
Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Helm caught and sunk!


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (94.69 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Phelps caught and sunk!


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (94.3 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The tide is turning...against us!


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (103.89 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Daylight arrives...


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (91.44 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Air power...no fighter protection...


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (122.64 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Going in fast and low...


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (84.94 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
And the bloody day is over...but, wait, another deliberate attack on the Ankang road...and we hold!
Ground combat at 83,45 (near Nanyang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 28313 troops, 281 guns, 251 vehicles, Assault Value = 867
Defending force 22556 troops, 120 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 564
Japanese adjusted assault: 413
Allied adjusted defense: 1219
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
756 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 21 (2 destroyed, 19 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
354 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Assaulting units:
15th Division
13th Tank Regiment
116th Division
3rd Tank Regiment
5th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
10th Tank Regiment
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
13th Army
11th Field Artillery Regiment
Defending units:
55th Chinese Corps
41st Chinese Corps
77th Chinese Corps

SB recon did a good job at pinpointing IJA troop movement off road in this picture![:)]
Ground combat at 83,45 (near Nanyang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 28313 troops, 281 guns, 251 vehicles, Assault Value = 867
Defending force 22556 troops, 120 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 564
Japanese adjusted assault: 413
Allied adjusted defense: 1219
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), fatigue(-), experience(-)
supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
756 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 55 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Vehicles lost 21 (2 destroyed, 19 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
354 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 42 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Assaulting units:
15th Division
13th Tank Regiment
116th Division
3rd Tank Regiment
5th Tank Regiment
23rd Tank Regiment
10th Tank Regiment
51st Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
13th Army
11th Field Artillery Regiment
Defending units:
55th Chinese Corps
41st Chinese Corps
77th Chinese Corps

SB recon did a good job at pinpointing IJA troop movement off road in this picture![:)]
- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (338.53 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
What a day...don't know how it all turned out yet!
We should still have a strong force rearmed at Maryborough for this next day...
We should still have a strong force rearmed at Maryborough for this next day...
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
I have three B-29 aces now. Use them instead... [:'(]ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.
I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
; Julia Child

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing!
“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: witpqs
I have three B-29 aces now. Use them instead... [:'(]ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
2nd Lt. Ellard has 2 kills, 8 others have one kill flying beasts.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
There is a way to get the fighters to sweep first . . . [;)]
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.
Won't that increase my stack level...perhaps overloading the facility?
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Recap:
Haguro, 1Torp, 8 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nachi: sunk
Furutaka: 4Hits, Hvy F
Myoko: 14 hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nagara: 3 Hits
Kiso: 12 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Mikuma: 3 Hits, 1 1000# hit (bounced)
Aoba: 1 hit, 1 1000# hit (penetrated)
Mogami: 3 hits
DD Hyashio sunk
Kagero: on fire
Nasushio, 2 Hits on fire
Mutsuki, 1 hit, on fire
Hagikaze: 2 hits, on fire
Yunagi: 1 hit
Uzuki: 1 500# hit
Haguro, 1Torp, 8 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nachi: sunk
Furutaka: 4Hits, Hvy F
Myoko: 14 hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Nagara: 3 Hits
Kiso: 12 Hits, Hvy F, Hvy D
Mikuma: 3 Hits, 1 1000# hit (bounced)
Aoba: 1 hit, 1 1000# hit (penetrated)
Mogami: 3 hits
DD Hyashio sunk
Kagero: on fire
Nasushio, 2 Hits on fire
Mutsuki, 1 hit, on fire
Hagikaze: 2 hits, on fire
Yunagi: 1 hit
Uzuki: 1 500# hit
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
No. Divided squadrons count as 1.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
That is true, but when the entire squadron elects not to fly because of a failed roll...
If you break them into thirds, then the /A, /B, /C will have lower numbers and be checked first. If they pass, then they tend to have their combats decided first.
Won't that increase my stack level...perhaps overloading the facility?
It's a little more complicated if they go to different bases, but as far as I have seen I've never been penalized for it.
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
The butchers bill...probably scuttle two more destroyers today.


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (186.66 KiB) Viewed 474 times
- JohnDillworth
- Posts: 3104
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 5:22 pm
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?
Today I come bearing an olive branch in one hand, and the freedom fighter's gun in the other. Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. I repeat, do not let the olive branch fall from my hand. - Yasser Arafat Speech to UN General Assembly
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
It is very messy here...IJA has close to 2K AV at Rockhampton via the rule of 30.


- Attachments
-
- a.jpg (565.25 KiB) Viewed 474 times
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?
Yep, maybe as many as three went down...not sure if Kiso carries floatplanes. 1 plane for CL if they have them, 2-3 planes for most Cruisers, although some carry as many as 5 like Tone.
Nachi had 2 according to the combat report.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Typically they come with one Jake and two Petes, but can add another FP. But to me 3 Jakes and 8 Petes = 2 CA and CL.ORIGINAL: JohnDillworth
That's a lot of float planes for a single CA, no?
No matter how bad a situation is, you can always make it worse. - Chris Hadfield : An Astronaut's Guide To Life On Earth




