Ship graphics

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Ship graphics

Post by JWE »

ORIGINAL: Chad Harrison
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
. . . snip . . .
All either small or late war, but a lot of modder fodder.
Sorry to dig up an old thread, but I am passing time with nothing to do at work and came across Don's comment above.

How much of Eastern fleet(s) shipping is going to be in stock AE's OOB? Or in other words, how many ships are going to show up in stock AE from Europe after Germany's surrender?

I know that the Europe land units made the cut for stock AE, but this is the first I have heard any mention of what will/will not be in as far as post German surrender, ETO ships. Honestly I have no idea what was planned in reality, but I would imagine that a large number of ships would be coming to the Pacific for the upcoming Downfall Operation.

Don's comments above make it sound like they are going to be missing from stock AE. If so, was this to save on database space, or the time to get them in?

Or the fact that like 2 PBEM's have made it into 1945 [:D]

Thanks in advance and keep up the great work!

Chad
Lots will be there. I think most of the majors that got assigned to Downfall will show up; Nelson, Anson, the CVs, tons of DDs and CAs, stuff like that.

Lots won't be there also. Reason is we already have 10,000 ships, and adding another 4,000 for the last six months of game time seemed a trifle much. Especially as there wouldn't be anything left afloat for them to fight. But, you will get all the sexy ones.
User avatar
kfmiller41
Posts: 1063
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 9:00 pm
Location: Saint Marys, Ga
Contact:

RE: Ship graphics

Post by kfmiller41 »

You know the amount of stuff you guys KNOW about this just boggles the mind of lesser beings like me[&o]
You have the ability to arouse various emotions in me: please select carefully.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Ship graphics

Post by DuckofTindalos »

ORIGINAL: JWE

ORIGINAL: Chad Harrison
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
. . . snip . . .
All either small or late war, but a lot of modder fodder.
Sorry to dig up an old thread, but I am passing time with nothing to do at work and came across Don's comment above.

How much of Eastern fleet(s) shipping is going to be in stock AE's OOB? Or in other words, how many ships are going to show up in stock AE from Europe after Germany's surrender?

I know that the Europe land units made the cut for stock AE, but this is the first I have heard any mention of what will/will not be in as far as post German surrender, ETO ships. Honestly I have no idea what was planned in reality, but I would imagine that a large number of ships would be coming to the Pacific for the upcoming Downfall Operation.

Don's comments above make it sound like they are going to be missing from stock AE. If so, was this to save on database space, or the time to get them in?

Or the fact that like 2 PBEM's have made it into 1945 [:D]

Thanks in advance and keep up the great work!

Chad
Lots will be there. I think most of the majors that got assigned to Downfall will show up; Nelson, Anson, the CVs, tons of DDs and CAs, stuff like that.

Lots won't be there also. Reason is we already have 10,000 ships, and adding another 4,000 for the last six months of game time seemed a trifle much. Especially as there wouldn't be anything left afloat for them to fight. But, you will get all the sexy ones.

Of course, this is the grand campaign (scenario 1) that John's talking about. For the Downfall scenario, all sorts of stuff can be thrown in... Once I get around to start making it...[:D]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
Yamato hugger
Posts: 3791
Joined: Tue Oct 05, 2004 5:38 am

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Yamato hugger »

ORIGINAL: witpqs

ORIGINAL: JWE
ORIGINAL: bradfordkay
At sea... on land Gilligan was anything but fearless! Luckily that deserted island had a good network of footpaths for him to use when running away from danger...
Ginger, or MaryAnn ?

[edit] Oh gosh ... I should NOT have done that ! If you guys have any mercy whatsoever, please don't go there !

Why choose? [:D]

Hell, Maryann STILL looks good. (even that mug shot)
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: JWE

Lots will be there. I think most of the majors that got assigned to Downfall will show up; Nelson, Anson, the CVs, tons of DDs and CAs, stuff like that.

Lots won't be there also. Reason is we already have 10,000 ships, and adding another 4,000 for the last six months of game time seemed a trifle much. Especially as there wouldn't be anything left afloat for them to fight. But, you will get all the sexy ones.

Thanks for the reply John. Sounds like a perfect balance to me.

Keep up the great work and in case the 50 other comments in this thread didn't get the point across, the new ship art is simply amazing!

Thanks again

Chad
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Chad Harrison »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

For the Downfall scenario, all sorts of stuff can be thrown in... Once I get around to start making it...[:D]

If I remember correctly, this scenario is going to be included in an official patch after release right?

Just curious, but what will the dates of the scenario be?
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Ship graphics

Post by JWE »

Yummm .. MaryAnn. Concur YH! [8D]

Didn’t mean to sound cavalier about Downfall, hope Termie forgives me. Most of the 4000 ships would be Libertys, Victorys, Park/Forts, Sams, sweepers, sloops, corvettes, those sorts of things.

