joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

The only claimed kills so far were made by Halifax crews [X(]

Image
Attachments
onlytopi..dakill.jpg
onlytopi..dakill.jpg (58.38 KiB) Viewed 581 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

and here a overview of the Halifax II

Image
Attachments
Halifaxdata1.jpg
Halifaxdata1.jpg (122.36 KiB) Viewed 581 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

and here part 2 of the Halifax data ( so you can see the electronics and ranges)

Image
Attachments
Halifaxdata2.jpg
Halifaxdata2.jpg (118.93 KiB) Viewed 581 times
User avatar
DuckofTindalos
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by DuckofTindalos »

The game misspells "incendiary" on that screen.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

turn 7 will be a short turn, with only one bombing mission and few NI missions

Image
Attachments
missionsforT7.jpg
missionsforT7.jpg (134.44 KiB) Viewed 581 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

only limited Axis response, and those were too late [:)]

turn 8 is a resting turn, weather and some other reasons

Image
Attachments
cit7.jpg
cit7.jpg (81.63 KiB) Viewed 579 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

The game misspells "incendiary" on that screen.

thanx,
hopefully HS will not use all his spellings [:'(][;)][8|]
User avatar
Hard Sarge
Posts: 22145
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
Location: garfield hts ohio usa
Contact:

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by Hard Sarge »

Bite me buddy

you know that is part of the code, just like the other names you keep wanting Harley to change

nothing I can do with it, other then pass it on to Harley


for what it is worth, the 4 pound and 30 pound are correct, the 100 and 400 are called ICB's (for naming)

that is a old spelling error that is in the code (I never notice it) all I can do is pass it on to Harley (for weapon type)


Image
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

because there were no missions, all units have more ready A/C

for the numbers of industrial damage and terror:
this is a small scenario, therefor there is no repair
all damage is cumulative
Image
Attachments
ci8.jpg
ci8.jpg (81.63 KiB) Viewed 579 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

lets have a look into the Sterling I units:


Image
Attachments
Sterling1units.jpg
Sterling1units.jpg (113 KiB) Viewed 579 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

and now to the A/C data.....the Sterling would have been a great A/C with bigger wings ( and therefor a much better altitude )

Image
Attachments
sterlingi.jpg
sterlingi.jpg (122.58 KiB) Viewed 591 times
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

uups the data is from the Sterling III

part 2

Image
Attachments
sterlingi2.jpg
sterlingi2.jpg (118.36 KiB) Viewed 591 times
User avatar
GShock
Posts: 1204
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA - USA

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by GShock »

I'll just never stop asking myself how they could bomb by night without aiming devices, instruments or...sight on target.
Boy this game amuses me and it appears it's also very complex!
How long will you pretend you can't do anything about it? Support www.animalsasia.org
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

ORIGINAL: GShock

I'll just never stop asking myself how they could bomb by night without aiming devices, instruments or...sight on target.
Boy this game amuses me and it appears it's also very complex!

huch ???
what about the battle of the beams ??
Oboe, H2S, H2X

and many many more devices

see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wo ... _equipment
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

and many of those are in BtR [X(]
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

here are the devices from the old BtR:

Flensburg           
FuG 202             
FuG 212             
FuG 218 Neptun      
FuG 220 SN-2        
FuG 240 Berlin      
Spanner             
Postklystron        
AI Mk.IV Radar      
AI Mk.VII Radar     
AI Mk.X Radar       
H2S Nav.Radar       
H2X Nav.Radar       
Freya               
Mammut              
Gee                 
Oboe                
Monica              
Boozer              
Serrate             
 Perfectos           
Serrate IV          
Jostle              
Mandrel             
Piperack            
Airbourne Cigar     
ELINT Receivers     
User avatar
davidjruss
Posts: 256
Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 11:03 am
Location: Derby, England

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by davidjruss »

Swift ,

How is recon handled in this game you are playing?

Is recon a feature of this scenario at all because if you are just playing BC at night how do you update info regarding damage done and info re possible targets?

This would normally be undertaken by recon units during the day turn.

Davidr
User avatar
von Shagmeister
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Dromahane, Ireland

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by von Shagmeister »

30Aug43

Bomber Command is out in force again. XII.Fl.Kps. orders a maximum effort despite the thick cloud. It is hoped that results will be better than 27Aug43.

The night proves frustrating for the Luftwaffe. Although many fighters are in the air there are relatively few interceptions. FuG 212 gives 25 detections but because of the weather only three lead to interceptions. We have most success over Emden where there is less cloud and the searchlights are of more help in picking out bombers. In total only 35 enemy a/c are destroyed, 22 of them by fighters. To compound the failures of the night RAF Intruders have a number of successes against returning fighters attempting to land, including two of our pre production He 219s.

We must have new sensors that are immune to Window or all our cities will be reduced to rubble.
Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum

User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

ORIGINAL: DavidR

Swift ,

How is recon handled in this game you are playing?

Is recon a feature of this scenario at all because if you are just playing BC at night how do you update info regarding damage done and info re possible targets?

This would normally be undertaken by recon units during the day turn.

Davidr

there is no recon in the 3 nightbombing campaigns.....
this makes them sometimes very hard for the Allied player, because I do not know ( others than by score ) how much I have damaged targets, or how well protected the enemy cities are.

I do not know if we will get some amount of recce in the final version for the 3 BC campaigns
User avatar
wernerpruckner
Posts: 4143
Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm

RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift

Post by wernerpruckner »

for turn 9 I tried once again to hit one target hard - this time Brunswick.
Some smaller raids were made to other targets.

The Brunswick raid is composed of 2 Halifax streams, 3 Lancaster streams and a Mossiebomber pathfinder force.
Halifax will go a long way over the continent and attack from South.
Lancaster will go via the Northern sea and attack from North.
Mossies will fly along the coast ( with all Mossie RCMs) towards Hamburg and than break South to mark Brunswick

Image
Attachments
missionsfor9.jpg
missionsfor9.jpg (165.34 KiB) Viewed 591 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”