I have tried to find a good map on the internet but must admit that I have failed to do so. I scanned in a good map but unfortunately they are to big to post here. If you want I can mail them to you Patrice.
-Orm

Moderator: Shannon V. OKeets


ORIGINAL: Orm
I would like the Swedish railway net to look something like this.
During 3 years of the war some 2 million german troops were transported through Sweden. Most were wounded or soldiers on leave with the exeption of a division with weapons and ammunitions. This used up 10% of the Swedish railcapacity at its peak. The trains and railway was guarded by 15000 Swedish troops. The trains did not pass Stockholm.
-Orm
ORIGINAL: peskpesk
"German troops through Sweden
After Denmark and Norway were invaded on April 9, 1940, Sweden and the other remaining Baltic Sea countries became enclosed by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, then on friendly terms with each other as formalized in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The lengthy fighting in Norway resulted in intensified German demands for indirect support from Sweden, demands that Swedish diplomats were able to fend off by reminding the Germans of the Swedes' feeling of closeness to their Norwegian brethren. With the conclusion of hostilities in Norway this argument became untenable, forcing the Cabinet to give in to German pressure and allow continuous (unarmed) troop transports, via Swedish railroads, between Germany and Norway.
The extent of these transports was kept secret, although spreading rumors soon forced prime minister Per Albin Hansson to admit their existence. Officially the trains transported wounded soldiers and soldiers on leave (permittent-tåg), which would still have been in violation of Sweden's proclaimed neutrality.
In all, close to 100,000 railroad cars had transported two million German soldiers trough Sweden by the time the transit agreement was disbanded on 5 August 1943" source Wikipedia
Without any information whatsoever,[:D] I am willing to bet that the vast majority of the German troops in Norway were in the populous southern/western areas rather than the north. German operations conducted from Norway against Allied convoys would most likely be the cause of casualties. Then there is the rather mundane cycling of troops home on leave and redistribution of which combat units were where. By going through Sweden (and Denmark) those transits would be greatly simplified.ORIGINAL: micheljq
ORIGINAL: peskpesk
"German troops through Sweden
After Denmark and Norway were invaded on April 9, 1940, Sweden and the other remaining Baltic Sea countries became enclosed by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union, then on friendly terms with each other as formalized in the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. The lengthy fighting in Norway resulted in intensified German demands for indirect support from Sweden, demands that Swedish diplomats were able to fend off by reminding the Germans of the Swedes' feeling of closeness to their Norwegian brethren. With the conclusion of hostilities in Norway this argument became untenable, forcing the Cabinet to give in to German pressure and allow continuous (unarmed) troop transports, via Swedish railroads, between Germany and Norway.
The extent of these transports was kept secret, although spreading rumors soon forced prime minister Per Albin Hansson to admit their existence. Officially the trains transported wounded soldiers and soldiers on leave (permittent-tåg), which would still have been in violation of Sweden's proclaimed neutrality.
In all, close to 100,000 railroad cars had transported two million German soldiers trough Sweden by the time the transit agreement was disbanded on 5 August 1943" source Wikipedia
This is an interesting part of WW2 and unknown to me. So if I understand, Germany was sending troops to garrison northern Norway against and eventual allied invasion following what happened in Narvik in 1940 I suppose?
Or even part of this must have been used to carry german troops for the fighting against the british in Narvik I guess, and to garrison against another potential invasion by the allies.
Would you have the same scaled map that shows the north of Finland, for comparison of the wet areas.ORIGINAL: peskpesk
I like the change too, and the map supports the change. Also this is a modern map, before there were less roads and the wetlands/marsh was bigger
![]()
Well, I must say that why not make those changes. They are not very large.ORIGINAL: Orm
I would like the Swedish railway net to look something like this.
During 3 years of the war some 2 million german troops were transported through Sweden. Most were wounded or soldiers on leave with the exeption of a division with weapons and ammunitions. This used up 10% of the Swedish railcapacity at its peak. The trains and railway was guarded by 15000 Swedish troops. The trains did not pass Stockholm.
-Orm
![]()
On the other hand, here is how northern Sweden looked like in the original CWiF.ORIGINAL: Froonp
Well, I must say that why not make those changes. They are not very large.
The only thing that makes me doubt is the bit of railway that you add that links Gallivare to the rest of Sweden, without going through Boden & Lulea. Is it right to allow the Swedish iron to leave Sweden from another port than Lulea if Lulea is enemy controlled ?

ORIGINAL: Froonp
Would you have the same scaled map that shows the north of Finland, for comparison of the wet areas.ORIGINAL: peskpesk
I like the change too, and the map supports the change. Also this is a modern map, before there were less roads and the wetlands/marsh was bigger
![]()
I ask this because one could also say that the wet areas of northern Sweden are depicted on the MWiF map by depicting a lot of rivers, that would maybe not be large enough to appear on the map if there were not the wet areas.
If I could see the same scaled map of northern Finland, we could compare the "amount" of wet areas in nothern Finland, and compare it to the amount of wet areas in northern Sweden, so that a good guess of the right amount of Swamp hexes we need can be found.
PS : I'm reading Stieg Larsson's Millenium books right now, that are set in Sweden, and I like it because it gives me a picture of Sweden that I did not have before -- Before, Sweden was the land of Abba maidens for me -- [:D]


Hey, that's me !ORIGINAL: peskpesk
PS the maidens are very fair, and often fall for southern European guys with a charming accent…![]()
ORIGINAL: Froonp
On the other hand, here is how northern Sweden looked like in the original CWiF.ORIGINAL: Froonp
Well, I must say that why not make those changes. They are not very large.
The only thing that makes me doubt is the bit of railway that you add that links Gallivare to the rest of Sweden, without going through Boden & Lulea. Is it right to allow the Swedish iron to leave Sweden from another port than Lulea if Lulea is enemy controlled ?
You'll notice that your connecting railway in Gallivare was already there, and there also are swamps next to river hexes.
So I think I'll make both your changes, because indeed the original map was already pointing in that direction. Moreover, Incy & PeskPesk, both from there support that.
As a note, I'd say that I changed that originaly so that the MWiF map was closer to the WiF FE Scandinavia map (swamps & rail), but I think that it is OK as you drew it.
![]()
I like to add names at the extremities of railway spurs. What would be the name to add to that spur of railway that extends NW from Stockholm ?ORIGINAL: Orm
I would like the Swedish railway net to look something like this.
During 3 years of the war some 2 million german troops were transported through Sweden. Most were wounded or soldiers on leave with the exeption of a division with weapons and ammunitions. This used up 10% of the Swedish railcapacity at its peak. The trains and railway was guarded by 15000 Swedish troops. The trains did not pass Stockholm.
-Orm
![]()
Also, what would be the best name to add at the crossroad of railways west of Sundsvall ?ORIGINAL: Froonp
I like to add names at the extremities of railway spurs. What would be the name to add to that spur of railway that extends NW from Stockholm ?
Would it be Ostersund ? Or Ange ?ORIGINAL: Froonp
Also, what would be the best name to add at the crossroad of railways west of Sundsvall ?
ORIGINAL: Froonp
Also, where is Hedebyön / Hedestads the island where the action takes place in the Millenium book ?