Rumble in the Southwest witpqs-A vs Andav-J 2011-11-29 to 2017-02-08

Post descriptions of your brilliant victories and unfortunate defeats here.

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 28

Post by witpqs »

The complete combat report, for combat junkies.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(85.09 KiB) Downloaded 13 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19522
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1945 May 28

Post by RangerJoe »

I have not been able to get Intel monkey/tracker to work properly and since I am usually laying on my bed when I am using the computer, it is tedious to get things straightened out in that position.

Yes, where the enemy unit was in the tracker/Intel Monkey stuff. Then it will disappear for awhile if it was killed, then it would show up again but probably back in the Home Islands. That would at least give you an idea when the unit was killed and then when it was bought back.

But like I also said, it would be a a good idea to keep track of killed then rebuilt units separately to at least give you an idea of the strength of the rebuilt units.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 28

Post by witpqs »

With the road/rail net on the Home Islands the situation in terms of what a particular invasion is facing can change too fast for that to be useful. The overall situation doesn't matter to me - the invasions are going in no matter what! [:D]

Of course I am sure that we have firepower superiority over the defenders in the home Islands, so I'm not worried that they might overwhelm us, only that they might stymie our advances at certain points. That's the reason for invading at four widely separated points.
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19522
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1945 May 28

Post by RangerJoe »

Hold them by the nose and kick them in the . . . (Some people might complain if I finished it!)

With your floating artillery, you can also put the hurt on at any coastal targets - as long as there are no minefields there. Would it help if you put minesweepers in bombardment task forces? Keeping the task forces a long way from the coastal defense guns, of course.

Also, by attacking at multiple disparate points, you can cut up the Home Defense network and then destroy the pieces. Much like what the Finns did to the Soviets in the Winter War.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

1945 May 29

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:
Kumamoto

Imperial Naval Bombardments


Allied Naval Bombardments:
Allied Ships Bombarding Kumamoto
Allied Ships Bombarding Kumamoto
Allied Ships Bombarding Kumamoto


Our subs are conducting secret activities.

China west.

Image
Attachments
19450530ChinaW.jpg
19450530ChinaW.jpg (22.22 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

China Outback.

Image
Attachments
19450530..Outback.jpg
19450530..Outback.jpg (363.05 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

China east. We have almost 6,600 AV in Shanghai now and probably about 3,000 more on the way. I've decided to order the first attack for tomorrow because we are already over stacked. This way we can simply pull out mauled units to recover and alleviate over stacking at the same time. The attack will receive only current air support: no additional squadrons or naval bombardments for tomorrow.

Image
Attachments
19450530ChinaE.jpg
19450530ChinaE.jpg (41.33 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

China frontier.

Image
Attachments
19450530..Frontier.jpg
19450530..Frontier.jpg (262.49 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Philippines.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Manila (79,77)

Allied Bombardment attack

Attacking force 1503 troops, 151 guns, 84 vehicles, Assault Value = 2269

Defending force 52559 troops, 364 guns, 174 vehicles, Assault Value = 1133

Japanese ground losses:
27 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled

Assaulting units:
30th Australian Brigade
1st Regiment
2nd Regiment
24th (Sep) Infantry Regiment
7th Indian Division
15th NZ Brigade
11th NZ Brigade
3rd Commando Brigade
Fiji Brigade
81st (West African) Division
147th(Sep) Infantry Regiment
NG Vol Rifles Battalion
31st Infantry Regiment
8th NZ Brigade
158th(Sep) Infantry Regiment
14th NZ Brigade
50th Indian Para Brigade
131st Field Artillery Battalion
260th Field Artillery Battalion
134th Field Artillery Battalion
462nd Airborn Field Artillery Battalion
Eighth US Army
205th Field Artillery Battalion
147th Field Artillery Battalion
148th Field Artillery Battalion
I US Corps
2nd RAA Jungle Regiment

Defending units:
102nd Infantry Regiment
79th Brigade
66th Infantry Regiment
77th Infantry Brigade
1st Ind.Mixed Regiment
18th Tank Regiment
19th Naval Guard Unit
I./4th Infantry Battalion
39th/A Division
6th Division
13th Ind.Mixed Regiment
39th/B Division
48th Field AA Battalion
30th JNAF AF Unit
9th RF Gun Battalion
39th Field Const Co
14th Naval Construction Battalion
41st Army
2nd South Seas Det.
107th Ship Eng Coy
207th Ship Eng Coy
53rd Infantry Brigade
2nd Army
7th Ship Engineer Regiment
2nd Field Artillery Regiment
48th Field Artillery Regiment
14th Area Army
9th Ind.Hvy.Art. Battalion
180th JAAF AF Bn


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image
Attachments
19450530..lippines.jpg
19450530..lippines.jpg (410.93 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Home Islands west. Heavy attacks against support of our beachhead continued and yielded another night torpedo hit and a day kamikaze hit. There were also surface attacks by different types of small combatants and one by a destroyer. There was also a sub attack. The naval bombardments again were undaunted and had punishing effects. Our ground attack went well but was bloody, more so for us.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ground combat at Kumamoto (102,59)

Allied Deliberate attack

Attacking force 56416 troops, 1143 guns, 1768 vehicles, Assault Value = 2138

Defending force 60020 troops, 642 guns, 1614 vehicles, Assault Value = 2254

Allied adjusted assault: 2048

Japanese adjusted defense: 1978

Allied assault odds: 1 to 1 (fort level 4)

Allied Assault reduces fortifications to 3

Combat modifiers
Defender: disruption(-), experience(-)
Attacker:

