PzB vs Wobbly - Clash of Steel

Post descriptions of your brilliant successes and unfortunate demises.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

Yesterday the crews of several Betty naval bombers were asked to voluenteer for
a risky mission: to bomb the major ports of Tarawa, Lunga, Port Moresby and Darwin.
Only a small number would go without escorts and attempt to identify and perhaps hit an
enemy capital ship in port.

Only the mission against Lunga was cancelled due to bad weather:
The raid against Tarawa met no opposition and didn't find any capital ships in port.
At Port Moresby 2 bombers were lost but hit a transport with a 800kg bomb. No capital ships identified here either.
At Derby the raiders were mauled by 12 Spits, 7 ac were lost and only 2 returned. Very few ships in this port.

It was a bit unfortunate that the raid against Lunga was cancelled, I had hoped to identify
a carrier and perhaps hit a major unit in the port.

The recon that was gathered from these missions indicate that the enemy is not very
active in either the Gilberts nor in Northern Australia. This supports the evidence that
Bougainville really is Kens next objective. I thought he may try to divert my attention
with all these Marine Raider landings.

Several Dinah III recon squadrons have been ordered to resume long range recon
missions against various key installations in the Solomons.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/30/43

Air Combat

Day Air attack on Tarawa , at 85,91 - veery quiet in the Gilberts...

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 8

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 8 damaged

Aircraft Attacking:
6 x G4M1 Betty bombing at 8000 feet
2 x G4M1 Betty bombing at 8000 feet
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Port Moresby , at 53,91 - the 'usual activity' here

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 5

Allied aircraft
F4F-4 Wildcat x 6
F4U-1 Corsair x 9

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied Ships
AK Algorab, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage (hit by 800kg bomb)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Darwin , at 36,84 - a few ships and a sub in the harbour..and very vicious Spits in the skies [:'(]

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 8

Allied aircraft
Spitfire Vb x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 7 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire Vb: 2 damaged
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on TF, near Lautem at 33,78 - the bombers evade the CAP. Bingo Maru was not a lucky name!

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 6
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 7

Allied aircraft
Beaufighter Mk 21 x 7
B-17E Fortress x 8

No Japanese losses

No Allied losses

Japanese Ships
AK Bingo Maru, Bomb hits 8, on fire, heavy damage *sinks*
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

All Marine Raider detachements were wiped out today. I will try to rotate some
of the units in the bases that were 'reconed' over the next week or so.

Ground combat at Buka

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 8339 troops, 31 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 20 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 104 to 1

Japanese ground losses:
12 casualties reported

Allied ground losses:
25 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Gasmata

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 5818 troops, 31 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 40 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 19 to 1

Japanese ground losses:
27 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Allied ground losses:
29 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Torokina

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 2165 troops, 8 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 40 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 59 to 1

Allied ground losses:
45 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Gasmata

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 5774 troops, 28 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 4)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Reinforcement Schedule

Here is the immediate air reinforcement schedule: As you can see there are two major
transport units awaiting available aircraft. I had to increase production of Topsy's to receive
this new unit - there are now 35 ac in the pool and I'm expecting it to arrive tomorrow.

The Hickory's is another annoying story. The short legged (normal range 2) ac is almost useless
but I still prefer to get the unit. So I've restarted a production run - there are still 60 available engines
in the pool. Currently there are 18 in the pool and it will take another full month before the unit arrives.

I'm still getting Nate's as you can see. How depressing...

Image
Attachments
air06.gif
air06.gif (121.74 KiB) Viewed 232 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

True Pauk, I can't sit down and let Ken occupy Bougainville. Today he said that he's trying
to figure out how his LCMs can land a full division in a single day. Guess this is how he wants
to secure the rest of the Solomons.

Going to be difficult to prevent this with dozens of PT boats and swarms of enemy ac around.

Yesterday another Akitsuki destroyer arrived at Tokyo and today it received its
first upgrade [:'(] What's the use of this? All further Akitsuki destroyers that arrive
will also require upgrades. Well, the Akitsuki class is my favourite Jap destroyer class
and with the 06/43 upgrade it becomes a truly formidable ship with air and ground search
radars, great dual purpose 3.9" guns and a formidable AA suit (274). In all 5 of these ships
were upgraded today.

