Military Intel not so intelligent

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
usersatch
Posts: 400
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 6:39 pm

Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by usersatch »

Clearing the Gilberts right now. Took out Apamama and Tarawa with no prob. Had daily recon flights over Makin for the past two weeks. Intel told me roughly 2500 troops stationed there. Took 25th ID and landed. I didnt bring anything else, thinking 15,000 troops will waste 2500 troops no sweat like before. I land and get hammered by 9500 troops!!! Fortunately, I had engineers and the 40th ID on Tarawa, so I brought them over in the next couple of turns, but it ended up taking me about 10 days to clear Makin. 2500 troops my arse!

Anyone else had problems with faulty intel? I guess that is the "realism" molded into the game?
User avatar
joey
Posts: 1532
Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Johnstown, PA

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by joey »

Yes it is common. I guess it is called camoflage. It is a good practice send much more than you think you need and have more in reserve if you need them.
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Gem35 »

plus, the Japs were notoriously good at "hiding" from the enemy in underground bunkers and tunnels and such. FOW is in effect for your game , I presume?
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
Jaws_slith
Posts: 618
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 10:00 am

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Jaws_slith »

Just like I want to see it.[;)]

If you always know what the enemy does... War would be easy. Look at history and see how many times battles opponents were misjudged.

Not only by camouflage but also by misleading. One of the nicest misleads was the straw trick from the Germans with the preparations of the Ardennes offensive. By covering the roads with straw by night they were able to prevent tank and vehicle tracks on the roads. The Allies had maximum air and intel superiority but still the attack came as a surprise.
Good Hunting
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Nikademus »

Keep in mind too, non dedicated recon planes will not do nearly as well as recon planes when assigning them to the recon mission.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Precisely! I learned that the hard way, when I mistakenly thought that PBY's could give me good photo intel, and then nearly lost an RCT landing somewhere that shouldn't have been very heavily defended. Overtime for the bombardment line and nearby bomber groups!
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Gem35 »

1.) Recon flights can raise the DL(detection level) of a ground unit by 4 based on chance( percentage chance of pilots experience).

2.) A patrol or bomber recon flight can raise it by 2 by chance( percentage chance equal to pilot experience divided by 2)

3.) Bombing a ground unit will also give a DL increase of 1 using same formula as point #2

this info was taken from the manual on page 170 section 10.1.3
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by wild_Willie2 »

Keep in mind too, non dedicated recon planes will not do nearly as well as recon planes when assigning them to the recon mission.

In my allied scen 13 game we are at 12-12-42 and I have the mighty total of 1 recon group....
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
User avatar
fre0n
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:29 am

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by fre0n »

ORIGINAL: usersatch

Anyone else had problems with faulty intel? I guess that is the "realism" molded into the game?

Iwo Jima ? [:D]

http://history.acusd.edu/gen/WW2Timeline/LUTZ/iwo.html

We can see, at the end of the page, in the 'FINAL ANALYSIS OF THE BATTLE'
The U.S. had underestimated the Japanese strenght on the island by as much as 70 percent.
"A good plan executed today is better than a perfect plan executed at some indefinite point in the future."

- General George Patton Jr
User avatar
Sharkosaurus rex
Posts: 467
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am
Location: under the waves
Contact:

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Sharkosaurus rex »

You need to use Fiji Film. Always good results.

But have to be careful because the recon plane units seem to pick out only one or two pilots to go on these missions. The must be danger junkies. And might crash with high fatigue. I normally base two Jap recon units in the same base and change them over ech turn.
Is Sharkosaurus rex the biggest fish in the sea?
Why don't you come in for a swim?
User avatar
Tom Hunter
Posts: 2194
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:57 am

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Tom Hunter »

It also helps to send in a speculative bombardment mission or two just to see what turns up.

I have been flying recon over Lunga for a week or two and getting a report of 14,000 troops. When I hit the place with some cruisers there was a report of 2,400 casualties!

This gave me a lot of information:

1) The casuality report is crocked
2) There are more than 14,000 guys at Lunga
3) There are no planes there, I did not see any destroyed
4) Bombardment does work better if you have good recon

I still don't know how much damage my ships really did but I learned quite a bit and did not sacrifice a USMC Division in the process.
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Nikademus »

Recon improves bombardments by 50%
User avatar
Oznoyng
Posts: 818
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 10:05 pm
Location: Mars

RE: Military Intel not so intelligent

Post by Oznoyng »

The best recon when it comes to LCU strength is a series of massive ground attack air missions. If you hit the same LCU three turns in a row, that's all that is at the base, or no other unit at the base is more powerful than the unit hit (after being hit by hundreds of bombs for three turns).
"There is no Black or White, only shades of Grey."
"If you aren't a part of the solution, you're a part of the problem."
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”