Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Dive Bomber1
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:59 pm

Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Dive Bomber1 »

I was wondering if any Japanese players have been able to invade the US West Coast, or even Canada during a pbem game? If so, how did it go, and was an AAR posted?

Thanks
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by TulliusDetritus »

There are some lunatics out there [:D]

Anyway, are you talking about a "crazy invasion": "this is indeed a suicide but oh well, let's have some fun"? Or about a successful invasion: "the Allied player is totally KO"?

I don't think someone managed to do that: per manual, lots of divisions will auto-magically appear in the West Coast in case of Die Grosse Invasion. As for a lunatic strategy, I do not read the AAR's. But as I have said, I suspect there must be some lunatics (no offense intended here) [:D]
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
User avatar
wild_Willie2
Posts: 2934
Joined: Fri Oct 08, 2004 10:33 am
Location: Arnhem (holland) yes a bridge to far...

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by wild_Willie2 »

Main problem with invading the US, that, once you conquer a base on the US mainland, the US will get ALL units scheduled to arrive in the next 6 months INSTANTANIOUSLY....
 
And that are A LOT of units/airpower... 
In vinum illic est sapientia , in matera illic est vires , in aqua illic es bacteria.

In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there are bacteria.
User avatar
saj42
Posts: 1132
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Somerset, England

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by saj42 »

I remember seeing a thread or AAR about this back in about November. SF was invaded, and the invaders outnumbered the defenders on the day of landing. As if by magic the reinforcements were brought forward 6 months. All those scheduled to arrive in SF did so - poor Jap player first attack then faced about 10 division equivalents in a city hex. Obviously the attack was a disaster.
The game mechanics work the same for both sides - if US attacks HI.

I've two issues with this :
1. If units arrive early then they should not be at full strength - as they haven't finished forming up and completing basic training (% disabled squads should be higher the further you are from the original arrival date)
2. They should not all appear at e.g. SF (as per the reinforcement schedule) as they would be training at many locations all over the continental US. Only those training in the SF area should appear there - others should arrive at say the United States base (a change to locations in the database?).
Image
Banner by rogueusmc
Cuttlefish
Posts: 2454
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 5:03 am
Location: Oregon, USA

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Cuttlefish »

I thought I remembered reading an AAR where Mogami tried invading the US as the result of a drunken bet. After a bit of looking I found "Beer made me do it": http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=911310&mpage=1&key=
Image
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!
I've two issues with this :
1. If units arrive early then they should not be at full strength - as they haven't finished forming up and completing basic training (% disabled squads should be higher the further you are from the original arrival date)
2. They should not all appear at e.g. SF (as per the reinforcement schedule) as they would be training at many locations all over the continental US. Only those training in the SF area should appear there - others should arrive at say the United States base (a change to locations in the database?).
I think this simulates the idea that if San Francisco is under siege there is no way the US is sending troops to Europe. It's not just the units destined for the Pacific Japan would face, but the entire US Army, Navy and Marines, plus probably Canada.

Invading the US west coast is suicide. It should be...
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Nemo121 »

Canada is doable and, in some circumstances, eminently justifiable. Invading CONUSA is really neither.
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
Dive Bomber1
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:59 pm

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Dive Bomber1 »

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Canada is doable and, in some circumstances, eminently justifiable. Invading CONUSA is really neither.

I just figured that if the Allied player moved all his good units out of the West Coast in early 1942 there wouldn't be much there, even if six month's worth of units showed up.

Thanks to all for the comments and for the link!
User avatar
denisonh
Posts: 2083
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2001 10:00 am
Location: Upstate SC

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by denisonh »

PPs prevent the Allies from doing too much too early in 42. There are some valuable units in the Phillipines and DEI that Allied players can move/evacuate that can be very helpful later on.

I think an Alakan adventure may be far more valuable as the Japs as many Allied players divert North Pacfic forces to other places.
"Life is tough, it's even tougher when you're stupid" -SGT John M. Stryker, USMC
User avatar
pauk
Posts: 4156
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by pauk »

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!

The game mechanics work the same for both sides - if US attacks HI.