Production of the GM42 Betty has started - they're more expensive to produce than the G4M1
and I'm not sure it's worth it...

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 05/31/43

Air Combat

Forgot to stand these Betties down...oops!

Day Air attack on Tarawa , at 85,91

Japanese aircraft
G4M1 Betty x 3

Allied aircraft
P-40E Warhawk x 21

Japanese aircraft losses
G4M1 Betty: 2 destroyed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Ken really takes it out and spreads his Marine Raiders all over the Solomons
and New Guinea to recon my bases...

Coastal Guns at Lae, 54,87, firing at TF 1165
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 1165 encounters mine field at Lae (54,87)

TF 1165 troops unloading over beach at Lae, 54,87

Allied ground losses:
15 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lae

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 2434 troops, 18 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 10 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/01/43

Invasions/Ground Combat

I continue securing the small dot island that are not Japanese controlled!

TF 45 troops unloading over beach at Talaud Island, 42,64

Japanese ground losses:
54 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 45 troops unloading over beach at Talaud Island, 42,64

Japanese ground losses:
53 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet another sub recon mission...

Coastal Guns at Shortlands, 63,93, firing at TF 1144
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 1144 encounters mine field at Shortlands (63,93)

TF 1144 troops unloading over beach at Shortlands, 63,93
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Lae

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 6433 troops, 37 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 10 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 57 to 1

Allied ground losses:
5 casualties reported

Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Shortlands

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 5656 troops, 11 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 30 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The KB - Mid 1943

The entire KB is now at Truk - 9 cv's and 4 cvl's. The Akagi has reached Shanghai and in 2 days
3 points of system damage has been repaired. Now at 77. All 4 escort carriers (cve) are at Balikpapan.

As you can see the KB holds 800 ac even without the Akagi and the escort carriers. In 2 weeks another
2 light carriers with 60 will join the fleet.

I don't expect Ken to use his carriers offensively (at least not outside his own LBA range) for a while, so I'm
thinking about sortying the KB soon! The operation will be called 'Summer Harvest'.

A replenishment TF has been sent towards Japan were it will load fuel and head back into the great open expanse of
water north east of Marcus Island.

In 3 weeks time the KB will sail from Truk and replenish at Marcus islands (tankers will unload 60k units of fuel here)
and catch up with the replenishment tankers.

At the same time 3-4 search plane equipped subs will take up position outside the US ports and when suitable targets
have been spotted the KB will surge in and sink as many ships as possible. I'm planning to use 10-12 fast carriers that can be
divided into 4 divisions and cover a large expanse of water when fanning out. the plan is to fan out at top speed for 2-3 days
before reversing direction and reforming the KB.

Of course it will be important to stand down all search planes to avoid enemy contact before the trap is sprung.
Most preferably it will be possible to execute this operation at the same time as Ken is busy carrying out some minor invasion in the
Solomons or New Guinea. This should require the support from some of his carriers.

Image
Attachments
KB43.gif
KB43.gif (96.16 KiB) Viewed 232 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
brisd
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: San Diego, CA

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by brisd »

That TF is indeed impressive and that plan holds promise. I do think the Solomans could be defended with your current forces, bloody him well, possibly score big VP's (see below). Good luck!

The next seven months or so is that last opportunity that Japan has to have tactical superiority over the Allies. I recommend high VP targets, is it still possible to score an autovictory at end of 43? I agree an active defence, an agressive defense, limited offense is best way to use your forces. Once 44 arrives, US shipboard AA and new US carriers, BB's, etc., plus hordes of new fighters and bombers will overwelm you. Personally, I'd never want to reach '44. I will always play to end the war in 42 or 43, as Japan's leaders hoped. A long war is a losing proposition. I do enjoy playing hopeless positions vs a computer opponent, for challenge sake, but not against a human! [8D]
"I propose to fight it out on this line if it takes all summer."-Note sent with Congressman Washburne from Spotsylvania, May 11, 1864, to General Halleck. - General Ulysses S. Grant
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

If I was going for an auto victory I should retreat as many of my forces out of Ken's range
as possible BrisD! He still have to make good 3000 points or so over the next 7 months.

All Allied targets that are worth anything are now heavily defended and it will cost me dearly to
contest them. Even if I fight a 'Guadalcanal' type battle for Bougainville losses will at best be on
a 1-1 ratio. This will only benefit Ken....