Japanese ground losses:
2212 casualties reported
Squads: 5 destroyed, 77 disabled
Non Combat: 12 destroyed, 105 disabled
Engineers: 6 destroyed, 17 disabled
Guns lost 54 (31 destroyed, 23 disabled)
Vehicles lost 385 (141 destroyed, 244 disabled)

Allied ground losses:
2346 casualties reported
Squads: 11 destroyed, 298 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 136 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 21 disabled
Guns lost 76 (5 destroyed, 71 disabled)
Vehicles lost 385 (61 destroyed, 324 disabled)

Assaulting units:
710th Tank Battalion
24th Infantry Division
193rd Tank Battalion
670th Tank Destroyer Battalion
716th Tank Battalion
754th Tank Battalion
6th Infantry Division
1st USMC Tank Battalion
41st Infantry Division
766th Tank Battalion
194th Tank Battalion
2nd USMC Tank Battalion
5th Marine Division
767th Tank Battalion
82nd Mortar Battalion
4th USMC Field Artillery Battalion
7th USMC Field Artillery Battalion
223rd Field Artillery Battalion
10th USMC Field Artillery Battalion
2nd USMC Field Artillery Battalion
226th Field Artillery Battalion
1st USMC Field Artillery Battalion
XIV US Corps
Sixth US Army
11th USMC Field Artillery Battalion

Defending units:
1st Ind.Tank Brigade
1st Tank Regiment
37th Ind Engineer Regiment
107th Ind.Mixed Brigade
1st Ind.Tank Co
146th Division
156th Division
5th Tank Regiment
48th Tank Regiment
1st Mobile Infantry Regiment
10th Tank Regiment
19th Tank Regiment
4th Tank Division
6th Tank Regiment
212th Division
80th Infantry Brigade
9th Tank Regiment
126th Ind.Mixed Brigade
206th Division
109th Ind.Mixed Brigade
312th Division
11th Tank Regiment
22nd Tank Regiment
13th Tank Regiment
46th Division
98th Ind.Mixed Brigade
14th Tank Regiment
15th Tank Regiment
49th Tank Battalion
100th Ind.Hvy.Art Battalion
64th Field AA Battalion
14th RF Gun (Pack) Battalion
20th AA Regiment
Tachibana-wan Fortress
44th IMB Artillery Battalion
22nd Ind.AA Gun Co
80th Field AA Battalion
Waifu JAAF Base Force


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have 1,731 AV at Kumamoto after the attack. Our ground troops have been safe from air attack and punishing any attempts at artillery bombardment and so should recover quickly. The Imperials are hit night and day and should remain hurt. Now compare the Imperial AV to that of yesterday, and compare the units present! I would say that while the Empire's reinforcement efforts certainly shored up the defenses and will delay us, they have not stopped that invasion. Several dive bomber groups have been moved up to start dropping 1,000 pound bombs from 5,000 ft and others are staging their way in. Also moving up a number of land based TB squadrons to add the weight of their 500 pound bombs. When the next attack is ready we will also bring in as many of the P-51B and P-38 ground attack assigned squadrons as nearby airbases can support.

Image
Attachments
19450530HIW.jpg
19450530HIW.jpg (422.08 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Home Islands east.

Image
Attachments
19450530HIE.jpg
19450530HIE.jpg (374.26 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Air losses. A number of kamikaze and likely conventional strikes were almost entirely warded off in spite of many having good escort.

Image
Attachments
19450530..rLosses.jpg
19450530..rLosses.jpg (292.34 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

Imperial units at Kumamoto yesterday (left) and today (right), sorted and spaced to highlight newly arrived units. The amount of armour that the Empire rushed in is particularly noteworthy. Recon of Kumamoto shows 38 units of 72,720 troops with 668 guns and 1,568 AFV.

Image
Attachments
19450530Kumamoto.jpg
19450530Kumamoto.jpg (305.67 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

The complete combat report, for combat junkies.
Attachments
combatreport.txt
(97.36 KiB) Downloaded 12 times
User avatar
RangerJoe
Posts: 19522
Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2015 2:39 pm
Location: Who knows?

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by RangerJoe »

A very good job at pulling in and mauling his reinforcements! You are doing a good job of killing his tanks.

This should make it easier for the next invasion.

Your air and ground crews deserve a for their work.
Seek peace but keep your gun handy.

I'm not a complete idiot, some parts are missing! :o

“Illegitemus non carborundum est (“Don’t let the bastards grind you down”).”
:twisted: ; Julia Child


Image
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

I am hoping the vehicle casualties for the Empire are all tanks since I suspect they have little motorized support such as the Allies have. I suppose the next attack will tell us more.
jwolf
Posts: 2493
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 4:02 pm

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by jwolf »

The Japanese still have Nates? Aren't they already out of date when the war starts?
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 29

Post by witpqs »

ORIGINAL: jwolf

The Japanese still have Nates? Aren't they already out of date when the war starts?
Maybe just using what is in the pools for kamikazes??
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

1945 May 30

Post by witpqs »

1945 May 30

The Empire captured:


The Allies captured:


There were Imperial amphibious or airborne operations at:


There were Allied amphibious or airborne operations at:
Kumamoto

Imperial Naval Bombardments


Allied Naval Bombardments:
Allied Ships Bombarding Kumamoto


Our subs are conducting secret activities.

China west.

Image
Attachments
19450531ChinaW.jpg
19450531ChinaW.jpg (15.53 KiB) Viewed 341 times
User avatar
witpqs
Posts: 26376
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:48 pm
Location: Argleton

RE: 1945 May 30

Post by witpqs »

China Outback.

Image
Attachments
19450531..Outback.jpg
19450531..Outback.jpg (351.3 KiB) Viewed 341 times
Post Reply

Return to “After Action Reports”