I've two issues with this :
1. If units arrive early then they should not be at full strength - as they haven't finished forming up and completing basic training (% disabled squads should be higher the further you are from the original arrival date)
2. They should not all appear at e.g. SF (as per the reinforcement schedule) as they would be training at many locations all over the continental US. Only those training in the SF area should appear there - others should arrive at say the United States base (a change to locations in the database?).

Not true. Japan Militia divisions arrives no earlier than January 45. So, Allied player can invade HI before that date without any fear of activaing HI Militia units.

Few players achived that, most recent is seydliz who done that in March 42 (yes,it is not typo[:)])

Japan militia divisions arrives at 1/4 or 1/3 strength and with awful experience and morale .
Image
User avatar
Charles2222
Posts: 3687
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2001 10:00 am

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Charles2222 »

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005

ORIGINAL: Tallyho!
I've two issues with this :
1. If units arrive early then they should not be at full strength - as they haven't finished forming up and completing basic training (% disabled squads should be higher the further you are from the original arrival date)
2. They should not all appear at e.g. SF (as per the reinforcement schedule) as they would be training at many locations all over the continental US. Only those training in the SF area should appear there - others should arrive at say the United States base (a change to locations in the database?).
I think this simulates the idea that if San Francisco is under siege there is no way the US is sending troops to Europe. It's not just the units destined for the Pacific Japan would face, but the entire US Army, Navy and Marines, plus probably Canada.

Invading the US west coast is suicide. It should be...

Well it depends when the west coast is invaded too. We didn't have any divisions earmarked for europe on 12/7/41, and even though we at some point wanted to send stuff there, any IJ invasion around the first two months surely wouldn't had seen what was sent to NAfrica contesting them. I think the original poster also thinks that the trigger is IJ taking a city, whereas I always thought it was a matter of IJ setting foot on any soil east of a certain line.
Dive Bomber1
Posts: 670
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 10:59 pm

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Dive Bomber1 »

ORIGINAL: denisonh

PPs prevent the Allies from doing too much too early in 42. There are some valuable units in the Phillipines and DEI that Allied players can move/evacuate that can be very helpful later on.

I think an Alakan adventure may be far more valuable as the Japs as many Allied players divert North Pacfic forces to other places.

That's a good point. The Alaskan bases would certainly make it easier for the KB to raid the West Coast ports.

Thanks -
User avatar
Nemo121
Posts: 5838
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:15 am
Contact:

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Nemo121 »

Pauk,
 
Not quite correct. Jagdfluger has invaded Sakhalin at the beginning of February 42 in my PBEM against him [:D]. of course the REAL trick is whether there will be any US troops left alive on Sakhalin in 1 month's time [:D]
John Dillworth: "I had GreyJoy check my spelling and he said it was fine."
Well, that's that settled then.
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: Charles_22
I think the original poster also thinks that the trigger is IJ taking a city, whereas I always thought it was a matter of IJ setting foot on any soil east of a certain line.
I believe that you are correct, though I haven't looked up the rule in a while.

I don't know the US disposition at the start of the war, but certainly the US had several divisions of troops scattered around the CONUS.
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
Big B
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: niceguy2005

ORIGINAL: Charles_22
I think the original poster also thinks that the trigger is IJ taking a city, whereas I always thought it was a matter of IJ setting foot on any soil east of a certain line.
I believe that you are correct, though I haven't looked up the rule in a while.

I don't know the US disposition at the start of the war, but certainly the US had several divisions of troops scattered around the CONUS.

Yes there were plenty of troops in the CONUS at the time. To quote:


On 30 June 1939 the Regular Army numbered 187,893 men, including 22,387 in the Army Air Corps. On the same date the National Guard totaled 199,491 men.
The major combat units included nine infantry divisions, two cavalry divisions, a mechanized cavalry (armor) brigade in the Regular Army and eighteen infantry divisions in the National Guard.

On 16 September 1940 the first peacetime draft in United States history was passed by Congress.

On 7 December 1941 the Army consisted of 1,685,403 men (including 275,889 in the Air Corps) in 29 infantry, five armor, and two cavalry divisions. While this 435 percent increase was a magnificent achievement, shortages of equipment and trained personnel were still serious.


