Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.
Post Reply
User avatar
Hartley
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:21 pm

Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Hartley »

Are there any disadvantages involved ?
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by DuckofTindalos »

Aside from the fact that the B-24's require a bigger base, no...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
pompack
Posts: 2585
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 1:44 am
Location: University Park, Texas

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by pompack »

ORIGINAL: Hartley

Are there any disadvantages involved ?

airfield size, but flying B24s from a size 4 airfield gives you more range and payload than B26s. The difference is thatthe damage rate for the B24 would be higher than the B26 in that case. Of course, IRL the maintenance requirements for a B24 were MUCH higher than for a B26.
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7204
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Feinder »

Well, the first kick is that your B-26s can opperate from AF(3) and A(4). The B-24s operation from AF(5) and AF(6). So your deployment options with the B-26 are more. That's going to spread out your squadrons a little bit more, and made you less vulnerable than if you have a few "packed" airfields.

Flying B-26s require fewer supplies than B-24s.

It also depends on the losses that your B-24s sustain. If you upgrade too many sqdns, you'll never have enough B-24s in your pool to keep your active sqdns fleshed out once they're in combat.

But, if you've got the supplies, the airfield space, and the replacements, B-24s are a wonder thing.

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
Martti
Posts: 237
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:20 pm

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Martti »

ORIGINAL: Feinder

Well, the first kick is that your B-26s can opperate from AF(3) and A(4). The B-24s operation from AF(5) and AF(6).

B-24's can operate from level 4 airfield with reduced load and from level 5 with full load. All aircraft except B-29 (AF(7) for full load) can fly normally from airfield level 5 or higher. C-46 might be an exception, but I am not sure about transport plane airfield requirements.
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Halsey »

This is why when playing with the user defined paths that all US medium bomber groups will be upgraded to B-24's.[:D]
Big B
Posts: 4642
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: Halsey

This is why when playing with the user defined paths that all US medium bomber groups will be upgraded to B-24's.[:D]
That's pretty much what 8th Air Force did with their "user defined paths and upgrades"![:D]

B
Halsey
Posts: 4688
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:44 pm

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Halsey »

ORIGINAL: Big B

ORIGINAL: Halsey

This is why when playing with the user defined paths that all US medium bomber groups will be upgraded to B-24's.[:D]
That's pretty much what 8th Air Force did with their "user defined paths and upgrades"![:D]

Yup!!![:D]
User avatar
ADavidB
Posts: 2464
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by ADavidB »

ORIGINAL: Hartley

Are there any disadvantages involved ?

Early in the war you won't have tons of B-24s, so you are better off using B-26s (or other tactical bombers) than nothing (or B-18s which are worse than nothing).

And until you get good, long range escorts you will take heavy, costly losses of B-24s. 48 B-26s with P-40Bs or Es are much better against ships with fighter escort than 48 B-24s at long range with no escort (assuming that they fly).

A balance of forces is always the best...

Good luck -

Dave Baranyi
User avatar
eMonticello
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 7:35 am

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by eMonticello »

Yes, your electron pilots will resent you, since you're asking them to train to fly the heavy buffs in the warzone. Also, you're messing around with the nice little org chart that an E-Ring cog produced for the Secretary of War. Finally, you've screwed the ordinance guys at SF since they now need to scrape together enough replacement parts to support your foolish decision. Are you looking forward to SPAM Turkey for Thanksgiving and Christmas, General? :)

Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example. -- Pudd'nhead Wilson
User avatar
Tom Hunter
Posts: 2194
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:57 am

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Tom Hunter »

I believe you will hit ships more often with the B26s. That is purely belief, I have no data to back it up.
User avatar
tsimmonds
Posts: 5490
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 2:01 pm
Location: astride Mason and Dixon's Line

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by tsimmonds »

ORIGINAL: Halsey

This is why when playing with the user defined paths that all US medium bomber groups will be upgraded to B-24's.[:D]
This is why I refuse to play with the user defined paths.[:D]
I believe you will hit ships more often with the B26s

I don't believe it's ships they are thinking of using them against. Just call it a hunch.
Fear the kitten!
User avatar
Hartley
Posts: 255
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 4:21 pm

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Hartley »

I use B-17s and B-24s on alternating turns to hit Rabaul and such.

And there seem to be 125 B-24s entering the theater every month. [X(]


GaryChildress
Posts: 6933
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by GaryChildress »

ORIGINAL: Tom Hunter

I believe you will hit ships more often with the B26s. That is purely belief, I have no data to back it up.

You may be right about that. I do know that B-25s seem to do well against enemy shipping, transports at least. I had some at PM in a game against AI and scored a lot of hits. However they didn't do very well against enemy warships, CAs, DDs etc.
User avatar
Gem35
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Gem35 »

I heard that bombers that drop bombs do well against shipping if their bombs they dropped hit the ship the bomber was trying to bomb.[8D]
It doesn't make any sense, Admiral. Were we better than the Japanese or just luckier?

[center]Image[/center]
[center]Banner By Feurer Krieg[/center]
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7204
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Upgrading B-26s to B-24s

Post by Feinder »

I heard that bombers that drop bombs do well against shipping if their bombs they dropped hit the ship the bomber was trying to bomb


How much wood could wood-chuck chuck, if a wood-chuck could chuck wood?

[;)]

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”