the swedish parliament from the 1500's and the second university in Sweden was founded in Abo (Turkku) in 1640. While the rural population was almost exclusively finnish, the swedes dominated in the towns. Finland was quite simply a province in Sweden.

So, like Frodon I don't understand why Finland is being portrayed as a protectorate in the game. Change, plz?

Second, the feudal level for Sweden is set relatively high, at 50%. This too seems a bit strange as Sweden never was feudalized in the way continental Europe, and even Denmark, were. Most of the peasants owned their own land, paid (steep) taxes to the king and they had their own representation in parliament as the fourth estate. There were swedish nobles, but, in 1521 the danish king Valdemar the tyrant chopped off the heads of all the major ones except one - who proceeded to rebel, liberate the country and crown himself king Gustav Vasa.

(Ok this is getting a bit long but I'm having fun so I'll carry on. I'll get to the point shortly. And yes, I am swedish.)

Seeing that Valdemar had done away with most of the internal opposition Gustav was able to centralize power to a degree I think was unmatched in Europe during the 16th century. This gave Sweden military capacity out of proportion to its population, and this centralization, or un-feudalization was the foundation on which Sweden's status as Great Power during the 17th and early 18th centuries built.

Once the last absolute monarch, Charles XII, had been shot with a uniform button in 1718, Sweden became a constitutional monarchy, ruled by bickering political parties. The government had to manufacture a stamp to get the king's signature for their decisions (the king being far too occupied with turning snuff-boxes to be bothered with simple politics). Attempts were made to revitalize the country with government-sponsored investments in manufacturing and trading, but there wasn't enough capital to go around, and the swedes were to few and poor.

The point? I think Sweden's feudal level could be set to the same level Britain has in 1792, and Finland could be a domestic province of Sweden. To compensate for this I guess the provincial incomes might be lowered, and possibly the abilities of the swedish diplomats could be weakened. (Denmark voluntarily submitting to Sweden? Noooooo way...)
User avatar
Mr. Z
Posts: 1047
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 5:33 pm

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by Mr. Z »

The point? I think Sweden's feudal level could be set to the same level Britain has in 1792, and Finland could be a domestic province of Sweden. To compensate for this I guess the provincial incomes might be lowered, and possibly the abilities of the swedish diplomats could be weakened. (Denmark voluntarily submitting to Sweden? Noooooo way...)
Well, I agree about Finland. Eric will have to decide what changes to make to the Feudal level and whatnot.
User avatar
ahauschild
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:52 pm

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by ahauschild »

Would be nice during the Upgrade window to show also on the bottom one box with current upgrades allready, and another box with the upgrade explanation when you click on it. I hate having to dig out the manual to read up on this things while playing, that kind of info would be great to have from the start.

Also on the Build screens for units. would be nice if you right clicked on a unit it would give you the explanation and special rules for it in a pop up
<< Let wars be only in our mind and imagination, for nobody should face this horror areal >>
Jordan
Posts: 171
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: California, USA

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by Jordan »

Must you have an enforced alliance before you can demand that a defeated country lend you troops? If not, I think you should. This feature is open to exploitation.

Also, is there a time limit, similar to the other clauses, for removing a leader? After sitting in the penalty box for a specified time period they should be allowed to return. If Napoleon is removed he should have a 5% cumulative chance each month after the treaty is ratified of returning to France (and thereby breaking the treaty). France shoudn't lose glory points for the break...maybe they should even gain some.
User avatar
nukkxx5058
Posts: 3141
Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:57 pm
Location: France

RE: Wish List: Suggestions for a future patch

Post by nukkxx5058 »

i continue my suggestions list (some have probably been already mentioned but it's never bad to repeat [:D] :

1- one additional zoom OUT to cover at least 80percent of the map is necessary (to have a global picture better than the mini-map

2- possibility to change country colors on strategic map

3- improve the "view trade routes" mode wich is absolutely unclear and considerably slows down the PC)

4- improve the economic and trades reports which are unclear
Winner of the first edition of the Command: Modern Operations COMPLEX PBEM Tournament (IKE) (April 2022) :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Crown of Glory”