3 x 3 Multiplayer game - Closed

Post here to meet players for PBM games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
MarcA
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:04 pm
Location: England

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by MarcA »

Just one things guys, I see you wanted to use 1.6. Well I have some experience with ghosts and they are a PItA. I would strongly recommend we upgrade to 1.602, not 1.6.

It is avaiable in the download section and Frag recommends we all use it, even though it is still a beta. He says 1.7 is unlikely to be released for a long time. 1.602 also fixes problems with whole divisions disappearing which would certainly have a negative effect on the game.

I am sure there are plenty of new bugs in 1.602 but can they be worse than loosing whole divsions without warning.

Alex do you want to start your machinations, assigning areas of command, etc. We might as well get moving. I haven't played Japan before so would like some time to familiarise msyelf with what I own. If you let me know where you want me I will start having a poke around.

Marc
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Good luck gents. I suspect you will have a blast. I would suggest no more than 3 per side so you dont impair game speed.

And, of course, make sure everyone signs the prenuptial agreement. [:'(]
Image
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: mantill

Just one things guys, I see you wanted to use 1.6. Well I have some experience with ghosts and they are a PItA. I would strongly recommend we upgrade to 1.602, not 1.6.

It is avaiable in the download section and Frag recommends we all use it, even though it is still a beta. He says 1.7 is unlikely to be released for a long time. 1.602 also fixes problems with whole divisions disappearing which would certainly have a negative effect on the game.

I am sure there are plenty of new bugs in 1.602 but can they be worse than loosing whole divsions without warning.

Alex do you want to start your machinations, assigning areas of command, etc. We might as well get moving. I haven't played Japan before so would like some time to familiarise msyelf with what I own. If you let me know where you want me I will start having a poke around.

Marc


Hi Marc!

I definitely don't want to loose divisions. I checked the WitP space on Matrix games and only saw patches up to 1.6. Where can we all get 1.602?

[:)]

Gary
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Nomad »

I just went to the members area and downloaded 1.602.

That said, AlexCobra stated he would not be able to upgrade to 1.602.

Alex, do you have enough disk space to put two different installs on? That is what I do, I have an install for
each of my 4 games. That way nothing gets confused.
AlexCobra
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:12 am
Location: Russia

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by AlexCobra »

Well, if u'r going to upgrade to 1.602, u gonna lose me. I definitely said that I can't use beta-version patches available through members area, so I'll stay on 1.6 anyway (well, until next official patch comes out[:)]). If u wanna know the exact reasons, I'll PM it or e-mail it. Sorry. And, btw, the ghost bug affects only units touched with 'follow' command, and I use only 'march' command, so there's no difficulties for me.
We are the mighty Allies, we will win no matter what they try.

Heh... u better prove it, man[;)]

Ok, I suppose Scott will take Japs, so we are ready for launch... If no other circumstances will appear, I'll start the game tonight, taking last edited preferences. It'll be 1.6 and with historical 1st turn I'll send it strait to opponents (exactly to Gary). Now we should consider who's gonna be the first reciver of opponent's turn and that person should deliver it to other members of High Staff... And Feurer, mantill, I'll send u mail about the common staff.
And, of course, make sure everyone signs the prenuptial agreement.

Highly appreciate your approval, C. M. Read your AAR's - they'r fantastic![8D]

Alex.
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by FeurerKrieg »

ORIGINAL: AlexCobra

Well, if u'r going to upgrade to 1.602, u gonna lose me. I definitely said that I can't use beta-version patches available through members area, so I'll stay on 1.6 anyway (well, until next official patch comes out[:)]). If u wanna know the exact reasons, I'll PM it or e-mail it. Sorry. And, btw, the ghost bug affects only units touched with 'follow' command, and I use only 'march' command, so there's no difficulties for me.
We are the mighty Allies, we will win no matter what they try.

Heh... u better prove it, man[;)]

Ok, I suppose Scott will take Japs, so we are ready for launch... If no other circumstances will appear, I'll start the game tonight, taking last edited preferences. It'll be 1.6 and with historical 1st turn I'll send it strait to opponents (exactly to Gary). Now we should consider who's gonna be the first reciver of opponent's turn and that person should deliver it to other members of High Staff... And Feurer, mantill, I'll send u mail about the common staff.
And, of course, make sure everyone signs the prenuptial agreement.

Highly appreciate your approval, C. M. Read your AAR's - they'r fantastic![8D]

Alex.


