Unit Depictions on Screen

World in Flames is the computer version of Australian Design Group classic board game. World In Flames is a highly detailed game covering the both Europe and Pacific Theaters of Operations during World War II. If you want grand strategy this game is for you.

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets

pak19652002
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:40 am
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by pak19652002 »

That's great. Speaking of kids, my three year old loves your avatar...He ran up behind me shouting "Plankton! Plankton!".

For one precious second I thought he was a botanical genius. Then, I realized and, well, there go my dreams....
Alexander Seil
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:04 am

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Alexander Seil »

What if we can see a 29, a 70 and a 2 and phi simultaneously in A? Is that a symptom of omniscience? [:D]

I could also see that 5 in C after trying very hard.
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

You know I have been taking those tests at the eye doctor's for years and they never would tell me how well I did. Just a mumbled ugh from a nurse/technician. I am #1 by the way and you could have told me there was a picture of Marilyn Monroe in the 3rd for all that I can see there.

So, different colors for different folks. I'll ponder what the easiest way to do that is for a while.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
pak19652002
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:40 am
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by pak19652002 »

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

I am #1 by the way and you could have told me there was a picture of Marilyn Monroe in the 3rd for all that I can see there.

We are all relieved that Steve is normal. Otherwise, it would be a case of the blind leading the blind (sorry, couldn't resist).

Who told you about Marilyn Monroe? Number 3 is a little inside joke we play on normals.
dhatchen
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:05 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by dhatchen »

I remember some of your posts showing the counters at an earlier stage and these are simply beautiful. Way to go.

A couple of comments that detract in no way from my appreciation of your fine work.

1. I didn't notice the SS Elite/non-Elite yellow until I read a later post and went back to see. I could just be my limited powers of observation...

2. I would really prefer the 'Tank Tread' in the ARM and MECH to be a little more rounded on the corners. Many of the NATO symbols I have seen have Half Circles on the ends or Ovals. This would be going too far, especially for redraw times, but may be another pixel or two?
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: dhatchen

I remember some of your posts showing the counters at an earlier stage and these are simply beautiful. Way to go.

A couple of comments that detract in no way from my appreciation of your fine work.

1. I didn't notice the SS Elite/non-Elite yellow until I read a later post and went back to see. I could just be my limited powers of observation...

2. I would really prefer the 'Tank Tread' in the ARM and MECH to be a little more rounded on the corners. Many of the NATO symbols I have seen have Half Circles on the ends or Ovals. This would be going too far, especially for redraw times, but may be another pixel or two?

Here is a more rounded center element for the NATO symbol for armor. I haven't changed the armor HQ so you can see the difference. I prefer the more rounded rendering (10-5 unit) versus the merely rounded rectangle (6-4-3 unit).

I also lengthened the projections on the E for the 1-4 engineer you see here. That makes it look more like the other engieer units - even though the others have shorter projections.

I am going to try to improve the anchors for the marine units. I prefer the ones for the port symbols (the port symbols look better even though they are drawn more crudely - I could smooth them out, but they are due for replacement by the artist later).

Opinions?

Image
Attachments
ArmorEngi..022006.jpg
ArmorEngi..022006.jpg (57.82 KiB) Viewed 282 times
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
dhatchen
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:05 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by dhatchen »

I am playing with the quote function here a bit. Ihope this turns out as I intend.
ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets

Here is a more rounded center element for the NATO symbol for armor. I haven't changed the armor HQ so you can see the difference. I prefer the more rounded rendering (10-5 unit) versus the merely rounded rectangle (6-4-3 unit).
That is exactly what I like.[:)]
I also lengthened the projections on the E for the 1-4 engineer you see here. That makes it look more like the other engieer units - even though the others have shorter projections.
Looks right.
I am going to try to improve the anchors for the marine units. I prefer the ones for the port symbols (the port symbols look better even though they are drawn more crudely - I could smooth them out, but they are due for replacement by the artist later).

