______________________________________________________________________________

Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition


ORIGINAL: JocMeister
PS. What the hell is a release from? [&:]
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
He's going to need the Soerbaja and Borneo fuel more or less just to operate out to Hawaii and to the WC if/when. Hawaii really bends the Japanese economy in 1942 at best, and breaks it at worst. Make him run around as much as you can. Subs aren't free fuel-wise either, although a lot players act as if they are. If he tried an India or an Oz I'd be surprised. Hawaii is his big, ahistorical push and it's accomplished. Now it has to be digested.
Perth should be used to the Nth degree with this distribution of forces. Build Kalgoorlie and the port bases to the south of Perth as bulwarks against invasion. But shove a lot in through OZ. You can afford to do it without escorts if you choose your landfalls well. If you don't have to pause to refuel short-legged escorts you can get very good throughput from CT. If he raids you lose a few xAKs. You get over 2000.
ORIGINAL: Bullwinkle58
ORIGINAL: JocMeister
PS. What the hell is a release from? [&:]
A release signed by the sheep of course. To be clearer: "a signed release form from" [:'(]

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
In the interest of full disclosure, and now that there's another AAR up that I'll be reading, I'm sure... I should mention that I also had a look at the IJ side of the save file and was consulted (does this mean I was/am Lowpe's agent?). I provided only comments on the IJ OOB and such (it helps that I couldn't even remember what was going on in this thread anyway [;)]). I figured it was alright since Lowpe's been around in this AAR since the beginning as it is. It was interesting to see what Olorin had going on, and the specifics of the scenario you're using. It also taught me how to actually install a pwhex file, finally.
Now that there are 2 AARs I'll be following, you may see me comment in both at times. They'll just be meta-type posts ("Be aware that even trading 1:2 in VPs, in high enough numbers, can stave off Japanese AV", etc.) on mechanics, strategic concerns with a proposed course of action, potential consequences, etc.
Not just your landfalls, but your waypoints... it's easy enough to raid with SCTFs, CVEs, and subs along the automatic routes between CT and Perth/Melbourne. Add those Waypoints, and change them up from time to time. He could get a radio intel hit on your route at any time and you wouldn't necessarily notice, even if you were watching the DLs on all of your TFs all of the time.

[/center]ORIGINAL: ny59giants
As you know, its not until May when you start the steady flow of SeaBees does your construction engineer problem start to decrease. You have a few Constr Rgt, but not enough. For Christmas '42, you get those nice big SeaBee Rgt to use with over 200 engineers (engineers plus vehicles). In just over 6 months you go from famine to feast in this one area. [&o]

Submarine attack near Batu Pahat at 49,82
Japanese Ships
TK Kaijo Maru, Shell hits 1, Torpedo hits 1, heavy fires, heavy damage
Allied Ships
SS KXVIII, on fire









Night Time Surface Combat, near Kodiak at 181,42, Range 2,000 Yards
Japanese Ships
CL Yura
DD Tokitsukaze
DD Murasame
Allied Ships
YP-72, Shell hits 15, and is sunk
YP-73, Shell hits 4, and is sunk
YP-74, Shell hits 8, and is sunk
YP-92, Shell hits 26, and is sunk
Night Naval bombardment of Ambon at 76,109 - Coastal Guns Fire Back!
6 Coastal gun shots fired in defense.
Japanese Ships
BB Mutsu
BB Nagato
Allied ground losses:
45 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 3 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Morning Air attack on Ambon Defenses , at 76,109 (Ambon)
Weather in hex: Light rain
Raid spotted at 18 NM, estimated altitude 9,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 6 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
G3M2 Nell x 19
G4M1 Betty x 19
Japanese aircraft losses
G3M2 Nell: 1 damaged
Allied ground losses:
6 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Ground combat at Ambon (76,109)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 5389 troops, 29 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 207
Defending force 2501 troops, 30 guns, 4 vehicles, Assault Value = 70
Japanese adjusted assault: 104
Allied adjusted defense: 34
Japanese assault odds: 3 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Ambon !!!
Allied aircraft
no flights
Allied aircraft losses
PBY-5 Catalina: 1 destroyed
Hudson I: 1 destroyed
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(-), fatigue(-), morale(-)
experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
121 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 12 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
2801 casualties reported
Squads: 90 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 131 destroyed, 0 disabled
Engineers: 3 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 42 (42 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (4 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units destroyed 3
Assaulting units:
I./4th Infantry Battalion
4th Engineer Co
15th Naval Guard Unit
III./4th Infantry Battalion
16th Nav Gd /4
23rd AA Regiment
23rd JAAF AF Bn
Defending units:
Molukken Garrison Battalion
Ambon Defenses
Ambon Base Force
Ground combat at Lashio (62,46)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 23681 troops, 205 guns, 64 vehicles, Assault Value = 767
Defending force 6936 troops, 49 guns, 4 vehicles, Assault Value = 222
Japanese adjusted assault: 626
Allied adjusted defense: 52
Japanese assault odds: 12 to 1 (fort level 1)
Japanese forces CAPTURE Lashio !!!
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
541 casualties reported
Squads: 3 destroyed, 40 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 2 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Allied ground losses:
2882 casualties reported
Squads: 134 destroyed, 25 disabled
Non Combat: 105 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 15 destroyed, 0 disabled
Guns lost 11 (6 destroyed, 5 disabled)
Vehicles lost 5 (5 destroyed, 0 disabled)
Units retreated 4
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
Imperial Guards Division
III./143rd Infantry Battalion
55th Engineer Regiment
II./143rd Infantry Battalion
112th Infantry Regiment
2nd RTA/B Division
15th Army
55th Mountain Gun Regiment
21st Medium Field Artillery Battalion
Defending units:
1st Gloucestershire Battalion
BFF Brigade
6th Chinese Corps
102nd RAF Base Force


Ground combat at 83,45 (near Nanyang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 38314 troops, 374 guns, 88 vehicles, Assault Value = 1155
Defending force 43636 troops, 249 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 1019
Japanese adjusted assault: 438
Allied adjusted defense: 1426
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 3
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
1808 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 208 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 32 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 15 disabled
Guns lost 20 (1 destroyed, 19 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
499 casualties reported
Squads: 16 destroyed, 52 disabled
Non Combat: 4 destroyed, 19 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Guns lost 15 (2 destroyed, 13 disabled)
Assaulting units:
3rd Division
34th/C Division
15th Tank Regiment
6th Division
40th/A Division
14th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
1st Army
52nd Ind.Mtn.Gun Battalion
6th Medium Field Artillery Regiment
Defending units:
55th Chinese Corps
92nd Chinese Corps
59th Chinese Corps
66th Chinese Corps
22nd Group Army


ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
Try some variety in the Warships. Cruisers are a good go-to, but others are fun too! Sneaky DDs, sneaky...


ORIGINAL: JocMeister
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna
Try some variety in the Warships. Cruisers are a good go-to, but others are fun too! Sneaky DDs, sneaky...
I´m playing IJN DDs too. [:)] Its actually more fun the then CAs. Averaging 45k damage in my Minikaze. I might actually drop the CAs or go back to playing my Omaha. With the Pepsi I´m usually ending up in T8-T10. At those tiers it seem the norm is to sail 20k from eachother and shot until time runs out... [8|]
Its a shame because I´m getting quite fond of my Pepsi after initially hating it. Didn´t like the Cleveland on bit btw...

