Defining "Elite"

SPWaW is a tactical squad-level World War II game on single platoon or up to an entire battalion through Europe and the Pacific (1939 to 1945).

Moderator: MOD_SPWaW

User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

Defining "Elite"

Post by KG Erwin »

"Lately, I've been considering what makes military units effective over the long haul. There are a handful of divisions that are counted as, 'elite.' Among them are the 82nd Airborne, the Big Red One, and the 101st Airborne. Of course, special operations units are elite. No one would argue that point.

There is a very short list of military forces – as opposed to units – that are counted as elite. These include the French Foreign Legion and the Royal Marines. At the very top of this list is the United States Marine Corps. In terms of size and combat power, the Corps dwarfs many of the world's armies. Size alone doesn't equate to combat effectiveness. Neither does technology, seductive though it may be. So, what does?

The Marine Corps has a powerful ethos. 'Every Marine a rifleman,' is more than empty words. No matter what job he or she does, every Marine is trained to perform basic combat skills. From the moment recruits step on the yellow footprints, they begin an indoctrination into the traditions and heritage that stretch back to the dawn of America's history.

As a combat force, the Corps has developed a fighting reputation second to none. Every one of the Marine divisions can be classed as elite. No Marine division has ever lost a battle, nor failed to achieve its objectives. From the sands of Iwo Jima to the deserts of Kuwait and Iraq, when Marines are given a mission, they get the job done.

As the world has changed, so has the Marine Corps. Although it cherishes and maintains its traditions, it has evolved to maintain relevancy in the modern world. As an expeditionary force, the Marine Corps can draw of many years of campaigning to shape its future. The Corps doesn't need to search for a mission."

-- Mark "Devil Doc" Flowers, 16 October 2005
http://www.ww2gyrene.org/

Thanks for those thoughts, "Devil Doc". I agree with you 100%. [&o]



Image
User avatar
SuomiKp
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:15 pm
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by SuomiKp »

The Marine Corps has always got the job done because they have never met the Finns [X(] on the battlefield [:D]
User avatar
VikingNo2
Posts: 2872
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: NC
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by VikingNo2 »

Okay would you like to play a Finn vs USMC battle ?


[:D][:D][8D]
User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by KG Erwin »

Viking, you're always trolling for new victims, aren't you? However, I'd like for SuomiKp to prove his assertion, too. [;)]
Image
User avatar
VikingNo2
Posts: 2872
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: NC
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by VikingNo2 »

Opponents and as you know, thats was a Marines can't stand up to the Finns statement and who knows it may be true[X(]
PimpYourAFV
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 11:49 pm
Location: Japan

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by PimpYourAFV »


Erwin why don't you fight Viking and post an AAR about it? One can be the USMC and the other either Japan or Germany preferrably with the latter defending against an assault. That would be a good fight to see. [:'(]
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Terminus »

Actually, I'd like to see a USMC vs Fins fight. Sometime after 1943, with heavy Marine firepower against Finnish Jaegers...
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by KG Erwin »

I see that 1944 Finn Infantry squads have satchel charges and Molotovs, and the Engineers have something called a Flamegun. How did they get all this stuff? The answer, of course, is that they were so small in numbers. Let's go back 5 years. Despite their courage, a large army with massive artillery (AKA the Russians) smashed the Mannerheim Line in 1939 and forced the territorial concessions that drove the Finns into the arms of the Germans.
Image
User avatar
Puukkoo
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Seinäjoki, Finland

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Puukkoo »

They did not crush Mannerheim line in 1939. It happened in 1940, but still didn't take Viipuri.
Don't be shocked, I AM funny.
User avatar
omegaall
Posts: 317
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 4:37 pm

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by omegaall »

Gunny.. interesting comments from you.
BUT what is elite??

You make reference to some units but still have not made any real statemet on how to determine elite.

You may see the US Marine Corps as elite others may not.

I may see the Royal Marines as elite and No 1 vs you list. Here is a good example of different concepts of elite.