So instead we should try to force him to undertake more risky offensives in 3 or 4 months - then
we could provide him with a really good spanking [8D] If Operation 'Summer Harvest' turns out as I
hope it will disrupt Allied shipping, throw of Ken's timeline and make him even more desperate to avoid
an autovictory. The shipping lanes must be full of loaded transports at this time of the war!-)

The only realistic way Japan had of winning the war would be to demoralize the US and their will to fight.
I think we have achieved that already, but a tru Bushido warrior doesn't covet peace!-) A a little piece of
Poland and a little piece of Greece is much better! [;)]

I'm actually looking forward to 1944, but to make it an interesting journey we can't squander our forces in
meaningless battles. They should be preserved for the decisive show downs that are bound to come.

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/02/43

Ground Combat

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Shortlands - this was the last of the lot

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 4516 troops, 10 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 10 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 22 to 1

Allied ground losses:
5 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Talaud Island - only two more to go

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 618 troops, 2 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 0)

Japanese forces CAPTURE Talaud Island base !!!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
brisd
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: San Diego, CA

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by brisd »

ORIGINAL: PzB

I'm actually looking forward to 1944, but to make it an interesting journey we can't squander our forces in
meaningless battles. They should be preserved for the decisive show downs that are bound to come.

You are a masochist [:D]. But I understand your strategy, those transports are worthy targets and even threating them will slow down any allied advance, spread out his forces.
"I propose to fight it out on this line if it takes all summer."-Note sent with Congressman Washburne from Spotsylvania, May 11, 1864, to General Halleck. - General Ulysses S. Grant
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

You may be right BrisD - but I'm going to need a lot of support from you guys when the going
gets really tough [8|]

If I can make Ken really paranoid about his shipping lanes it could be possible to disrupt his plans.
Perhaps I can not only send out a single raid but repeat it and then change hunting grounds?

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/03/43

Air Attack

I ordered some of my night fighters to strike the airfields at Mili. They
performed well and actually destroyed a Corsair on the ground. Another
night fighter unit is being trained in China and got an average skill rate of
70 now. I'm hoping that this highly experienced group will become more
efficient both at night interceptions and attacks.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Night Air attack on Mili , at 84,85

Japanese aircraft
Ki-45 KAIa Nick x 30

Allied aircraft
no flights

Japanese aircraft losses
Ki-45 KAIa Nick: 11 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
F4U-1 Corsair: 1 destroyed

Runway hits 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Arawe is a small 0 size base just west of Gasmata. Why does Ken want to
land a small party here? I was tempted to ignore it but came to think about
Russian bridgehead..if left alone for 5 min they would grow to really ugly sprouts [:'(]
So I'm going to eject the invaders....

TF 1163 troops unloading over beach at Arawe, 57,89

Allied ground losses:
10 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Situation Map: Enemy spotted

Ken says that there won't be too many quiet days from now on! From what I can see an invasion
of Bougainville or Lae/Gasmata are the most likely options - but it's also possible that Ken is more
sneaky. A Glen equipped sub spotted an enemy TF heading northeast from Perth today. (see picture
and intel report) Are these ships part of a larger force heading for Java or Timor?

The sub has been ordered to shadow the TF and I've dispatched an AV with 6 Jack's to keep a watch
on the area.

Another TF has been spotted east of the Marshalls. It's possible that this convoy is heading for Johnston
Island but another sub will shadow it.

Image
Attachments
subspot.gif
subspot.gif (299.63 KiB) Viewed 232 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

No sign of the TF's I spotted earlier...bad weather may have grounded my search
planes though.

Asked Ken whether he is going to land a raider platoon from his subs on all of my bases.
I usually land advanced recon squads on target bases immediately prior to an invasion.
Don't want to tell Ken what he can do or not, but personally I don't wish to see these raids
on a large scale - on either side. Something about too much and too little again.

What do the rest of you think?