We do have lots in the box that relates to Downfall. All sorts of Brit warships, down to and including Loch and Bay type frigates, and a bunch of CLs that went back to Blighty for CLAA conversion, that likely would have shown up. Heck, we have Midways, Alaskas, Gearing Mod-1s, etc … You get monster floating docks, and a fleet train that you can organize into a traveling Port-8 + Shipyard, or two to three traveling Port-5 + Shipyards. They are all in the box (data and art). Many show up in the base scenario, but they are all available for use in the Downfall mod.

As to shipping, per se, in the regular scenario, you’ll get darn near all the “amphibious assault” assets the Brits had – Glens, Stars, Empires, Brigades, as well as the late war US assets, P2 and C4 Admiral and General classes of transports. When 12th Army Group shows up in SFO, you will be able to schlep at least an Army at a time.

Don is working on developing the sweepers, sloops, corvettes, frigates, cutters, etc .. to make things more balanced and robust. Needless to say, data and art development follow the scenario designer. Anything that Termie needs for Downfall, he gets.
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Ship graphics

Post by DuckofTindalos »

This is correct. It starts a bit before X-Day for Operation Olympic (11/1/45). I haven't decided how far it'll run yet.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: JWE

Yummm .. MaryAnn. Concur YH! [8D]

Didn’t mean to sound cavalier about Downfall, hope Termie forgives me. Most of the 4000 ships would be Libertys, Victorys, Park/Forts, Sams, sweepers, sloops, corvettes, those sorts of things.

We do have lots in the box that relates to Downfall. All sorts of Brit warships, down to and including Loch and Bay type frigates, and a bunch of CLs that went back to Blighty for CLAA conversion, that likely would have shown up. Heck, we have Midways, Alaskas, Gearing Mod-1s, etc … You get monster floating docks, and a fleet train that you can organize into a traveling Port-8 + Shipyard, or two to three traveling Port-5 + Shipyards. They are all in the box (data and art). Many show up in the base scenario, but they are all available for use in the Downfall mod.

As to shipping, per se, in the regular scenario, you’ll get darn near all the “amphibious assault” assets the Brits had – Glens, Stars, Empires, Brigades, as well as the late war US assets, P2 and C4 Admiral and General classes of transports. When 12th Army Group shows up in SFO, you will be able to schlep at least an Army at a time.

Don is working on developing the sweepers, sloops, corvettes, frigates, cutters, etc .. to make things more balanced and robust. Needless to say, data and art development follow the scenario designer. Anything that Termie needs for Downfall, he gets.

Canada was to receive a CVL, 2 CL, and a full flotilla of modern "C" class destroyers from the Royal Navy, all for Pacific deployment. They were to be crewed by laying up the convoy escorts that had fought the battle of the Atlantic. The RCN was also to provide 40+ River class frigates for general escort to the British Pacific Fleet and East Indies Fleet. Somewhat more than 40 were in the process of tropicalization when the war ended and a few were already on the west coast.

The British were also transferring very large numbers of modern landing ships and craft, including the British build LST(3) - somewhat faster than LST(2). These were built by the British using different engines when US allocations of LST(2) fell short. Also the big Fairmile Dog boats - MTB/MGB put mostly in MGB configuration. Interesting, but hard to emulate in AE, were the LCG(L). These were modified LCT with two army type 4.7'' guns (and a few light AA). They were not capable of offshore bombardment, but were to be run onto the beach and used as a stationary, instantly available, battery.

The French were also sending along a few more ships. Not too much data on them (help, anyone) but they included at least one more big destroyer, a few colonial sloops, and some escorts/minecraft.

There's also the very interesting German Standard Type "Hansa" ships. Large numbers of these were taken over by the British after Germany surrendered, given Empire names, and sent to the Far East.

And so much more....


User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Chad Harrison »

John, Don and Terminus
 
Thanks again for all the replies. Personally, I love all the late war stuff, so I am really excited to see all these last minute toys show up in late 1945. Will be really fun to play with them that late in the game! Thanks again for the details.
 
If the Operation Downfall scenario starts November 1st, and would include the planned invasion of Kyushu, and then Tokyo, I would think that around five or six months would be needed to have it really play out nicely. Enough time for the troops to get ashore, and the Japanease played to have ample time to make an attempt to get them out, at each beachhead.
 
Along those same lines, are there any other official scenarios already planned for post release? Downfall is the only one I have heard of.
 
Would love to see ones for the American invasion of the Phillipines.
 
Regardless, keep up the great work and thanks again for the replies!
 
Chad
 
 
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Ship graphics

Post by DuckofTindalos »

At the moment, Downfall is the only post-release scenario we're talking about. I'm doing it because I have the least skill in other post-release activities, so the people who do have those skills can do the important patching stuff.