Also just winning every battle/conflict/getting the job done does not constitute elite. Like you said size of the unit/corps and its technology does not also make it elite either.


User avatar
Puukkoo
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Seinäjoki, Finland

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Puukkoo »

And do not forget Finns Blitz Squads:

Suomi M/31 SMG (acc 2, kill 4)
7.62 DP LMG
7.62 DP LMG
Satchel Charge
Don't be shocked, I AM funny.
User avatar
SuomiKp
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:15 pm
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by SuomiKp »

ORIGINAL: Puukkoo

They did not crush Mannerheim line in 1939. It happened in 1940, but still didn't take Viipuri.

Didint they take Viipuri with pen and paper ?
User avatar
Puukkoo
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:14 am
Location: Seinäjoki, Finland

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Puukkoo »

ORIGINAL: SuomiKp

Didint they take Viipuri with pen and paper ?

And president Kallio said "May such a hand rot that undersigns such an agreement"
Don't be shocked, I AM funny.
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Terminus »

Personally, I think the USMC have gotten too big to be elite (sorry, Gunny).
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
SuomiKp
Posts: 40
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:15 pm
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by SuomiKp »

ORIGINAL: VikingNo2

Okay would you like to play a Finn vs USMC battle ?


[:D][:D][8D]

I dont play Spwaw anymore , just making some noice [:)]
I have played Winspmbt 2.0 against AI now and then
User avatar
VikingNo2
Posts: 2872
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2002 10:00 am
Location: NC
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by VikingNo2 »

I think it would be a good battle I see if I can get someone else to play it[:D]

I'm having a heck of a time leaning how to use arty properly in SPMBT [:(]
User avatar
Alby
Posts: 4659
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Alby »

ORIGINAL: VikingNo2

I think it would be a good battle I see if I can get someone else to play it[:D]

I'm having a heck of a time leaning how to use arty properly in SPMBT [:(]


I will try it...depot multi mod 2??
LOL [:D]



User avatar
KG Erwin
Posts: 8366
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Cross Lanes WV USA

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by KG Erwin »

ORIGINAL: omegaall

Gunny.. interesting comments from you.
BUT what is elite??

You make reference to some units but still have not made any real statemet on how to determine elite.

You may see the US Marine Corps as elite others may not.

I may see the Royal Marines as elite and No 1 vs you list. Here is a good example of different concepts of elite.

Also just winning every battle/conflict/getting the job done does not constitute elite. Like you said size of the unit/corps and its technology does not also make it elite either.



Actually, the comments were not mine, if you revisit the first posting. I just happen to agree with what "Doc" said. Of course, Mark was both a Navy Corpsman serving with a Marine unit and later joined the Army (he was in Gulf War I), so there's a little "professional pride" in his commentary, too. [;)] He is a good friend of mine, and I respect his opinions.

In SPWaW, the Marines are rated as "average" infantry, at least in 1941-42. For game purposes, the "elite" status is given to units like the 1942-43 Raiders. I always felt that earlier versions rated the USMC too high. These were changes that I proposed for the 8.3 OOB update, and they were accepted.

I don't have a personal definition of what "elite" really means. It's a subjective thing, and an exercise in rhetoric. Merriam-Webster defines "elite" as "the choice part, also a superior group"--that's a rhetorical statement in of itself.

Now, "esprit" is something else, and there's no doubt that the Corps has ALWAYS had that. However, it is also an indefinable trait that defies being measured objectively.

So, that's my best attempt at being a politician, and I'll firmly stick by my vagueness. [:D]
Image
User avatar
Alby
Posts: 4659
Joined: Sat Apr 29, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Greenwood, Indiana
Contact:

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Alby »

This is "Elite"
[:D][:D][:D]
[:D][:D][:D]

Image
Attachments
Alby3.jpg
Alby3.jpg (77.51 KiB) Viewed 525 times

User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Defining "Elite"

Post by Terminus »

So's this:



Image
Attachments
elite.jpg
elite.jpg (29.88 KiB) Viewed 524 times
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Post Reply

Return to “Steel Panthers World At War & Mega Campaigns”