Warspite1ORIGINAL: anarchyintheuk
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Warspite1ORIGINAL: sprior
Neither T nor I suggested that.
Three things:
1) I can't spell giving
2) I never suggested either of you did. I was pointing out that T's earlier comment was out of place. Boredom and/or Obama bashing has nothing to do with the strength of feeling over the Falklands.
3) The act of betrayal would come courtesy of our spineless buffons in Westminster, "persuaded" by a US administration keen to get South America on side.
Edit: I can't spell spineless either [8|]
3) You're assuming the current (and I can't stress that enough) administration has taken this stance as part of a logically thought out process to change the perception of the US in South America. I think that's giving our government, including the state department, way too much credit. Somewhere along the way geographical proximity was substituted for self-determination.
Well I can't say much for US politics and politicians, but as far as the majority of our recent leaders are concerned, they "wouldn't recognise a subtle plan if it painted itself purple and danced naked on a harpsicord singing subtle plans are here again."
