
joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
The only claimed kills so far were made by Halifax crews [X(]


- Attachments
-
- onlytopi..dakill.jpg (58.38 KiB) Viewed 581 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
and here a overview of the Halifax II


- Attachments
-
- Halifaxdata1.jpg (122.36 KiB) Viewed 581 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
and here part 2 of the Halifax data ( so you can see the electronics and ranges)


- Attachments
-
- Halifaxdata2.jpg (118.93 KiB) Viewed 581 times
- DuckofTindalos
- Posts: 39781
- Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
- Location: Denmark
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
The game misspells "incendiary" on that screen.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
turn 7 will be a short turn, with only one bombing mission and few NI missions


- Attachments
-
- missionsforT7.jpg (134.44 KiB) Viewed 581 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
only limited Axis response, and those were too late [:)]
turn 8 is a resting turn, weather and some other reasons

turn 8 is a resting turn, weather and some other reasons

- Attachments
-
- cit7.jpg (81.63 KiB) Viewed 579 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
ORIGINAL: Terminus
The game misspells "incendiary" on that screen.
thanx,
hopefully HS will not use all his spellings [:'(][;)][8|]
- Hard Sarge
- Posts: 22145
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: garfield hts ohio usa
- Contact:
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
Bite me buddy 
you know that is part of the code, just like the other names you keep wanting Harley to change
nothing I can do with it, other then pass it on to Harley
for what it is worth, the 4 pound and 30 pound are correct, the 100 and 400 are called ICB's (for naming)
that is a old spelling error that is in the code (I never notice it) all I can do is pass it on to Harley (for weapon type)

you know that is part of the code, just like the other names you keep wanting Harley to change
nothing I can do with it, other then pass it on to Harley
for what it is worth, the 4 pound and 30 pound are correct, the 100 and 400 are called ICB's (for naming)
that is a old spelling error that is in the code (I never notice it) all I can do is pass it on to Harley (for weapon type)

- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
because there were no missions, all units have more ready A/C
for the numbers of industrial damage and terror:
this is a small scenario, therefor there is no repair
all damage is cumulative

for the numbers of industrial damage and terror:
this is a small scenario, therefor there is no repair
all damage is cumulative

- Attachments
-
- ci8.jpg (81.63 KiB) Viewed 579 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
lets have a look into the Sterling I units:


- Attachments
-
- Sterling1units.jpg (113 KiB) Viewed 579 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
and now to the A/C data.....the Sterling would have been a great A/C with bigger wings ( and therefor a much better altitude )


- Attachments
-
- sterlingi.jpg (122.58 KiB) Viewed 591 times
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
uups the data is from the Sterling III
part 2