I assume you mean Scott will take allies. Also, any chance you can run two installs? One with 1.6 and one on 1.602? With the river shock attack rules, using the follow command is nearly mandatory on river assualts. Won't affect me so much, if I'm in the Pacific, but for those Burma/Hong Kong/China type areas, might be a bigger issue.
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: AlexCobra

Well, if u'r going to upgrade to 1.602, u gonna lose me. I definitely said that I can't use beta-version patches available through members area, so I'll stay on 1.6 anyway (well, until next official patch comes out[:)]). If u wanna know the exact reasons, I'll PM it or e-mail it. Sorry. And, btw, the ghost bug affects only units touched with 'follow' command, and I use only 'march' command, so there's no difficulties for me.

Alex.

Hi everyone!

How about we not use the 1.602 patch and just use march instead of follow (make it a house rule)? I don't think any of us want to loose Alex.

Alternatively, is it possible for the rest of us to be on 1.602 and for him to play using 1.6?

Does anyone have ideas here on how we can resolve this situation?

[:)] [:(]

Gary

edit: PS. Just now saw Feurer Krieg's reply to Alex.
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by FeurerKrieg »

I can run two installs on my machine, so it isn't a problem for me to play 1.6 if Alex cannot run 1.602. As I said, it really doesn't impact me, but whoever is running the land campaigns may be of a different opinion.
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by scott64 »

Thanks [:)]
I do not care how we do it but it will be done. I think we should stick with 1.6 because I am on another (3x3 Fear and Loathing Jap style)[:'(] and am not sure if they want to upgrade or not. my email is s dot kime at comcast dot net.
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

I can run two installs on my machine, so it isn't a problem for me to play 1.6 if Alex cannot run 1.602. As I said, it really doesn't impact me, but whoever is running the land campaigns may be of a different opinion.

Hi Feurer Krieg!

I haven't upgraded to 1.602 yet so I can just stay at 1.6 if need be.

I also propose we take C. M.'s advice and put a limit on the game at 3 x 3.

[:)]

Gary
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Nomad »

I have the Allies on the ground in the CBI. I do not care whether we use 1.6 or 1.602. Let's just use 1.6 and get moving on this. [:)]
User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by scott64 »

Allied Commander for DEI, Australia, New Zealand, and Southwest Pacific reporting in.[:)][8D][:'(]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Nomad »

ORIGINAL: scott1964

Allied Commander for DEI, Australia, New Zealand, and Southwest Pacific reporting in.[:)][8D][:'(]

Don't fortget the PI. [:-] It might be very important. [8D]

User avatar
scott64
Posts: 4019
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:34 pm
Location: Colorado
Contact:

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by scott64 »

That would be very benificial to them if We did not do anything [X(][:-][:'(]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me


Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !! :)

http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Nomad »

The only real problem is that there just is not a lot we can do. It is nice to save some ships and aircraft but even if we don't, We still win [:D]
User avatar
FeurerKrieg
Posts: 3400
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:43 pm
Location: Denver, CO

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by FeurerKrieg »

Sounds like we are pretty much ready to roll then. Alex/Mantill - you guys okay with me doing 4th, Southeast and the sub fleets?
Image
Upper portion used with permission of www.subart.net, copyright John Meeks
User avatar
MarcA
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:04 pm
Location: England

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by MarcA »

v1.6 it is then. Just no crying when the 2nd US marines disappear [:'(]

A point about player orders, we should set the order we handle turns in order of GMT, depending on where there last allied player is located. If that makes sense. So if the hand it over at GMT-6 it would go to Bob at GMT-8 then Alex GMT+3 then me GMT, otherwise we could be waiting 2 days for us to do our turns as it would keep arriving when we have gone to bed. If we do it this way we stand the best chance of getting a turn per day
Image
User avatar
MarcA
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 12:04 pm
Location: England

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by MarcA »

ORIGINAL: Feurer Krieg

Sounds like we are pretty much ready to roll then. Alex/Mantill - you guys okay with me doing 4th, Southeast and the sub fleets?

No problem here
Image
AlexCobra
Posts: 86
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:12 am
Location: Russia

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by AlexCobra »

So if the hand it over at GMT-6 it would go to Bob at GMT-8 then Alex GMT+3 then me GMT, otherwise we could be waiting 2 days for us to do our turns as it would keep arriving when we have gone to bed. If we do it this way we stand the best chance of getting a turn per day

I accept this. It means that Bob have to begin the game. Or should it be me? Anyway, it's time to.

Alex.
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: multiple player PBEM - vote

Post by Nomad »

For the Allies, send your turns to Gary at EDT and he will send to me at MDT and I will send to Scott also at MDT. He can send it to Bob when he is done.
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents wanted”