more scenarios?

[marky]

where can i get mooooreee

i must have more, i am bored, bored is not good!

a bored marky is an ANNOYING marky!

[wdolson]

Most of these sites have different scenarios:

http://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=805143

Bill

[marky]

thankyz[:)]

[Captain Torry]

This may not be the place to ask this. I've been playing WPO for about a year now, but just finally got WITP. Are there any scenarios available that include late war naval construction like Montana class BBs, DeMoines class CAs and Midway class CVs? It appears several of the scenarios that come with the game have an ending date of March 1946 and some of these units would have been completed by then, and yes I know the Montana's are never weres but not the others, I've got the ship sides and all, Just need to know if I need to make my own database changes or if someone has already done this. Thanks for any information.

Regards
Captain Rockwell Torry

[wdolson]

CHS includes the Midway.  I believe the Empires Ablaze mod is a "what if" campaign based on the idea that battleship building went crazy.  I believe it includes the Montana, but I'm not sure, I've only heard about it, I've never looked at it.

Bill

[el cid again]

CHS may give you mose of what you wish for here. There are Midways and some late war battleships - not just US. RHS ends sooner - 1 Jan 1946 at the latest with no ships after the end of Sept 1945. Even so, the BBO scenario gives you extra Iowas and the British Lions - and like CHS Richelieu. You get more cruisers and "battlecruisers" - and on both sides in BBO. This variation is the war as it was planned by both sides - probably more likely than the war as it occurred. [The lessons of Pearl Harbor, Coral Sea and Midway might not have been processed in time - particularly if those battles took a different form or occurred on different dates]. EOS gives you two of the Midways - but in the form of Essex hulls so they build faster. EOS gives Japan rather more options - many ships can convert to CV or CVL form - and the US converts additional CVLs from CLs (but for USN that is locked in, as are several other things).

BBO (and its RPO and PPO variations) also lets you experiment with alternate conceptions of US construction for DEs (half as many, twice the horsepower on each, more speed) and submarines (numbers of medium sized boats that arrive sooner that fleet boats - and some of the fleet boats arrive with major gunpower - two twin 5 inch mountings). Similar things on the other side. All these options were contemplated, prototyped, etc. Adm Hart advocated the medium sized submarine concept - but was more or less overruled by the head of naval construction - who ruled it could only be done in yards that could not build bigger boats. Any yard that can build a submarine could build either size.

[Dali]

This super works !!