Airfields

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

histgamer
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:28 am

Airfields

Post by histgamer »

Whats the best way to destroy planes on the ground? Level bombing as japan dosnt seem to be very effective is it better to send carrier airplanes at say 2000 feet or what?
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Airfields

Post by Terminus »

Japan isn't really able to inflict a lot of damage from the air; their aircraft don't carry big enough loads of heavy enough bombs. As for "carrier airplanes at 2000 feet", that's too low; they'll get hammered by AA, and dive bombing always takes place at 2000 feet anyway.

As the Japs, I rely on pinning instead of destroying. If the airfield in question is in a territory I want to invade, I only have to pin down the airplanes long enough to get ground troops there. In fact, I want as little damage to the airfield as possible, because I'll need it myself.

Overall, the number of aircraft that get destroyed on the ground (post first-turn surprise) is very low. It's just one of the things you have to get used to as the Japanese.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
bbbf
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

RE: Airfields

Post by bbbf »

Yep, in my game against MC3744, I can barely keep a size 2 field closed bombing it nearly every day with 100-150 Helen's.
 
Every time the damage slips (due to weather or having to bomb another target), MC gets to kill a lot of my bombers as I close it again.
 
Basically, as Japan you can supress a field for a while, but you very seldom get to keep it closed.  And it only gets worse as the game progresses and the Allies start receiving more and more engineering units.
Robert Lee
histgamer
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:28 am

RE: Airfields

Post by histgamer »

[:(]
bbbf
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

RE: Airfields

Post by bbbf »

All JFB's are masochists!
 
Basically, after the glory days, anything you can do unto the Allies, the Allies can do unto you, but with a nuch bigger stick.
Robert Lee
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: Airfields

Post by RUPD3658 »

I managed to keep PM closed for a month after it was recaptured by the Allies but it took all of my Bettys and Sallys to do it.

Bombardments are the only way you will totally shut down an Allied AF.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
User avatar
RUPD3658
Posts: 6921
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2002 2:25 am
Location: East Brunswick, NJ

RE: Airfields

Post by RUPD3658 »

ORIGINAL: bbbf

All JFB's are masochists!

Basically, after the glory days, anything you can do unto the Allies, the Allies can do unto you, but with a nuch bigger stick.

Yes.....that is exactly what we want you to think.[:D]

Japan need not roll over and play dead come 1943.

Playing Japan after the end of 42 is totally different than in the glory days. It is still fun but different. My PBEM just started 1944 and I am focusing on a defensive plan along with the occasional hit and run raid to frustrate and irritate my opponant.
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has limits"- Darwin Awards 2003

"No plan survives contact with the enemy." - Field Marshall Helmuth von Moltke
[img]https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/upfi ... EDB99F.jpg[/img]
histgamer
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:28 am

RE: Airfields

Post by histgamer »

I honestly cant wait for planes crashing into ships. sounds like fun. Or does the messed up A2A system not allow any of ur planes through.[:D]
bbbf
Posts: 490
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

RE: Airfields

Post by bbbf »

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

ORIGINAL: bbbf

All JFB's are masochists!

Basically, after the glory days, anything you can do unto the Allies, the Allies can do unto you, but with a nuch bigger stick.

Yes.....that is exactly what we want you to think.[:D]

Japan need not roll over and play dead come 1943.

Playing Japan after the end of 42 is totally different than in the glory days. It is still fun but different. My PBEM just started 1944 and I am focusing on a defensive plan along with the occasional hit and run raid to frustrate and irritate my opponant.

Hey, I predominantly play as Japan!

Just being realistic - I am a masochist. Generally, as Japan, your victories are small ones in the late war period - but they are very sweet!
Robert Lee
User avatar
Ron Saueracker
Posts: 10967
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2002 10:00 am
Location: Ottawa, Canada OR Zakynthos Island, Greece

RE: Airfields

Post by Ron Saueracker »

ORIGINAL: RUPD3658

I managed to keep PM closed for a month after it was recaptured by the Allies but it took all of my Bettys and Sallys to do it.

Bombardments are the only way you will totally shut down an Allied AF.

Perhaps that is why it is possible in game to bombard massive airfield/base complexes into the stoneage in silly night shoot and scoot missions.[8|]
Image

Image

Yammas from The Apo-Tiki Lounge. Future site of WITP AE benders! And then the s--t hit the fan
User avatar
Honda
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 5:15 pm
Location: Karlovac, Croatia

RE: Airfields

Post by Honda »

What's easier to fix. A hole in the dirt or a hole in the tarmac?
User avatar
Feinder
Posts: 7187
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 7:33 pm
Location: Land o' Lakes, FL

RE: Airfields

Post by Feinder »

I honestly cant wait for planes crashing into ships. sounds like fun. Or does the messed up A2A system not allow any of ur planes through.

While it is fun to see "D4Y Judy hits Intrepid..."