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/04/43

Ground Combat

Several more subs unload small ground units in the Solomons and
on NG. The USS Narwhal hit a mine - liked that. The paras sent in to
Arawe quickly took out the raiders. Have to airlift another company to
Finschafen [8|]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coastal Guns at Rabaul, 61,88, firing at TF 1078
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 1078 encounters mine field at Rabaul (61,88)

TF 1078 troops unloading over beach at Rabaul, 61,88

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 1111 encounters mine field at Green Island (63,89)

TF 1111 troops unloading over beach at Green Island, 63,89

Allied Ships
SS Narwhal, Mine hits 1

Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported

Coastal Guns at Green Island, 63,89, firing at TF 1111
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TF 1167 troops unloading over beach at Finschafen, 55,87
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Rabaul

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 11673 troops, 149 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 20 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Green Island

Japanese Bombardment attack

Attacking force 1624 troops, 12 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 30 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied ground losses:
19 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Green Island

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 9863 troops, 30 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 4)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Arawe

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 20 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 422 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 0)

Allied ground losses:
13 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Honda
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 5:15 pm
Location: Karlovac, Croatia

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by Honda »

I never do sub recon I expect the same from my oppnents. It's just stupid. You got recon planes - use them. The more you recon a base more info you get. And that's how the game is suppose to be played. If the base is out of your recon ac range then you'll just have harder time scouting it 'cause you'll have to use long-range search planes (most likely).
kkoovvoo
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 1:49 pm
Location: Slovakia
Contact:

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by kkoovvoo »

No way that 20 men landed at enemy base will recognize the composition of forces there IRL. It is gamey and i never do it.

1/ he has scout planes to learn total numbers of your troops,
2/ he can use ground attack from his bases to learn which troops are exactly in your base,
3/ he has signal intelligence.

Thats enough i think.
User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: kkoovvoo

No way that 20 men landed at enemy base will recognize the composition of forces there IRL. It is gamey and i never do it.

1/ he has scout planes to learn total numbers of your troops,
2/ he can use ground attack from his bases to learn which troops are exactly in your base,
3/ he has signal intelligence.

Thats enough i think.

not if they are lead by LT. J. Wayne [:D]
Surface combat TF fanboy
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by Andy Mac »

And yet sub launched commando's were a primary way of obtaining intel it happened in every theatre.

Again it is an example of players using something that was used in the real war to an ahistoric extent.

Personally as long as it doesnt force surrenders then I have no problem with it. I will respect the attitude of my opponents on this issue but there are enough other features in the game that are over used compared to real war (BB Bombardments by the IJN, concentrated heavies by the allies etc etc) that I think its a tad unfair to restrict this feature.

(In my game against String I used 1 RCT as my raiding formation and because we had banned subs I used FT DD's to achieve the same end ..... plus annoy him [:D][:D])

User avatar
String
Posts: 2661
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2003 7:56 pm
Location: Estonia

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by String »

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

And yet sub launched commando's were a primary way of obtaining intel it happened in every theatre.

Again it is an example of players using something that was used in the real war to an ahistoric extent.

Personally as long as it doesnt force surrenders then I have no problem with it. I will respect the attitude of my opponents on this issue but there are enough other features in the game that are over used compared to real war (BB Bombardments by the IJN, concentrated heavies by the allies etc etc) that I think its a tad unfair to restrict this feature.

(In my game against String I used 1 RCT as my raiding formation and because we had banned subs I used FT DD's to achieve the same end ..... plus annoy him [:D][:D])


Yes, they were quite annoying, but because of them I had moved sizeable forces to the same area, which resulted in your Koepang invasion bogging down. Otherwise you would have had the base by the third day and everything within range 9 would have been levelled.
Surface combat TF fanboy
Andy Mac
Posts: 12578
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Alexandria, Scotland

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by Andy Mac »

Yup I made a mistake but actually it had started to work in my favour ..... attrition is the allies friend !!!!
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

Air torrent hits Rabaul

Post by PzB74 »

Thx for the input guys! I agree with both views actually... Recon squads provide too much intel.
At the same time I've found it hard to ban them altogether. I've only used them in a very
limited way and suggested this to Ken.

Last time I sent one out was prior to the aborted landings in the Gilberts/Marshalls. I didn't
send them out until my invasion force had arrived in the area.

Today Ken launched his long promised offensive in the Solomons - well air offensive at least.
I have been expecting one for some days now and Rabaul received additional fighters less
than a week ago. As suspected there were still far too few to stop the bomber and fighter
torrents that arrived today. The results were pretty much like last time:

Several raids compromising a total of:

46 P-40N Warhawks
191 P-38 Lightnings
219 medium bombers
269 heavy bombers

Ca 160 Jap fighters defended the base.

