AE Naval and OOB Issues [OUTDATED]
Moderators: wdolson, MOD_War-in-the-Pacific-Admirals-Edition
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Im curious why in AE the top speed of many ships is reduced in compared to
Witp and available data. A few examples
AE Witp
cl. Shiratsuyu 32 34
cl. Akitsuki 32 33
cl. Fubuki 33 38
Witp and available data. A few examples
AE Witp
cl. Shiratsuyu 32 34
cl. Akitsuki 32 33
cl. Fubuki 33 38
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
ORIGINAL: Roko
Im curious why in AE the top speed of many ships is reduced in compared to
Witp and available data. A few examples
AE Witp
cl. Shiratsuyu 32 34
cl. Akitsuki 32 33
cl. Fubuki 33 38
Trials speed was often inflated. Top speed should be operational top speed.
Harry Erwin
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
"For a number to make sense in the game, someone has to calibrate it and program code. There are too many significant numbers that behave non-linearly to expect that. It's just a game. Enjoy it." herwin@btinternet.com
-
Buck Beach
- Posts: 1974
- Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2000 8:00 am
- Location: Upland,CA,USA
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
For the fuel starved Allied AI players (at the war's inception) I offer this link for consideration:
http://merchantships2.tripod.com/ian/ia ... page1.html
Here are a few Tankers that may be available:
S.S. Albertolite
H.M. Storey (sunk in 1943) H.M. Storey II is in the game with a 10/18/43 arrive date.
S.S. Idaho (game has the BB and a cargo vessel by this name) another link showing it as a tanker http://www.militarymuseum.org/Montebello.html)
S.S. Connecticut
Within this history is a couple additional Cargo ships which may not be listed in the game.
Fort Camosun (Canadian)
M.V. Kookaburra (Swedish)
If posts such as this should be posted in the general threads, let me know.
http://merchantships2.tripod.com/ian/ia ... page1.html
Here are a few Tankers that may be available:
S.S. Albertolite
H.M. Storey (sunk in 1943) H.M. Storey II is in the game with a 10/18/43 arrive date.
S.S. Idaho (game has the BB and a cargo vessel by this name) another link showing it as a tanker http://www.militarymuseum.org/Montebello.html)
S.S. Connecticut
Within this history is a couple additional Cargo ships which may not be listed in the game.
Fort Camosun (Canadian)
M.V. Kookaburra (Swedish)
If posts such as this should be posted in the general threads, let me know.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me
Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !!
http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !!
http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
- Chickenboy
- Posts: 24648
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?
I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere. I didn't see it. I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.
Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942. I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes. Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja). I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.
One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply. None are damaged. I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.
The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows. While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii. This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission. It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!). Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc. Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.
Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments? I know that I never gave any such orders. I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help. This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.
Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942. I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes. Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja). I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.
One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply. None are damaged. I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.
The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows. While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii. This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission. It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!). Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc. Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.
Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments? I know that I never gave any such orders. I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help. This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.

RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?
Could be...i had a fragment of AVG in a Chinese base with nowhere to get to the parent. The fragment eventually show up at the parent and recombines. [8|]ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere. I didn't see it. I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.
Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942. I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes. Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja). I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.
One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply. None are damaged. I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.
The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows. While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii. This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission. It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!). Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc. Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.
Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments? I know that I never gave any such orders. I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help. This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Lucky for you, tonight it's just me
Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !!
http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
Any ship can be a minesweeper..once !!
http://suspenseandmystery.blogspot.com/
RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?
Me too. I can't get get planes out of ready state. And theres always some little number, like 1 or 2 that makes it impossible to to figure out what can go onto a CV. I cant do what I'm trying to do from the manual. Whats goning on please.ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere. I didn't see it. I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.
Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942. I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes. Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja). I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.
One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply. None are damaged. I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.
The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows. While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii. This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission. It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!). Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc. Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.
Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments? I know that I never gave any such orders. I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help. This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
ORIGINAL: scott1964
Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]
There is no respawn at all in AE. You get all the carriers that showed up. The four that were named after sunk carriers are instead called Lexington II, Yorktown II, Wasp II, Hornet II.
Lose fewer, have more!
Intel Monkey: https://sites.google.com/view/staffmonkeys/home
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
ORIGINAL: witpqs
Lose fewer, have more!ORIGINAL: scott1964
Does CV Enterprise respawn if sunk? I lost her and has not shown up as being available..yet. [:)]
Or lose more, have fewer....either way...[:D]
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture

"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
- Chickenboy
- Posts: 24648
- Joined: Fri Jun 28, 2002 11:30 pm
- Location: San Antonio, TX
RE: Transport TF to pick up A/C fragment?
