ORIGINAL: Speedy
[;)]
English Lurker......
Enter the Unreal Tournament 2004 forum and prepare to eat a Rocket.
[:'(]
Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami
ORIGINAL: Speedy
[;)]
ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker
quote:
ORIGINAL: castor troy
I think my biggest problem is, that I´ve got the same opinion like Ron Saueracker! Every thread I´ve read so far in a year where Ron posted, he was mowed down by 10 others.
Nikademus:
A picture is worth a thousand words :
This is the kind of crap which has kept the game so innaccurate on so many levels. Those who want to fix the game vs those who like to feather their nest and solidify their place for some future project. Result...mediocrity. Oh well...[8|]
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
ORIGINAL: Speedy
[;)]
English Lurker......
Enter the Unreal Tournament 2004 forum and prepare to eat a Rocket.
[:'(]
ORIGINAL: Speedy
Shh. If we're quiet the mods may turn a blind eye. Actually, how do you turn a blind eye and what the point if its blind you don't need to turn it? [;)]
ORIGINAL: Speedy
[
Muhahahaha. Foolish Nikademon. Enter thy world and get Fragged. Err doesn't sound right on this forum [:D]
ORIGINAL: Nikademus
ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker
Well, ya asked for it with the shot.[;)]
And what shot was that Ron? If Castor wants to think that people disagree with him because he's an ersatz you and people with contrary opinions are simply interested in mowing him down as a result, thats his right. Me, such a silly statement deserves only a [8|]
Kind of like your comment about WitP being "medicore"
[8|][8|][8|][8|][8|]
[:'(]




ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker
The way I read his post (the grammar is not 100% so it hurts his intent on a few occasions) was that because he was critical, he immediately got swarmed by the "warm and fuzzies". Because he mentioned me, your comment came across as well, pretty darn durogatory.
ORIGINAL: treespider
I just listed NINE Japanese CV's sunk with comparable damge to the original post.

ORIGINAL: Nikademus
ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker
The way I read his post (the grammar is not 100% so it hurts his intent on a few occasions) was that because he was critical, he immediately got swarmed by the "warm and fuzzies". Because he mentioned me, your comment came across as well, pretty darn durogatory.
[8|] is pretty darned derogatory....
ok.
[8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|] [8|]
[:)]


ORIGINAL: Panzer76
ORIGINAL: treespider
I just listed NINE Japanese CV's sunk with comparable damge to the original post.
I didn't notice that the original poster's CVs were struck by FOUR torpedos or cought with fuelled airplanes, and bombs lying all over their deck. Must be my bad.
Sunk: At 1703 while preparing to launch strike against enemy carrier, attacked by thirteen enemy dive bombers. Four direct bomb hits received, all closely spaced. The first three landed in a row on the fore part of the flight deck, the blast of the nearest flinging the forward elevator bodily against the island. The fourth bomb struck amidships beside the bridge. The hits set off furious fires and induced explosions among aircraft being scheduled to launch in an hour. Though initially able to maintain 28 knots and withdraw to the west, the fires gain steadily. At 2123 goes dead in the water, and KAZAGUMO and MAKIGUMO detached to stand by. At 0158 a major induced explosion occurs, and hope is lost. Abandon ship is ordered, and ComCarDiv 2 Yamaguchi gives a farewell speech, and remains aboard with Captain Kaku Tomeo. Yamaguchi orders the carrier scuttled, and after survivors removed by KAZAGUMO and MAKIGUMO, at 0510 scuttled by MAKIGUMO with one torpedo in the starboard side opposite the bridge. (Scuttling position 31-38'N, 178-51'W). The MAKIGUMO then withdraws without confirming the sinking. Therafter, at 0630 a plane from HOSHO finds and photographs HIRYU still afloat and with survivors clearly seen still aboard. The destroyer TANIKAZE is dispatched, but before she arrives, the carrier at 0912 upended and sank by the bow in a position between 240 - 260 miles NW from Midway. Of the 70 men marooned aboard, only thirty-five are eventually rescued by the U.S. Navy, including her Chief Engineer. A total of 418 officers, petty officers and men are listed as lost with the carrier, but this does not appear to exclude the POWs, so the actual figure would be 383 lost.
18 August 1944:
Sunk: Off Cape Bolinao, Luzon, at 2222 struck in starboard quarter by one torpedo of two fired by USS RASHER. The torpedo struck the ship's aft av-gas tank which exploded violently, and the carrier was engulfed in explosions and fires. At few minutes later an oil tank amidships in the port side exploded with tremendous force, and it was thought by some to be another torpedo hit. Captain Sugino ordered abandon ship, but soon after, TAIYO was wracked by another final huge explosion and sank at 2248 in position 18-10'N, 120-22'E. Because of the fire and speed of sinking, most of her crew were lost. Approximately 747 officers and men perished; but by some miracle, Captain Sugino Shuichi was among the less than 100 survivors.
ORIGINAL: treespider
ORIGINAL: Panzer76
ORIGINAL: treespider
I just listed NINE Japanese CV's sunk with comparable damge to the original post.
I didn't notice that the original poster's CVs were struck by FOUR torpedos or cought with fuelled airplanes, and bombs lying all over their deck. Must be my bad.
Other than at Midway, the other 5 or 6 real life CV's that were sunk with comparable damage didn't either. In addition, were bombs strewn all over the place and planes refeuling on the 4th Jap CV at Midway?
HIRYUSunk: At 1703 while preparing to launch strike against enemy carrier, attacked by thirteen enemy dive bombers. Four direct bomb hits received, all closely spaced. The first three landed in a row on the fore part of the flight deck, the blast of the nearest flinging the forward elevator bodily against the island. The fourth bomb struck amidships beside the bridge. The hits set off furious fires and induced explosions among aircraft being scheduled to launch in an hour. Though initially able to maintain 28 knots and withdraw to the west, the fires gain steadily. At 2123 goes dead in the water, and KAZAGUMO and MAKIGUMO detached to stand by. At 0158 a major induced explosion occurs, and hope is lost. Abandon ship is ordered, and ComCarDiv 2 Yamaguchi gives a farewell speech, and remains aboard with Captain Kaku Tomeo. Yamaguchi orders the carrier scuttled, and after survivors removed by KAZAGUMO and MAKIGUMO, at 0510 scuttled by MAKIGUMO with one torpedo in the starboard side opposite the bridge. (Scuttling position 31-38'N, 178-51'W). The MAKIGUMO then withdraws without confirming the sinking. Therafter, at 0630 a plane from HOSHO finds and photographs HIRYU still afloat and with survivors clearly seen still aboard. The destroyer TANIKAZE is dispatched, but before she arrives, the carrier at 0912 upended and sank by the bow in a position between 240 - 260 miles NW from Midway. Of the 70 men marooned aboard, only thirty-five are eventually rescued by the U.S. Navy, including her Chief Engineer. A total of 418 officers, petty officers and men are listed as lost with the carrier, but this does not appear to exclude the POWs, so the actual figure would be 383 lost.
My only point from all of these historical examples was that Japanese CV's appear to be extremely vunerable. The game depicts this through flooding damage. Perhaps it was easier to code than providing code to make Japanese CV's more suseptible to Critical hits as appears to be the historical case.
I've read accounts where a torpedo hit a ship right on a substantial beam (I-beam or what not) and suffered much less damage as a result (versus a complete penetration). That's how I tend to think of teh example you cite here.ORIGINAL: Nikademus
For example, i've often had ships "roll" very favorable when struck by a torpedo (i.e. small amount of SYS and FLT damage) I interpret such a result as the torp having struck in a non critical area, such as a bow hit.