OT: A-10's in Korea!

This new stand alone release based on the legendary War in the Pacific from 2 by 3 Games adds significant improvements and changes to enhance game play, improve realism, and increase historical accuracy. With dozens of new features, new art, and engine improvements, War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition brings you the most realistic and immersive WWII Pacific Theater wargame ever!

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Ambassador
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Ambassador »

ORIGINAL: CV10

ORIGINAL: BBfanboy

ORIGINAL: btd64




Yes, Red Storm Rising. Thank you Range Joe....GP
No - RSR was a Tom Clancy book about the USSR attacking Europe and in the Atlantic. Red Dawn was the one about Russian Paratroops taking a town in the USA.

I'm pretty sure that Clancy's Red Storm Rising is the book where A-10 come to be known as the Devil's Cross.

At any rate, they're great ground attack planes.
It is so. Red Storm Rising is a great book, and that nickname for the Warthog is spot on. Usually, it’s the first thing coming to my mind every time I see footage of an A-10.

Red Dawn is not a book, but a Hollywood movie with a stupidly improbable premise.

And the A-10 is indeed a great ground attack plane. Err... « flying cannon which also drops bombs »[:D]
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
User avatar
Randy Stead
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Randy Stead »

When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.

Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
User avatar
RhinoDad
Posts: 274
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2020 12:34 pm

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RhinoDad »

The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
Improvise, Adapt and Overcome

Success is how you bounce on the bottom

Experience is a comb life gives us after we have lost our hair
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Not true.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.

Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Not true.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!


Really? 48 years old and still vibrant? Yeah, okay, I was told the F-35 would replace the A10, F16 and F15. What happened to that? Quit digging.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.

Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52

Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.

Not true.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!


Really? 48 years old and still vibrant? Yeah, okay, I was told the F-35 would replace the A10, F16 and F15. What happened to that? Quit digging.

Komrade, They came and talked to you personally? Wow, you must be special. Say hello to Putin, Komrade.

Komrade, as far as digging, that is how many things are mined.

Komrade, how is your supply of medicine holding out?

Sieg Heil, Komrades!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
JeffroK
Posts: 6422
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 4:05 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by JeffroK »

ORIGINAL: Randy Stead

When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.

Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
You got some good FA-18's from OZ, only a million flying hours, only driven to church on Sunday's.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: JeffroK

ORIGINAL: Randy Stead

When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.

Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
You got some good FA-18's from OZ, only a million flying hours, only driven to church on Sunday's.

Canada must be good for recycling things . . . [;)]
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
Randy Stead
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2000 10:00 am
Location: Ontario, Canada

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Randy Stead »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RhinoDad



Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.

Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52

Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!


There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RhinoDad



Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.

Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52

Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!

1. Mr. Nazi quote aficionado; I'm not your "Komrade".

2. B-52s dared not enter Yugo airspace some 20+ years ago. Archai.

3 My father nearly died in a DC in 1943. Shall I do the math for you?


The stupid is strong on this thread.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: Randy Stead

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961




Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52

Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!


There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.


So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961




Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.

Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52

Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!

1. Mr. Nazi quote aficionado; I'm not your "Komrade".

2. B-52s dared not enter Yugo airspace some 20+ years ago. Archai.

3 My father nearly died in a DC in 1943. Shall I do the math for you?


The stupid is strong on this thread.

1) Komrade, who is quoting Nazis? Who is denigrating the USA?[8|]

2) Komrade, there was no "Yugo" airspace some 20+ years ago. At least, not the Jugoslavia that we loved.

3) Yes, the Soviets had DC-3s in 1943. No math needed, Komrade.

Yes, Komrade, you are strong on this thread.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Randy Stead

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe




Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?

The B-52 is not laughable.

The DC-3s are still being used.

Run home and get in contact with President Kim.

Sieg Heil, Komrade!


There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.


So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.

Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]

Hagel zu Musketen!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
Rusty1961
Posts: 1239
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:18 am

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by Rusty1961 »

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: Randy Stead





There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.


So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.

Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]

Hagel zu Musketen!

Dude, wtf is your malfunction? Stop talking about men's groin.

BFYTW
God made man, but Sam Colt made them equal.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19203
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by RangerJoe »

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961

ORIGINAL: RangerJoe

ORIGINAL: Rusty1961





So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.

Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]

Hagel zu Musketen!

Dude, wtf is your malfunction? Stop talking about men's groin.

BFYTW

Komrade, does it bother you to think of an "obsolete" weapon being used to injure your groin area?[:'(]

Sieg Heil, Komraden!!
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by fcooke »

Buffs are not obsolete and will outlive B-1s and B-2s, because they are cost efficient and can leverage stand-off weapons. The Air Force has been trying to get rid of the A-10 forever, with the F-35 being claimed as the plane that do everything, but does nothing terribly well, and costs a fortune. And a drone cannot lift that cannon that the A-10 can. And the troops on the ground seem to appreciate the A-10. They do they heavy lifting so that should count for something.

And F-4s came without guns initially. That changed PDQ when missiles were not the be all end all.

And I would fly a DC3/C47 anytime.

Or a 747 (a lot of Buff tech in that plane).

I will now shush before this gets more political.
fcooke
Posts: 1158
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2002 10:37 pm
Location: Boston, London, Hoboken, now Warwick, NY

RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!

Post by fcooke »

On a side note.....my copy of Sieg Heil came from a co-worker when I was still working. Seems it came from her father in law who was a rear-admiral in the USN, passed away, and left a bunch of books to her. Didn't write down his name but hope to find it when I start reading the collection she gifted me.
Post Reply

Return to “War in the Pacific: Admiral's Edition”