Opinions?
Yes, a cleaned up port symbol has a better look.
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Froonp »

Hello,
Here is a more rounded center element for the NATO symbol for armor. I haven't changed the armor HQ so you can see the difference. I prefer the more rounded rendering (10-5 unit) versus the merely rounded rectangle (6-4-3 unit).
It is even greater this way !!! [:D]
P8654
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2005 10:33 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by P8654 »

The armor and engineers look much better.
"It is better to be on the ground wishing you were in the air than in the air wishing you were on the ground."
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

Here is another pass at the NATO symbols for armor and marines.

The Armor HQ is a bit more round than the Armor unit, which in turn is a bit more rounded than the Armor Artillery.

I prefer the middle one. What do you think?

And the Marine?

Image
Attachments
ArmorMari..022006.jpg
ArmorMari..022006.jpg (38.48 KiB) Viewed 282 times
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
stretch
Posts: 637
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by stretch »

I like the middle one.

The marine anchor almost seems over the top to me, if I had to pick I'd stick with the previous one. But something in the middle (with respect to curvature on the ends, not sure what that part of an anchor is called) would probably be best.
User avatar
Mziln
Posts: 667
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Mziln »

ORIGINAL: stretch

I like the middle one.

The marine anchor almost seems over the top to me, if I had to pick I'd stick with the previous one. But something in the middle (with respect to curvature on the ends, not sure what that part of an anchor is called) would probably be best.

Link to discription of the parts of an Anchor
JanSorensen
Posts: 2536
Joined: Sun May 01, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by JanSorensen »

I concur with stretch

The middle armor looks better than the other two - and the large marine anchor looks wrong.
buckyzoom
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:26 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by buckyzoom »

I prefer the middle one, also. I would like the three line anchor for marines (basically a crucifix with a smile)
There are more things under Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophies...
Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: buckyzoom

I prefer the middle one, also. I would like the three line anchor for marines (basically a crucifix with a smile)

Do you have a picture of one somewhere?

Mziln's link was worth reading but I still would like a simple sample graphic of an anchor to model the NATO symbol on.

--------------

It is nice to see everyone agree with me.

I liked the center armor and thought the anchor was too big relative to the other symbols.
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
dhatchen
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 8:05 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by dhatchen »

Middle one for the Armour.

The Marine anchour isn't quite it yet, but is a LOT better.
The bottom is too prominent. It seems a little thick, but maybe if the bottom was a little smaller in length and height it might match the stem and cross piece better???
User avatar
Froonp
Posts: 7998
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 8:23 pm
Location: Marseilles, France
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Froonp »

ORIGINAL: Shannon V. OKeets
Here is another pass at the NATO symbols for armor and marines.
The Armor HQ is a bit more round than the Armor unit, which in turn is a bit more rounded than the Armor Artillery.
I prefer the middle one. What do you think?
Same. Middle one.
And the Marine?
Image
Nice drawing, but a little too much IMO.
The original WiF FE MAR symbol is simpler indeed.


Image
Attachments
USMARIMar64.jpg
USMARIMar64.jpg (3.05 KiB) Viewed 283 times
buckyzoom
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:26 pm

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by buckyzoom »

Something like this,



Image
Attachments
anchor.jpg
anchor.jpg (2.04 KiB) Viewed 282 times
There are more things under Heaven and Earth than are dreamt of in your philosophies...
pak19652002
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:40 am
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by pak19652002 »

Middle armor looks best to me.

Regarding the MAR with the port anchor, I think this was a bold and worthy experiment that should terminated immediately before it escapes the lab and spreads to the general population.[X(]

Just add a few pixels to the ends of the normal anchor and call it a day!

Peter

Shannon V. OKeets
Posts: 22165
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 11:51 pm
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Contact:

RE: Unit Depictions on Screen

Post by Shannon V. OKeets »

ORIGINAL: pak19652002

Middle armor looks best to me.

Regarding the MAR with the port anchor, I think this was a bold and worthy experiment that should terminated immediately before it escapes the lab and spreads to the general population.[X(]

Just add a few pixels to the ends of the normal anchor and call it a day!

Peter


Ok. I'll go back to where I started and make only minor changes to that anchor. But I am not sure what to do about this tatoo I now have on my forearm!?
Steve

Perfection is an elusive goal.
Post Reply

Return to “World in Flames”