Results: Enemy ac shot down by flak/CAP

38 P-40N Warhawks
77 P-38 Lightnings
14 medium bombers
2 heavy bombers

ca 135 Jap fighters shot down in A2A combat + another 90 ac destroyed on the ground.

I only had 2 units of Tabby transport ac in Rabaul this time and all 12 of them were
destroyed on the ground... I have dispatched cargo ships to pick the empty formations up.
Quite annoying that it isn't possible to move them out by air. Several of the fighter units
had 0 operational ac as well.

The airfields have been completely demolished (95/100 runway/service damage) and
I pondered about whether I should send in another 135 highly experienced Zeros and then
add more Tojos from the Marshalls tomorrow. I decided against it as it wouldn't be enough
to stop the bombers. Ken has promised that they will be back tomorrow. This is one of the
cases were brute force is sufficient to win the day...and there will be a lot more of them!

You can see the aircraft loss table that has been attached for more details

Air offensive/defensive operations will continue from Kavieng, Admirality islands and
other air bases that have been built just north of Rabaul. Occasionally fighters will LR CAP
Rabaul to intercept enemy bombers and fatigued escort fighters over Rabaul, but that's about it.
It will take a long time to repair the facilities their - and as long as the bombing continues......

I am now expecting Ken to invade one of the bases on Bougainville. Some of the bases there
are weakly defended - and this is no secret anymore. The fleet has been put on alert. The next
few days will be exiting. The extremely large number of enemy bombers will make operations in
the area very risky at best...

Should I use the Fleet to intercept or is Operation Summer Harvest a better option while light forces
delay the enemy for as long as possible?

AFTER ACTION REPORTS FOR 06/05/43

Air Combat

Here you can see how Rabaul was demolished! Fighter to fighter combat was fierce and
only a few of the 160 Jap fighters got through to the bomber streams. Personally I find
A2A combat between fighters is too lethal in WitP.

The Zero's performed best against the P-40N Warhawks while the Army fighters took
down most of the P-38s. That could be usefull to know...

Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 44
A6M3 Zero x 16
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 68
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 29

Allied aircraft
P-40N Warhawk x 46
P-38G Lightning x 124
B-25J Mitchell x 106

Japanese aircraft losses (these losses include ac both A2A and ground casualties)
A6M2 Zero: 27 destroyed
A6M3 Zero: 10 destroyed
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 60 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 13 destroyed, 4 damaged
L2D2 Tabby: 5 destroyed
Ki-46-III Dinah: 3 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-40N Warhawk: 36 destroyed
P-38G Lightning: 57 destroyed, 10 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 6 destroyed, 22 damaged
B-26B Marauder: 1 destroyed

Japanese ground losses:
108 casualties reported
Guns lost 2

Airbase hits 28
Airbase supply hits 5
Runway hits 132
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 10
A6M3 Zero x 5
Ki-44-IIb Tojo x 7
Ki-61 KAIc Tony x 8

Allied aircraft
P-38G Lightning x 67
B-25J Mitchell x 113
B-17E Fortress x 99
PB4Y Liberator x 12
B-24D Liberator x 35

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 16 destroyed
Ki-44-IIb Tojo: 16 destroyed
Ki-61 KAIc Tony: 19 destroyed
L2D2 Tabby: 6 destroyed
Ki-46-III Dinah: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
P-38G Lightning: 11 destroyed, 5 damaged
B-25J Mitchell: 9 damaged
B-17E Fortress: 10 damaged
PB4Y Liberator: 2 damaged
B-24D Liberator: 3 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
85 casualties reported
Guns lost 3

Airbase hits 23
Airbase supply hits 8
Runway hits 297
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 2
A6M3 Zero x 5

Allied aircraft
B-24D Liberator x 92

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 1 destroyed
Ki-46-III Dinah: 1 destroyed
L2D2 Tabby: 1 destroyed

Allied aircraft losses
B-24D Liberator: 2 destroyed, 17 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
39 casualties reported

Airbase hits 6
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 97
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Day Air attack on Rabaul , at 61,88

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 2
A6M3 Zero x 5

Allied aircraft
F-5A Lightning x 3
B-17E Fortress x 31

No Japanese losses

Allied aircraft losses
B-17E Fortress: 8 damaged

Japanese ground losses:
8 casualties reported
Guns lost 1

Airbase hits 2
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A 'special' mission was carried out against Darwin from Timor: Recon ac showed that there were
numerous enemy subs in the docks and I wanted to hit them. The Spits were lethal - as usual -
but 800kg bombs rained down on the subs and the SS-35 and SS Saury were sunk at their moorings.
The raid must therefore be considered a success - although an expensive one.