Through 1942 and into early 1943 the Army expanded to 8,291,336 men in 89 divisions: sixty-six infantry, five airborne, sixteen armored, one cavalry, and one mountain infantry.


What arrives in any given 6 months in WitP is peanuts compared to what the US could have thrown to the West Coast in a week.
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7177
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Feinder »

What arrives in any given 6 months in WitP is peanuts compared to what the US could have thrown to the West Coast in a week.

Trains are such a wonderful thing.

:^)

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
qgaliana
Posts: 311
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 7:47 pm

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by qgaliana »

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Canada is doable and, in some circumstances, eminently justifiable. Invading CONUSA is really neither.

If you assume the Japanese were willing to assemble the shipping and forces, I could conceive of a hypothetical (RL) landing succeding anywhere in Canada or the US to the extent it might build a sizeable beachhead, simply because there is too much coast to cover.

But even in the case of a Canadian invasion (most of the army was already in europe), I seriously doubt the US would stand idly by with the Japanese setting up airbases in Canada. Any west coast landing would have been met by everything the US and Canada could have thrown at it. East coast, west coast, recalls from England...

The units just don't exist in the game to properly reflect this.
Big B
Posts: 4633
Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Cali
Contact:

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by Big B »

ORIGINAL: qgaliana

ORIGINAL: Nemo121

Canada is doable and, in some circumstances, eminently justifiable. Invading CONUSA is really neither.

If you assume the Japanese were willing to assemble the shipping and forces, I could conceive of a hypothetical (RL) landing succeding anywhere in Canada or the US to the extent it might build a sizeable beachhead, simply because there is too much coast to cover.

But even in the case of a Canadian invasion (most of the army was already in europe), I seriously doubt the US would stand idly by with the Japanese setting up airbases in Canada. Any west coast landing would have been met by everything the US and Canada could have thrown at it. East coast, west coast, recalls from England...

The units just don't exist in the game to properly reflect this.
And lend-lease would have been a dead subject had the Japanese actaully invaded the West Coast - one of the biggest factors for early US equipment shortages (1941-1942) was lend-lease.
User avatar
niceguy2005
Posts: 12522
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 1:53 pm
Location: Super secret hidden base

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by niceguy2005 »

ORIGINAL: Big B
Through 1942 and into early 1943 the Army expanded to 8,291,336 men in 89 divisions: sixty-six infantry, five airborne, sixteen armored, one cavalry, and one mountain infantry.
I had no idea the US military was that big at the time. Anybody know how big the Japanese or German military was at its height?
Image
Artwork graciously provided by Dixie
User avatar
TulliusDetritus
Posts: 5581
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 1:49 am
Location: The Zone™

RE: Any pbem invasions of the US West Coast?

Post by TulliusDetritus »

NiceGuy, as for Germany, numbers may lie.

This is what I know:

- when the war starts in september 1939:
Army: 2,4 million men => 104 big "units": among them 6 Panzer divisions, 4 Motorised divisions, 4 light divisions and 3 mountain divisions.

- between summer 1940 and spring 1941 the army is reorganised. There are 20 Panzer divisions, 10 Motorised divisions and 185 infantry divisions (on 1940 there were 140 divisions).

BUT after the re-organisation, the Panzer divisions have only between 140 and 190 tanks. Before they had between 180 and 300 tanks. In other words, there are x2 Panzer divisions but with almost half of the tanks.

After Barbarossa, numbers necessarily "lie". The Wehrmacht is massacred in Russia (900,000 deaths only on 1941, a quite "victorious" year). Later during the war there will be a lot of divisions... on the paper. Some only have 1,000 men, others have been annihilated. Also note that a number of this total was almost worthless: good only for security tasks in rear areas.

As for Japan, I don’t know, but for sure their army was inferior to the German or Soviet armies. Japan was a naval power. Either they could afford a powerful navy or army. But not both.
"Hitler is a horrible sexual degenerate, a dangerous fool" - Mussolini, circa 1934
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”