Not to mention the destruction of all the Plane factories.
What a delicious target.[;)]

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition

Debating about west of LA landings...ORIGINAL: Lowpe
First blush at the West Coast planning. I have identified 11 Divisions to attack with. Some are free now; others will be free in a week; others in about two months.
The engineering and aviation support will be a struggle. I have currently 9 AKVs and I was thinking of primarily transporting in all fighter squadrons.
The goal is to sack and burn San Diego and then pretty much leave.
I need to calculate out shipping...I figure it will take almost 100% of Japanese shipping to pull this off. In fact, this is my next task -- to examine my shipping capacity.
![]()
Pretty sure that won't happen as allies have no production per se .... but I have never actually tried that, so it will be interesting to say the least.ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I am not sure how it works on the Allied side of things, but here is a list of CVE that spawn at San Diego.


And exiting from San Diego?ORIGINAL: Lowpe
Debating about west of LA landings...
ORIGINAL: witpqs
If you land there, would you ever get to San Diego?
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I am not sure how it works on the Allied side of things, but here is a list of CVE that spawn at San Diego. If this were Japan, they would be destroyed and VP awarded for their destruction.
Not to mention the destruction of all the Plane factories.
What a delicious target.[;)]
![]()
ORIGINAL: Crackaces
... EDIT: From the archives: (I put Pearl Harbor in RED Because I have no clue what happends if this base is occupied by JJ ...
From Bullwinkle: tm.asp?m=2620232&mpage=1&key=line%2Cdea ... forcements?
Post #1 (Edited)
.............................................
VMD-1 arrives at San Diego
VMD-2 arrives at San Diego
VMF-123 arrives at San Diego
VMF-124 arrives at San Diego
VMSB-143 arrives at San Diego
VMSB-144 arrives at San Diego
VMO-151 arrives at Eastern USA
VMF-213 arrives at Pearl Harbor
VMF-214 arrives at Pearl Harbor
VMF-223 arrives at Pearl Harbor
VMF-224 arrives at Pearl Harbor
VMSB-233 arrives at Pearl Harbor
VMSB-234 arrives at Pearl Harbor
...
[/center]ORIGINAL: Crackaces
I do believe That will activate all the troops that were intended for the Torch Operation? If so .. and this game continues .. I personally would find a way to get these units into India .. the extra Armor would be devastating IMHO ..
ORIGINAL: Alfred
There is a lot more than the above to take into account before settling on the final destination.
Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
First blush at the West Coast planning. I have identified 11 Divisions to attack with. Some are free now; others will be free in a week; others in about two months.
The engineering and aviation support will be a struggle. I have currently 9 AKVs and I was thinking of primarily transporting in all fighter squadrons.
The goal is to sack and burn San Diego and then pretty much leave.
I need to calculate out shipping...I figure it will take almost 100% of Japanese shipping to pull this off. In fact, this is my next task -- to examine my shipping capacity.
![]()
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
I am not sure how it works on the Allied side of things, but here is a list of CVE that spawn at San Diego. If this were Japan, they would be destroyed and VP awarded for their destruction.
Not to mention the destruction of all the Plane factories.
What a delicious target.[;)]
![]()

ORIGINAL: Olorin
My 2 cents.
I was planning to bring every available para unit, I don't know if Lowpe plans to do that. Cutting the rail connection around LA is crucial. Paras plus a minor divisional size invasion north of LA can seriously delay Allied countermeassures. If you really want to go nuts, you can also cut the rail connection from the eastern USA. I don't have the map in front of me right now, but I think those islands off the coast of San Diego can be used for long range air drops. It's unlikely that those rear bases are defended by anything more than base forces. Having one or two 'airmobile' light brigades as a follow up might also be worthwhile.
Also... if the invasion is set for late December, it's worthwhile to consider going all in, not just with 11 but with ~20 divisions. Then you can enter LA and defend in heavy urban and mountain terrain, while the bulk of your forces mop up SD. And if your holding operations N and NE of LA have succeeded you might also have time for a coup de main at LA.
It will be very interesting to see how you approach this.
![]()
Also... if the invasion is set for late December, it's worthwhile to consider going all in, not just with 11 but with ~20 divisions. Then you can enter LA and defend in heavy urban and mountain terrain, while the bulk of your forces mop up SD. And if your holding operations N and NE of LA have succeeded you might also have time for a coup de main at LA.
He will react somehow, and how will partly depend on what is landed. A feint will probably not get him to, say, abandon San Francisco and leave it for the taking. But a big landing will bring a big response and those rail lines will make it easier for him to put things in your way.ORIGINAL: Crackaces
ORIGINAL: witpqs
If you land there, would you ever get to San Diego?
You are alluding to the fact that every restricted unit would rail to San Diego? I am also supposing that the units for the US suddenly appear where ? I have never explored this possiblity?
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: Olorin
My 2 cents.
I was planning to bring every available para unit, I don't know if Lowpe plans to do that. Cutting the rail connection around LA is crucial. Paras plus a minor divisional size invasion north of LA can seriously delay Allied countermeassures. If you really want to go nuts, you can also cut the rail connection from the eastern USA. I don't have the map in front of me right now, but I think those islands off the coast of San Diego can be used for long range air drops. It's unlikely that those rear bases are defended by anything more than base forces. Having one or two 'airmobile' light brigades as a follow up might also be worthwhile.
Also... if the invasion is set for late December, it's worthwhile to consider going all in, not just with 11 but with ~20 divisions. Then you can enter LA and defend in heavy urban and mountain terrain, while the bulk of your forces mop up SD. And if your holding operations N and NE of LA have succeeded you might also have time for a coup de main at LA.
It will be very interesting to see how you approach this.
![]()
The trouble with taking the offshore islands first for later paradrops to cut the rail is that the time needed to get a working AF for the transports would clue him in to the need to defend the area. Basically, by the time you're able to cut the rails deeper inland it won't matter much, if at all.
Landing outside of LA should cut the rail to San Diego entirely. I think this is a must-land hex if you're going for San Diego. I think you should also land at Port Hueneme or Santa Barbara to cut the most direct rail line to LA, but there are is the other line that comes from inland instead of the coast. You may not be able to take those hexes, so I don't think you can rely on the idea that LA can be cut off completely from rail.
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Also... if the invasion is set for late December, it's worthwhile to consider going all in, not just with 11 but with ~20 divisions. Then you can enter LA and defend in heavy urban and mountain terrain, while the bulk of your forces mop up SD. And if your holding operations N and NE of LA have succeeded you might also have time for a coup de main at LA.
It's an impressive idea -- but does Japan have the shipping capacity? It sounds like seven or eight divisions might be lost for not much additional damage.