Day Air attack on Darwin , at 36,84

Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 29
G4M1 Betty x 31

Allied aircraft
Spitfire Vb x 12

Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 7 destroyed
G4M1 Betty: 7 destroyed, 17 damaged

Allied aircraft losses
Spitfire Vb: 1 destroyed, 1 damaged

Allied Ships
SS S-35, Bomb hits 2, on fire, heavy damage
SS Pompon, Bomb hits 1, on fire
AS William P. McArthur, Bomb hits 1, on fire
SS Saury, Bomb hits 1, on fire, heavy damage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground Combat

Yet another dot island invasino in the DEI...

TF 45 troops unloading over beach at Taliabu, 37,70

Japanese ground losses:
38 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Finschafen - my paras again repulsed the recon squad
from capturing a base

Allied Shock attack

Attacking force 20 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 337 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Allied assault odds: 0 to 1 (fort level 1)

Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ground combat at Arawe

Japanese Deliberate attack

Attacking force 422 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Defending force 0 troops, 0 guns, 0 vehicles

Japanese assault odds: 9 to 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Air Losses


Image
Attachments
airlosses0643.gif
airlosses0643.gif (116.97 KiB) Viewed 232 times
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
brisd
Posts: 613
Joined: Sat May 20, 2000 8:00 am
Location: San Diego, CA

RE: Air torrent hits Rabaul

Post by brisd »

Ouch - that's a lot of Ki-44's to lose in one day! I don't know if I would contest the landings in Solomons, only if you feel KB can operate outside of LBA and cover your surface tf's with LRCAP. Then I'd say go for it, sink his ships while you have the ability to do so.

As far as the Darwin raid, I'd consider that a big success. Two subs sunk, which will pay for air losses I'd guess. I'd trade a dozen planes for any sub sunk. How many ships would those subs potentially sink over the next two years??? Thanks for the details, it helps to see the challanges you face during this timeframe.
"I propose to fight it out on this line if it takes all summer."-Note sent with Congressman Washburne from Spotsylvania, May 11, 1864, to General Halleck. - General Ulysses S. Grant
User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Air torrent hits Rabaul

Post by PzB74 »

That's true BrisD - but there are 400 more of them in the pools. It will take approximately 2 months
to retrain them in China. In hindsight it could have been smarter to withdraw all ac from Rabaul - but this would
be against Jap philosophy and it is important to attempt to delay the US advance with all means available to us.

There is another problem if I try to intercept Ken's shipping in the Solomons: PT boats - dozens of them [:(]
My surface ships will be diverted, damaged and then finished by enemy LBA. The KB is so powerful that it is
possible to destroy an Allied invasion force - but losses in aircrew will be heavy as there are many Corsairs
around now. And what do I do if Ken only use LCM's to ferry in troops [&:] Very very difficult decisions...

Ideally I have to manouver Ken into a - for me - more beneficial strategic situation. Long range amphibious landings.
Then it would be much more ideal to engage Ken in a decisive battle.

I think Ken is using Darwin as a repair port for damaged subs, there are reported to be many more of
them in port. Not sure I can risk another raid, at least not until I know whether Ken has reinforced his CAP or not.
The Allied subs have not been overly efficient thus far in the war, but I expect their performance to improve when
new detonators for the MK14 torpedoes come into service next month.
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: Air torrent hits Rabaul

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

Long time reader .. don't post very often [:)]

The lightning losses are great imo. thats almost a months production lost in one day. should slow down any more unit upgrades.

Trying to stop any bouganville invasion might be too costly. save the KB for a longer range invasion. if you decide not to contest bouganville run the KB over to sulawesi just in case there is a backdoor invasion of timor coming.