Yes, the A2A system tends to effect a wholesale slaughter (think 300 - 400 planes lost in a single sorty vs. Allied mega-KB). And -probably- no hits (I'm not kidding).

I did have some success by trying to specifically target the CVE groups (Wildcats aren't nearly as good as Hellcats, and not as many of them). I sank a few CVEs. But then again, your opponent may not afford you that opportunity either.

But Kamis are *not* as effective as you think/want them to be (even if they hit, which rarely happens). And they tend for the same "target fixation" as every other bomber in WitP - I had 4 of them hit a single LST. It eventually sank after 3 days... [:@]

-F-
"It is obvious that you have greatly over-estimated my regard for your opinion." - Me

Image
histgamer
Posts: 1458
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 8:28 am

RE: Airfields

Post by histgamer »

Well historically most of them got blown outta the sky. I realize they were not effective, but its still a fun idea.[:D]
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Airfields

Post by Nikademus »

ORIGINAL: flanyboy

Whats the best way to destroy planes on the ground? Level bombing as japan dosnt seem to be very effective is it better to send carrier airplanes at say 2000 feet or what?

Best way if your using aircraft is to attack at normal range. Extended range payloads for Japanese naval 2E's in particular is very anemic.
User avatar
Yava
Posts: 2129
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:36 am
Location: Poland/Kolobrzeg

RE: Airfields

Post by Yava »

ORIGINAL: bbbf

All JFB's are masochists!

Basically, after the glory days, anything you can do unto the Allies, the Allies can do unto you, but with a nuch bigger stick.

I like to do the mentioned "Allies can do unto you, but with a nuch bigger stick"[:D]
But Kamis are *not* as effective as you think/want them to be (even if they hit, which rarely happens). And they tend for the same "target fixation" as every other bomber in WitP - I had 4 of them hit a single LST. It eventually sank after 3 days...

Banzai!!!![8D]
Image
Art by Dixie.
User avatar
KDonovan
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
Location: New Jersey

RE: Airfields

Post by KDonovan »


Whats the best way to destroy planes on the ground? Level bombing as japan dosnt seem to be very effective is it better to send carrier airplanes at say 2000 feet or what?



Best way if your using aircraft is to attack at normal range. Extended range payloads for Japanese naval 2E's in particular is very anemic.


also remember that Betty's/Nell's will only carry 2x250kg bombs on airfield attack missions (at all ranges). So your only true AF busting plane's are Helen's and Sally's at Normal range.
Image
Sonny II
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 2:05 pm

RE: Airfields

Post by Sonny II »

Playing Japan in '44 is easy:

Click end of phase.

Save game.

Send to opponent.

Can't believe I lasted until May of '45.
User avatar
jwilkerson
Posts: 8241
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 4:02 am
Location: Kansas
Contact:

RE: Airfields

Post by jwilkerson »

ORIGINAL: KDonovan


Whats the best way to destroy planes on the ground? Level bombing as japan dosnt seem to be very effective is it better to send carrier airplanes at say 2000 feet or what?



Best way if your using aircraft is to attack at normal range. Extended range payloads for Japanese naval 2E's in particular is very anemic.


also remember that Betty's/Nell's will only carry 2x250kg bombs on airfield attack missions (at all ranges). So your only true AF busting plane's are Helen's and Sally's at Normal range.

I think Betty/Nell carry 2x250KG on shorter range missions against AF, but only 1x250KG at longer ranges. Yes Helen's and Sally's are good, but Lily with 8x100KG and high exp will get more "runway" hits, just not as many service/suppply hits.

WITP Admiral's Edition - Project Lead
War In Spain - Project Lead
User avatar
KDonovan
Posts: 1157
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 12:52 am
Location: New Jersey

RE: Airfields

Post by KDonovan »



Best way if your using aircraft is to attack at normal range. Extended range payloads for Japanese naval 2E's in particular is very anemic.


also remember that Betty's/Nell's will only carry 2x250kg bombs on airfield attack missions (at all ranges). So your only true AF busting plane's are Helen's and Sally's at Normal range.



I think Betty/Nell carry 2x250KG on shorter range missions against AF, but only 1x250KG at longer ranges. Yes Helen's and Sally's are good, but Lily with 8x100KG and high exp will get more "runway" hits, just not as many service/suppply hits.

i find this info screen very confusing then. What does the "reduce load" stand for then. I always assumed it was for extended range missions



Image
Attachments
untitled.jpg
untitled.jpg (33.56 KiB) Viewed 222 times
Image
User avatar
Nikademus
Posts: 22517
Joined: Sat May 27, 2000 8:00 am
Location: Alien spacecraft

RE: Airfields

Post by Nikademus »

IIRC, nominally it refers to the extended range payload, however in the case of torpedo bombers it may refer to the alternate (land attack/< airbase 4) loadout.
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”