Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post here to meet players for MP games and generally engage in ribbing and banter about your prowess.

Moderator: Vic

User avatar
all5n
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Republic of Texas

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by all5n »

I got vic's turn to daniel, and i forwarded it to daniel.
 
Have not heard back yet.
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

Always the same [:(]
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

In case Daniel is MIA we should probably end this game, or ?
Can´t see any reason to continue.
What do you guy´s think ?
Grymme
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:06 pm
Contact:

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by Grymme »

Hi
 
I got email from Danel Yesterday. So atleast he is communicato. He says that Roys surrendered and he gave me option of continuing to play with his empire or to surrender it. So the game is potentioally on again. It would only be 4 players left, with me playing Daniel.
 
I am in Greece till sunday so you can think about it.
My Advanced Tactics Mod page
http://atgscenarios.wordpress.com

30+ scenarios, maps and mods for AT and AT:G
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

I´m confused. Roy surrendered ?
Why he did not tell us this and why you have to play Daniels turns now ?
He surrendered, too ?
 
I would continue if you want to play Daniels turns.
User avatar
Tac2i
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:57 pm
Location: WV USA

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by Tac2i »

ORIGINAL: seille

I´m confused. Roy surrendered ?
Why he did not tell us this and why you have to play Daniels turns now ?
He surrendered, too ?

I would continue if you want to play Daniels turns.

I didn't surrender but was thinking about doing so. Daniel convinced me and Vic to let him play our turns instead, so that is what we did. Not sure why Daniel is quitting unless he thinks the situation is hopeless.
Tac2i (formerly webizen)
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

I don´t like the situation and Daniels behavior, but i would continue if one of his
allies will take command over his territory.
 
@Vic
In case you read this.
Maybe you can implement a option to give allies command over own troops.
So if one of the allied players surrender the other can simply overtake his terrain and troops.
In the actualt case Daniel could use such a function to convert his troops and Terrain to
Grymme´s colors. Would be helpful and his probbaly to do by the actual event engine.
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

What is the actual status of this game ??
Do we continue or not ?
Grymme
Posts: 1776
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 5:06 pm
Contact:

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by Grymme »

Hi Seille
 
The Situation. As i understand it is the following.
 
Vic has surrendered or given his password to daníel.
Roy has surrendered or given his password to daniel. Prob the later.
 
I got an email from Daniel with a turn and Old Armys password. I dont know if that is his password or who it is. He said in password that Roy was surrendering.
 
When i opened the turn it was old armys turn. It also said that the Deep Confederation & Muslim Imperium has surrendered.
 
This leads me to the conclusion that the game currently has 4 players. I didnt play the turn but closed it down instead.
 
Roy - That i have password to.
Seille -
Allin -
Grymme -(me)
 
 
Since i was pretty much allied with daniel & Vic that surrendered my possibilites in the game are slim. I have 26 cities & Roy 18 (44 cities) against your 83 cities. I could ask you to not ally against me, but it hardly seems fair. 
 
I probably open to continue the game in some form, but it doesnt seem much fun if you are gonna gang up on me. Cant really ask you not to eather though. 
 
My Advanced Tactics Mod page
http://atgscenarios.wordpress.com

30+ scenarios, maps and mods for AT and AT:G
User avatar
all5n
Posts: 371
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 7:38 pm
Location: Republic of Texas

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by all5n »

This game is officially dead.  Daniel had the largest empire, and he quit.  The Seille/Allan axis seemed to be on the upswing at the time, but we may never know.  I did have a lot of fun playing this game while it was running.
 
People that dissapear and just stop playing suck.
seille
Posts: 2048
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 8:25 am
Location: Germany

RE: Iron Age III: CLOSED

Post by seille »

ORIGINAL: all5n

This game is officially dead.  Daniel had the largest empire, and he quit.  The Seille/Allan axis seemed to be on the upswing at the time, but we may never know.  I did have a lot of fun playing this game while it was running.

People that dissapear and just stop playing suck.

I agree and can understand Grymme that he don´t want to continue.
If it would be possible to merge his own empire with the ones of his surrendered former allies it would be
possible to continue.
But as it is now Allan would pick a lot of Daniels cities.

I think it was a fair game and after i noticed that Daniel and Grymme are allied i was very happy to build a alliance
with Allan. Playing alone was a mistake i made in Iron Age II....

Too sad Daniel left the game this way, very bad manner.
Such guy´s i won´t play a second time. Fortunately there are many very reliable AT players available.

I´m open for a new game.
Post Reply

Return to “Opponents Wanted”