B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

The Duke
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:30 pm
Location: Austin, TX

B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by The Duke »

Just thought I'd share that in my PBEM, 2 or 3 of my fleet carriers were wrecked by B-29s flying out of Darwin, hitting my TF on the north side of Mindanao, Phillipines. 26 Hexes, baby.

1,560 miles each way. Strategic bomber. Gotta love it.
User avatar
Honda
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 5:15 pm
Location: Karlovac, Croatia

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Honda »

So what you're saying is we can hunt hunt them deep within our territory just by having a TF detected[;)]
I feel for you...
User avatar
Oliver Heindorf
Posts: 1911
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 2:49 am
Location: Hamburg/Deutschland

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Oliver Heindorf »

the were testing the worlds first guided AS missle [;)]
User avatar
Mark VII
Posts: 1845
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 6:41 am
Location: Brentwood,TN

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Mark VII »

naaa, just laser guided gravity bombs from 30,000 feet.
Image
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Ron Saueracker »

I won't comment...[8D]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
1275psi
Posts: 7987
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 10:47 pm

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by 1275psi »

I will -absolute crap, demand a replay, any allied player who uses B29 naval strike aint in my book of opponents..................
big seas, fast ships, life tastes better with salt
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by wild_Willie2 »

ORIGINAL: 1275psi

I will -absolute crap, demand a replay, any allied player who uses B29 naval strike aint in my book of opponents..................


Most likely also set the bombers to 100 feet naval attack [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: The Duke

Just thought I'd share that in my PBEM, 2 or 3 of my fleet carriers were wrecked by B-29s flying out of Darwin, hitting my TF on the north side of Mindanao, Phillipines. 26 Hexes, baby.

1,560 miles each way. Strategic bomber. Gotta love it.


Glad I´ve got a house rule on that in my latest PBEM. And hoping that in my other PBEMs that I´ve got going my opponents won´t have the idea to do such things.... [8|][8|]
User avatar
ny59giants
Posts: 9888
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 12:02 pm

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by ny59giants »

The next patch will include a PDU path to upgrade the B-29's to B-52's so you can bomb Japan from Pearl. [:D][:D]
I feel that B-29's being used as Naval Attack is a game breaker. Naval Search is OK.
[center]Image[/center]
SamCole
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:38 pm

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by SamCole »

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

I won't comment...[8D]

This is the most suprising post of the month.
User avatar
Rob Brennan UK
Posts: 3685
Joined: Sat Aug 24, 2002 8:36 pm
Location: London UK

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Rob Brennan UK »

ORIGINAL: ny59giants

The next patch will include a PDU path to upgrade the B-29's to B-52's so you can bomb Japan from Pearl. [:D][:D]
I feel that B-29's being used as Naval Attack is a game breaker. Naval Search is OK.

Ditto ..
sorry for the spelling . English is my main language , I just can't type . and i'm too lazy to edit :)
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: SamCole

ORIGINAL: Ron Saueracker

I won't comment...[8D]

This is the most suprising post of the month.

But in essence I did![:D]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Przemcio231
Posts: 1901
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 9:39 am
Location: Warsaw,Poland,EU:)

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Przemcio231 »

Chris don't worry i will never thought about such a Crap... better move as im totaly exited if my masterplan will work[:D]
Image

Pinky: Hey Brain what are we goeing to do this evening?
Brain: The Usual Pinky we will try to take over the World;)
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by pauk »

i will comment this in traditional manner of Uber Allied fanboys:

"The Duke, just because B-29 weren't used as extremely long range bomber for naval targets, doesn't mean they couldn't be effective"... in other words what you ve just experienced is normal....