part 2

- Attachments
-
- sterlingi2.jpg (118.36 KiB) Viewed 591 times
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
I'll just never stop asking myself how they could bomb by night without aiming devices, instruments or...sight on target.
Boy this game amuses me and it appears it's also very complex!
Boy this game amuses me and it appears it's also very complex!
How long will you pretend you can't do anything about it? Support www.animalsasia.org
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
ORIGINAL: GShock
I'll just never stop asking myself how they could bomb by night without aiming devices, instruments or...sight on target.
Boy this game amuses me and it appears it's also very complex!
huch ???
what about the battle of the beams ??
Oboe, H2S, H2X
and many many more devices
see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wo ... _equipment
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
and many of those are in BtR [X(]
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
here are the devices from the old BtR:
Flensburg
FuG 202
FuG 212
FuG 218 Neptun
FuG 220 SN-2
FuG 240 Berlin
Spanner
Postklystron
AI Mk.IV Radar
AI Mk.VII Radar
AI Mk.X Radar
H2S Nav.Radar
H2X Nav.Radar
Freya
Mammut
Gee
Oboe
Monica
Boozer
Serrate
Perfectos
Serrate IV
Jostle
Mandrel
Piperack
Airbourne Cigar
ELINT Receivers
Flensburg
FuG 202
FuG 212
FuG 218 Neptun
FuG 220 SN-2
FuG 240 Berlin
Spanner
Postklystron
AI Mk.IV Radar
AI Mk.VII Radar
AI Mk.X Radar
H2S Nav.Radar
H2X Nav.Radar
Freya
Mammut
Gee
Oboe
Monica
Boozer
Serrate
Perfectos
Serrate IV
Jostle
Mandrel
Piperack
Airbourne Cigar
ELINT Receivers
- davidjruss
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Sat May 25, 2002 11:03 am
- Location: Derby, England
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
Swift ,
How is recon handled in this game you are playing?
Is recon a feature of this scenario at all because if you are just playing BC at night how do you update info regarding damage done and info re possible targets?
This would normally be undertaken by recon units during the day turn.
Davidr
How is recon handled in this game you are playing?
Is recon a feature of this scenario at all because if you are just playing BC at night how do you update info regarding damage done and info re possible targets?
This would normally be undertaken by recon units during the day turn.
Davidr
- von Shagmeister
- Posts: 1273
- Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:46 pm
- Location: Dromahane, Ireland
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
30Aug43
Bomber Command is out in force again. XII.Fl.Kps. orders a maximum effort despite the thick cloud. It is hoped that results will be better than 27Aug43.
The night proves frustrating for the Luftwaffe. Although many fighters are in the air there are relatively few interceptions. FuG 212 gives 25 detections but because of the weather only three lead to interceptions. We have most success over Emden where there is less cloud and the searchlights are of more help in picking out bombers. In total only 35 enemy a/c are destroyed, 22 of them by fighters. To compound the failures of the night RAF Intruders have a number of successes against returning fighters attempting to land, including two of our pre production He 219s.
We must have new sensors that are immune to Window or all our cities will be reduced to rubble.
Bomber Command is out in force again. XII.Fl.Kps. orders a maximum effort despite the thick cloud. It is hoped that results will be better than 27Aug43.
The night proves frustrating for the Luftwaffe. Although many fighters are in the air there are relatively few interceptions. FuG 212 gives 25 detections but because of the weather only three lead to interceptions. We have most success over Emden where there is less cloud and the searchlights are of more help in picking out bombers. In total only 35 enemy a/c are destroyed, 22 of them by fighters. To compound the failures of the night RAF Intruders have a number of successes against returning fighters attempting to land, including two of our pre production He 219s.
We must have new sensors that are immune to Window or all our cities will be reduced to rubble.
Per Speculationem Impellor ad Intelligendum
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
ORIGINAL: DavidR
Swift ,
How is recon handled in this game you are playing?
Is recon a feature of this scenario at all because if you are just playing BC at night how do you update info regarding damage done and info re possible targets?
This would normally be undertaken by recon units during the day turn.
Davidr
there is no recon in the 3 nightbombing campaigns.....
this makes them sometimes very hard for the Allied player, because I do not know ( others than by score ) how much I have damaged targets, or how well protected the enemy cities are.
I do not know if we will get some amount of recce in the final version for the 3 BC campaigns
- wernerpruckner
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2005 1:00 pm
RE: joint AAR Nachtjagd 1 - VonShagmeister vs swift
for turn 9 I tried once again to hit one target hard - this time Brunswick.
Some smaller raids were made to other targets.
The Brunswick raid is composed of 2 Halifax streams, 3 Lancaster streams and a Mossiebomber pathfinder force.
Halifax will go a long way over the continent and attack from South.
Lancaster will go via the Northern sea and attack from North.
Mossies will fly along the coast ( with all Mossie RCMs) towards Hamburg and than break South to mark Brunswick

Some smaller raids were made to other targets.
The Brunswick raid is composed of 2 Halifax streams, 3 Lancaster streams and a Mossiebomber pathfinder force.
Halifax will go a long way over the continent and attack from South.
Lancaster will go via the Northern sea and attack from North.
Mossies will fly along the coast ( with all Mossie RCMs) towards Hamburg and than break South to mark Brunswick

- Attachments
-
- missionsfor9.jpg (165.34 KiB) Viewed 591 times