How are the a/c in timor ?

great AAR by the way ..i almost spend more time reading the website than playing the game. [:D]
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by pauk »

ORIGINAL: PzB

You may be right BrisD - but I'm going to need a lot of support from you guys when the going
gets really tough [8|]

No need to worry about that, we in Croatia already have "Black Adder PzB" fanboy club. IIRC, you played only first two weeks against AI and right after that jumped in PBEM boots. This makes you a trully hero of this game....

well, i'm pretty paranoid person and when i saw your glen report i thought: this is invasion fleet to the SRA!... if I were allied player i would strike on different locations.... but my main goal would be SRA, we all know why. I do not follow Nomad's AAR (won't be fair to give you bad advices [:D] based on "additional" knowledge, so don't know if he/how much have CV's).... When i wrote about "active but not at all costs defence" in Guadalcanal i did not mentioned that SRA is" must be defended area at any cost". So, faced with 2 bad things (losing Guadalcanal area and invasion on SRA) i would choose the first - it will give you a couple of months.

SRA have two weak points (IMHO)

1) approach from northen NG (lots of bases that they can be expanded)
2) approach from Koepang and all those small islands north of Timor

#1 delaying allied offensive through NG - key is holding of Rabaul. I know that it will be impossible keep operational AF there, but as long you poses this base allied must keep formidable air and naval force in this theatre.

#2.... Koepang is starting position for "frog jumps" which will ended in Java. Is it clever to keep Koepang at all costs? is it better to fortify at Bali or one of southern little bases? I do not know... maybe it is a key to not expand this bases but expand them to fort level 9 and send forces there if you spot allied invasion towards these bases (IIRC you delay allied advance in that way in your UV game?).....


Image
Arstavidios
Posts: 782
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2004 2:02 pm

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by Arstavidios »

Well, now that Rabaul is closed as an airfield, it is likely to remain this way. [:(]
LRCAP is unlikely to protect the base long eough to alow your engineers to repair the field. Unless you have masses of engineers based there. And the alied bombers can come back again and again which would draw your trained figther pilots into the sinkhole.

User avatar
PzB74
Posts: 5069
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2000 8:00 am
Location: No(r)way

RE: Sho I-VI

Post by PzB74 »

Good to hear from you Rob!
I mostly read AARs myself before I started playing this game.

True, P-38 losses were heavy, but I'm afraid Ken got lots and lots of P-38's in his pools.

A simple calculation: 80 P-38's pr month from 10/42 and until 05/43 = 80x8 = 640.
The aircraft losses screen shows that the Allies have lost 388 P-38s so far.
640
-388
--------
= 252
--------

So I'm afraid he still got all the ac he need plus more than a thousand pilots in his AAF pool.
In September he start receiving the 'J' model of the P-38 at the rate of 75 ac pr month.
Starting in July he will get 144 Hellcats pr month...( Let's rejoice over all the British ac he doesn't
receive instead [:'(]

I will try to defend Bogainville with as many troops as can be spared - they're pretty hard to kill.
The navy will pose a threat and perhaps strike if the opportunity arises.

Arstavidios: I want to force Ken to use his Lightnings to escort his bombers to Rabaul for two reasons:
1. They will be tied down
2. Suffer heavy fatigue and become easy targets

It will be possible to controll my own ac losses, so I think it should be worth it.
There are lots of engineers on Rabaul including a full engineer regiment - but it took ca 10 days to fix
the runways and facilities after the last major attacks. The runways themselves can be clear in as few as
4-5 days though.

Thanx Pauk, appreciate it [:D]
I'm not much of a hero, it was the conquest of India that bought me 'immortality' [;)]
Being stubborn and lucky got its advantages....

I think you may be right: Ken could have launched his operations in the Solomons as a diversion.
There are two things that counts against this:
1. Very little activity around the major ports in Northern Australia.
2. It would have been beneficial to bomb the bases on Timor before an invasion. It also seems like most of the Allied
heavy bombers are in the Solomon and New Guinea theatres now.

However I will double our scouting efforts in the SRA!

An approach from Northern Guinea will be time consuming, he would have to crawl all the way from Buna to get there!-)
Koepang is a much more likely target as it holds a size 4 af.

Here are the good news: I have reinforced Timor and forts are growing in all 3 bases there. Koepang holds an aviation
regiment and there are more than 100 fighters on the island now. Another 150 fighters are at Kendari. A powerful fleet
is stationed at Balikpapan and the KB can reach the area from Truk in a few days. No less than 2 crack army divisions are
also available for a rapid counter stroke.
Image

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without"
- Dwight D. Eisenhower
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”