Usurpers

Post ALL Public Beta feedback here!

Moderators: Gil R., ericbabe

Post Reply
Ironclad
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:35 pm

Usurpers

Post by Ironclad »

I am wondering if the alphabetical priority used for same rank generals in containers could be contributing to an error that has occurred a few times whereby a more junior commander is named instead of the senior officer present on the scouting/terrain options screens. Examples are Carter (2 star) in a force of two corps commanded by Longstreet and Hood (each 3 star) and Hill (3 star) for the ANV commanded by Johnston (4 star).
User avatar
Erik Rutins
Posts: 39761
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2000 4:00 pm
Location: Vermont, USA
Contact:

RE: Usurpers

Post by Erik Rutins »

I could be wrong, but I recall Eric saying that this is not a bug - that any container commander can possibly "win" the scouting check and thus contribute to victory for his side, but it's far more likely for the highest rank commanders. So that would mean that the highest ranks failed, but a lower rank stepped up.
Erik Rutins
CEO, Matrix Games LLC


Image

For official support, please use our Help Desk: http://www.matrixgames.com/helpdesk/

Freedom is not Free.
Ironclad
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Nov 22, 2006 1:35 pm

RE: Usurpers

Post by Ironclad »

Interesting. I suppose its replicating those real life situations where a subordinate not the supremo initiates action or chooses what to hold.
User avatar
ericbabe
Posts: 11852
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:57 am
Contact:

RE: Usurpers

Post by ericbabe »

Yes, rank multiplies the rating, but a subordinate with a higher rating can be the one who makes the initiative check.
Image
Post Reply

Return to “Public Beta Feedback”