can dive bomber ground attack be seperated from infrastructure bombing in an upgrade

Gary Grigsby's World At War gives you the chance to really run a world war. History is yours to write and things may turn out differently. The Western Allies may be conquered by Germany, or Japan may defeat China. With you at the controls, leading the fates of nations and alliances. Take command in this dynamic turn-based game and test strategies that long-past generals and world leaders could only dream of. Now anything is possible in this new strategic offering from Matrix Games and 2 by 3 Games.

Moderators: Joel Billings, JanSorensen

Post Reply
Fallshirmjager
Posts: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:13 am

can dive bomber ground attack be seperated from infrastructure bombing in an upgrade

Post by Fallshirmjager »

im wondering if the infrastructure bombing could be seperated from the groundattack for dive bombers and maybe heavy bombers. if itcould be a seperate researchable attribute. my point being that its pretty hard for a stuka to bomb a tank unless it has like a 9 or 10 attack which seems kinda unobtainable due to the fact that tank-busting stukas Ju 87Gs on the eastern front gave the soviets some pretty heavy tank losses at the battle of kursk and the remainder of the war. german pilot major hans-ulrich rudel was credited with destroying 500 soviet tanks during the war flying a stuka. what im suggesting is that the ground attack for stukas be upped to at least 7 for spring 1940 and keep the infrastructure it'd have to be a different attack kept the same or lowered to compenate. same goes for the allied dive bombers also. for the operations in france allied planes were equipped with heavy tank busting cannons to kock the tigers out because the top armor was the thinnest i think 100 mm only. anyways it seems the infrastructure bombing employed by the stukas on london is a little different than the tank bustung methods.
Post Reply

Return to “Gary Grigsby's World at War”