- Per event choice: Russia signed a peace treaty with Japan - resulting probably in reinforcements from Far East. (Ironically, the way events work in PBEM, I had to make this choice acting in Russia's behalf. I was tempted to actually choose .....)
(snippage)
- Per event choice: US decides on European focus (my choice again acting in Gary's behalf, it was bitter to decide on my own demise).
Concerning the actual PBEM mechanism for this - do I gather correctly that, as each choice is reported to you (and I understand that it only happens at a certain game phase) you have to stop play, maybe save, send an email (or PM or voice call) to your opponent, report the options, get the decision, apply it then continue and wait for the next decision point?

Or are you, as an ethical player, automatically applying the less desirable option from your own PoV, as a doctrine, thus removing the need for the constant? back-and-forthing?

It may be obvious to you as an experienced PBEM gamer how to do these things, but I have yet to start my first and I want to be as less a NOOB as I can be, when the time comes.
Next question:

In another thread you mentioned the house rules you've agreed on.

Would you please publish them as a starting point for those of us who have yet to work up a set of "standard" house rules for ambit claims when negotiating a new game? Or are they highly classified?