I'm giving this a little bump. Thanks for the comments re: the fragment, but that's not really what I'm concerned about. I'm more concerned re: the automatic transport TF on the suicide run. Once upon a time in UV, my submarines would automatically leave port on their own with no rhyme or reason (a known and subsequently fixed bug). This seems passingly familiar.ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
I went through the first 5 pages of this thead to see if this was addressed elsewhere. I didn't see it. I also didn't see it on the entire list of the first patch issue fixes so, I've done some due diligence before posting here.
Playing allied vs. Jap AI (v. hard), mid-February 1942. I lost the Lexington in an exchange for Soryu and damage to Zuikaku in the DEI Southwest of The Celebes. Planes from the Lex diverted to nearest landmass (base on SW Celebes corner nearest Soerbaja). I eventually transfered them over to Java (Soerbaja) where they reside.
One of the DB units from the Lexington is sitting at 1 ready A/C 15 reserve, although there's more than sufficient pilots, aviation support and supply. None are damaged. I can't get the planes out of ready state into action.
The weird thing (the purpose of this post) follows. While working out a turn, I noticed a TF between Midway Is. and Hawaii. This TF consisted of one ship that was on a "Transport" mission. It originated from SF and was tasked with picking up the DB fragment in Java (!). Of course the route that it was going to take went right past Saipan and Guam, through the captured DEI / PI bases, etc. Naturally, it would have been sunk had I not noticed it.
Is the computer creating odd TFs like this to pick up A/C fragments? I know that I never gave any such orders. I'd be happy to post a save to someone if it would help. This sounds and looks 'buggy' to me.
Edited to add: I have not yet patched-playing stock AE.

RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
ORIGINAL: Barb
Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]
Not quite
From the above link.
3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:
LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.
10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)
Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.
The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.
So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
This is getting wierd. This is the sixth or seventh different one of these out there.ORIGINAL: JeffK
ORIGINAL: Barb
Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]
Not quite
From the above link.
3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:
LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.
10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)
Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.
The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.
So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
Can somebody please do this in UTC.
- Chad Harrison
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
- Location: Boise, ID - USA
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Hi all,
As I continue to work through my first turn I noticed something that seemed odd. This is an unmodified Scenario One that I am running.
When I go to the USAFFE HQ and click 'Show ships of this HQ' it correctly shows all my assigned USAFFE ships, but it also shows all the Asiatic Fleet ships. I just experimented by assigning ships to the Third US Fleet, and sure enough, they show up when I have Pacific Fleet 'Show ships of this HQ'. Also, if you click on say a ship assigned to USAFFE and click in the ship detail screen Show all ships of USAFFE, it will also show those of its subordinate command (Asiatic Fleet in this case). But if you access a ship in the subordinate command, it does *not* show the ships in the parent command. All that being said, I am not sure if this is WAD.
In other words, is it *intended* that a parent HQ shows both its ships and its subordiante command ships? Examples available at the start of the game would be the two above. Later in the game, you could see this with any number of commands. This does not appear to be a bug with my save, but the way it currently always is.
Again, this may be WAD, but it seems bass ackwards to me. It would make assigned ships to the subordiante command kind of pointless because you would always be seeing them when you accessed the ships in the parent command. Its just annoying for me because I heavily use the new ship command system and consider this one of the best improvements of AE over vanilla WitP.
Not a huge issue, but just one of those things.
Thanks in advance!
Chad
As I continue to work through my first turn I noticed something that seemed odd. This is an unmodified Scenario One that I am running.
When I go to the USAFFE HQ and click 'Show ships of this HQ' it correctly shows all my assigned USAFFE ships, but it also shows all the Asiatic Fleet ships. I just experimented by assigning ships to the Third US Fleet, and sure enough, they show up when I have Pacific Fleet 'Show ships of this HQ'. Also, if you click on say a ship assigned to USAFFE and click in the ship detail screen Show all ships of USAFFE, it will also show those of its subordinate command (Asiatic Fleet in this case). But if you access a ship in the subordinate command, it does *not* show the ships in the parent command. All that being said, I am not sure if this is WAD.
In other words, is it *intended* that a parent HQ shows both its ships and its subordiante command ships? Examples available at the start of the game would be the two above. Later in the game, you could see this with any number of commands. This does not appear to be a bug with my save, but the way it currently always is.
Again, this may be WAD, but it seems bass ackwards to me. It would make assigned ships to the subordiante command kind of pointless because you would always be seeing them when you accessed the ships in the parent command. Its just annoying for me because I heavily use the new ship command system and consider this one of the best improvements of AE over vanilla WitP.
Not a huge issue, but just one of those things.
Thanks in advance!
Chad
- Chad Harrison
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
- Location: Boise, ID - USA
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Just as a follow up, I just tried it with the Japanese and it does the same thing. In other words, at the start of scenario 1, Southern Army has no ships assigned. But if I go to the Southern Command HQ, and click 'Show ships of this HQ', it will show the ships of all of its subordinate fleets - such as Combined Fleet.