As for Downfall, the length of the scenario will be dictated by playtesting results. The Aleutian scenario was shortened a bit after playtesting, in order to be more interesting.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Chad Harrison
Posts: 1384
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
Location: Boise, ID - USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Chad Harrison »

Thanks for the reply Termy, and as always, the hard work by the team.
 
The Aleutian campaign is the first one I am playing with, so Im glad you put it together and its getting lots of testing. Its a theatre I have never had to deal with before, so I am curious to see how it plays out. I would imagine that I will not be the only person cutting their AE teeth on the Aleutian scenario.
 
Regardless of the length of the Downfall scenario, I think it will be a great blast to play as few games make it to that point. Late war stuff is fun [:D]
Flying Tiger
Posts: 496
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 11:45 pm
Location: ummmm... i HATE that question!

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Flying Tiger »

Totally agree with Chad's comment - as an AI only player none of my games get close to  1945, so all those cool end game ships and planes remain unseen. Will be great to get a chance to meddle with all that fun stuff. Good idea to whoever came up with the idea.
User avatar
Skyland
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: France

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Skyland »

ORIGINAL: Don Bowen

The French were also sending along a few more ships. Not too much data on them (help, anyone) but they included at least one more big destroyer, a few colonial sloops, and some escorts/minecraft.


This is what i found about them :

October 3rd 1945 in Saigon :
Troops : 1000 mens (5th DIC, Colonial Inf Division)
BB : Richelieu
DD : Le Triomphant
British liners Queen Emma and Princess Beatrix
Motor boat/AM (ex customs) : Directeur général Frezouls, Directeur général Crayssac

From October 15th in Saigon :
Troops : BMEO (Far East Marine Brigade)
CL : Gloire, Suffren
Aviso : Gazelle, Annamite
DD : Le Fantasque,
DE : Sénégalais, Somali
CV : Bearn (as planes and troop transport)
Cargo/Passengers ship: Ville de Strasbourg
AMC : Quercy

From March 6th 1946 in Haiphong
Troops : 20000 mens (9th DIC, half of 2e DB (armored division), BMEO,... )
CV : Béarn (as planes and troop transport)
AMC : Barfleur
Cargo/Passengers ship : Eridan, Lieutenant de Saint Loubert Bié, ... (total 5)
Many LST, LCI, ...
CL : Emile Bertin, Tourville, Duquesne,
Aviso colonial : Savorgnan de Brazza
DD : Le Triomphant, Le Fantasque
Aviso : Chevreuil, Gazelle
DE : Algérien
Oiler : Var


User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Ship graphics

Post by JWE »

And for the $64,000 question: which French Admiral demanded overall command of all Allied Naval vessels operating the South China Sea.
User avatar
Don Bowen
Posts: 5190
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Georgetown, Texas, USA

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Don Bowen »

ORIGINAL: JWE

And for the $64,000 question: which French Admiral demanded overall command of all Allied Naval vessels operating the South China Sea.

All of them?
User avatar
dwesolick
Posts: 610
Joined: Mon Jun 24, 2002 7:33 am
Location: Colorado

RE: Ship graphics

Post by dwesolick »

ORIGINAL: JWE

And for the $64,000 question: which French Admiral demanded overall command of all Allied Naval vessels operating the South China Sea.

Bah! A Frenchman would never be so presumptuous! [8|]
"The Navy has a moth-eaten tradition that the captain who loses his ship is disgraced. What do they have all those ships for, if not to hurl them at the enemy?" --Douglas MacArthur
User avatar
Skyland
Posts: 285
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 1:30 pm
Location: France

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Skyland »

ORIGINAL: JWE

And for the $64,000 question: which French Admiral demanded overall command of all Allied Naval vessels operating the South China Sea.


Don't know. Seems strange to me. Never heard such a thing.
User avatar
JWE
Posts: 5039
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 5:02 pm

RE: Ship graphics

Post by JWE »

Lord Louie was complaining to London in Aug. 1945 about the FFL gallivanting off to Indochina instead of supporting Zipper/Tiderace, and demanding that all operations past 104 E come under FFL command.

Just wondered who that was. Don’t think D’Argenlieu had quite the rank, at the time. Could have been Muselier, but I just don’t know. Thought somebody out there might.
User avatar
Kereguelen
Posts: 1474
Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 9:08 pm

RE: Ship graphics

Post by Kereguelen »

ORIGINAL: JWE

Lord Louie was complaining to London in Aug. 1945 about the FFL gallivanting off to Indochina instead of supporting Zipper/Tiderace, and demanding that all operations past 104 E come under FFL command.

Just wondered who that was. Don’t think D’Argenlieu had quite the rank, at the time. Could have been Muselier, but I just don’t know. Thought somebody out there might.

Must have been Vice-Admiral Philippe Auboyneau. Muselier was not at good terms with de Gaulle and Auboyneau was in command of French Naval Forces in the Far East (Forces navales d'Extrême-Orient) in 1945.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”