[:'(][;)][:D]
Image
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by castor troy »

ORIGINAL: Przemcio231

Chris don't worry i will never thought about such a Crap... better move as im totaly exited if my masterplan will work[:D]


masterplan?? [:D][:D] We´ll see....
ckk
Posts: 1241
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Pensacola Beach FL

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by ckk »

Just curious how many times was the KB detected?
User avatar
dtravel
Posts: 4533
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 6:34 pm

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by dtravel »

I can see it happening.  "Squadron 911, your assignment today is to patrol over the western end of the South China Sea and attack any enemy shipping spotted.  The PBYs and PBMs will be squacking on freq 675.38, so hit anything they report.  Good luck and good hunting."
This game does not have a learning curve. It has a learning cliff.

"Bomb early, bomb often, bomb everything." - Niceguy

Any bugs I report are always straight stock games.

Image
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 2227
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:14 am
Location: Ashington, England.

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Miller »

I can just imagine the look on the Jap sailors faces as the B-29's launch their 20000lb bomb loads at 100 feet[:D]
User avatar
ChezDaJez
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2004 7:08 am
Location: Chehalis, WA

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by ChezDaJez »

Just thought I'd share that in my PBEM, 2 or 3 of my fleet carriers were wrecked by B-29s flying out of Darwin, hitting my TF on the north side of Mindanao, Phillipines. 26 Hexes, baby.

1,560 miles each way. Strategic bomber. Gotta love it.

This highlights another weakness in WitP's tactical routines. It applies to ALL long range tactical aircraft but I'll use Duke's example.

Consider that for a B-29 unit to attack ships at 1560 miles, they would need a minimum of 12 hours to prepare and fly to the target. Figure 2 hours for the sighting report to work its way through the system and get to where someone can make a decision. Then another 3 hours to load the aircraft and brief the crews, take off and form up. Then 7 hours of flight time to the target. During that time the warships (assuming a cruise speed of 20 knots) could move up to 240 miles from the initial point of detection. The yields a theorectical search area of something over 180,000 square miles.

It would take several hours to search that area. Totally unrealistic to expect them to do that free from interception.

BTW, I agree with 1275PSI. Anyone who uses B-29s in a naval attack role won't be included in my list of people to play.

Chez
Ret Navy AWCS (1972-1998)
VP-5, Jacksonville, Fl 1973-78
ASW Ops Center, Rota, Spain 1978-81
VP-40, Mt View, Ca 1981-87
Patrol Wing 10, Mt View, CA 1987-90
ASW Ops Center, Adak, Ak 1990-92
NRD Seattle 1992-96
VP-46, Whidbey Isl, Wa 1996-98
Mike Scholl
Posts: 6187
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2003 1:17 am
Location: Kansas City, MO

RE: B-29 Attack on Carriers from 26 Hexes

Post by Mike Scholl »

ORIGINAL: ChezDaJez
Just thought I'd share that in my PBEM, 2 or 3 of my fleet carriers were wrecked by B-29s flying out of Darwin, hitting my TF on the north side of Mindanao, Phillipines. 26 Hexes, baby.

1,560 miles each way. Strategic bomber. Gotta love it.

This highlights another weakness in WitP's tactical routines. It applies to ALL long range tactical aircraft but I'll use Duke's example.

Consider that for a B-29 unit to attack ships at 1560 miles, they would need a minimum of 12 hours to prepare and fly to the target. Figure 2 hours for the sighting report to work its way through the system and get to where someone can make a decision. Then another 3 hours to load the aircraft and brief the crews, take off and form up. Then 7 hours of flight time to the target. During that time the warships (assuming a cruise speed of 20 knots) could move up to 240 miles from the initial point of detection. The yields a theorectical search area of something over 180,000 square miles.

It would take several hours to search that area. Totally unrealistic to expect them to do that free from interception.

BTW, I agree with 1275PSI. Anyone who uses B-29s in a naval attack role won't be included in my list of people to play.

Chez



B-29's do cruise a bit faster than you are giving them credit for, but otherwise I agree wholeheartedly. I'd put the "Allied Fanboy" who used such tactics in the same boat as the "Japanese Fanboy" who uses loopholes to conquer China in the first 4 months. I know their answer to any complaint is "But the Rules/Game makes it possible!"---but they are both jerks and deserve to be made to play each other for ever. I don't want any part of either one either.....
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”