Again, this may be WAD. I dont think it is, as it makes having ships assigned to the parent fleet pointless once you start using the subordiante fleets because you will be seeing multiple commands in the parent fleet OOB.
Just curious if this is WAD.
Thanks in advance!
Chad
Again, this may be WAD. I dont think it is, as it makes having ships assigned to the parent fleet pointless once you start using the subordiante fleets because you will be seeing multiple commands in the parent fleet OOB.
Just curious if this is WAD.
Thanks in advance!
Chad
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work.
- Chad Harrison
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2003 9:07 pm
- Location: Boise, ID - USA
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
ORIGINAL: Don Bowen
Yes, that is the way it is supposed to work.
As always, thanks for the reply Don. Just wanted to make sure it wasnt user error [:D]
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Later Yubari class (ID #1013 and #1014) has armour for device slot 4, Type 2 DC (#1700).
I assume this was a mistake left over from the device change during upgrade from the 12/41 class.
I assume this was a mistake left over from the device change during upgrade from the 12/41 class.
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Problem is that the file looks OK before posting, and if I go to edit it it looks OK[:(]ORIGINAL: Whisper
This is getting wierd. This is the sixth or seventh different one of these out there.ORIGINAL: JeffK
ORIGINAL: Barb
Well, because of time zones 8th dec 41 in malaya was actually the same day as 7th dec 41 in pearl harbor [:D]
Not quite
From the above link.
3. The timing of initial Japanese attacks was as follows:
LOCAL TIME ZONE G.M.T ATTACK
0025/8 -7½ 1655/7 Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya).
0800/7 +10½ 1830/7 Air attack on Pearl Harbour.
0400/8 -7½ 2130/7 Air raid on Singapore.
0510/8 -8 2110/7 Air raid on Davao, Philippines.
0800/8 -8½ 2330/7 Air raid on Hongkong.
0900/8 -8½ 0030/8 Air raid on Hongkong (Kaitek) airfield; Japanese troops crossed frontier into New Territory.
10. MOVEMENTS OF FORCE "Z", 8TH-1OTH DECEMBER, 1941. (Plan 2)
Having formed his design, Admiral Phillips sailed from Singapore at 1735, 8th December. Just prior to sailing he was informed that it was doubtful if the fighter protection off Singora on 10th December could be provided.
The squadron, known as Force "Z", consisted of the Prince of Wales (flag), Repulse and the destroyers Electra, Express, Vampire and Tenedos.2 Course was shaped to the E.N.E. to pass east of the Anamba Islands in order to avoid possible minefields.
So Force Z sailed 17 hours after the initial landings, they weren't a hundred miles at sea.
Can somebody please do this in UTC.
Landing Kota Bharu (N. Malaya). GMT 1655/7
Air attack on Pearl Harbour. GMT 1830/7
Air raid on Singapore. GMT 2130/7
Force Z sails from Singapore GMT 1205/8
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
Came across this ship a little while ago and wonder if its the game (can't check now 'cause I'm @ work)?
HMAS Doomba (ex HMS Wexford, a RN Hunt class MSW, commissioned in 1919)
1921: sold to an Aussy shipping company and used as a cruise ship
04/09/39: requisitioned by RAN and rebuilt as a MSW
06/42: re-classified as an ASW ship (or as an AA ship according to Wiki)
03/13/46: decommissioned by RAN
Armament in RAN service: 1x4in, 1x40mm, 1x20mm, 2 ea Vickers & Lewis mgs, 51 depth charges (unknown if DCTs or racks).
Speed was rated @ 16kts
Has a similar, but not exactly the same profile as HMAS Moresby.
Wiki doesn't say much about its service, but considering it was requisitioned by the RAN in Oz, I'm guessing it spent its entire service with the RAN in and/or around Aussy waters.
HMAS Doomba (ex HMS Wexford, a RN Hunt class MSW, commissioned in 1919)
1921: sold to an Aussy shipping company and used as a cruise ship
04/09/39: requisitioned by RAN and rebuilt as a MSW
06/42: re-classified as an ASW ship (or as an AA ship according to Wiki)
03/13/46: decommissioned by RAN
Armament in RAN service: 1x4in, 1x40mm, 1x20mm, 2 ea Vickers & Lewis mgs, 51 depth charges (unknown if DCTs or racks).
Speed was rated @ 16kts
Has a similar, but not exactly the same profile as HMAS Moresby.
Wiki doesn't say much about its service, but considering it was requisitioned by the RAN in Oz, I'm guessing it spent its entire service with the RAN in and/or around Aussy waters.
John E. McCallum
RE: AE Naval and OOB Issues
A picture of HMAS Doomba from The State Library of Victoria
http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictoria/b/4/ ... 0683.shtml
and another
http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/vi ... page_id=60
http://www.slv.vic.gov.au/pictoria/b/4/ ... 0683.shtml
and another
http://www.michaelmcfadyenscuba.info/vi ... page_id=60
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum







