Pan Am and China

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

From the History of Pan American, I believe it would be correct historically to include at least one unit (or more) of "Pan American DC3 type aircraft" due to their historical involvement in India and China and Burma prior to the advent of the CATF..


The War Years
George E. Burns
Pan Am Historical Foundation


Pan Am Goes To War
When the United States exploded into World War II, the world's only aircraft that could carry payloads across an ocean were nine Pan Am Boeing 314 flying Clippers and three that Pan Am had sold to Britain. The U.S. government promptly took over all of Pan Am's over-ocean aircraft, crews and operations.


Pan Am, its people and its aircraft, went to war as part of the U.S. military. Officially.

The Secret War
However, covertly Pan Am was already deeply involved in the world conflict. For many months, under a secret War Department contract, it had been building and equipping airfields along the Atlantic coasts of Central and South America; then from Accra, on Africa's West coast, to Khartoum, the jumping-off point to air-supply the war raging in North Africa. Soon, when the U.S. entered the war, Pan Am crews were ferrying bombers and airlifting cargo over these South Atlantic, trans-Africa routes; and ferrying fighter planes, shipped by sea and assembled in West Africa, to Khartoum.


In seven months of 1942, 1,445 war planes, plus tons of supplies and ammunition, were delivered to the British army being pushed toward Suez. At El Alamein, these planes and supplies helped reverse the tide of the campaign. Pan Am then extended its wartime ferry and supply routes, flying fighters and bombers for Russia to Teheran, and hauling cargo to India. Its DC-3s flew The Hump over the Himalayas, bringing fuel and ammunition to the Flying Tigers and supplies to Chiang Kai-shek in China. They evacuated 3,564 women, children and wounded soldiers from Burma as it was about to be overrun.

A Thin Line of Flying Boats
Meanwhile, Pan Am's nine Boeing 314 and two Martin 130 Clippers, now owned by the U.S. government but still flown by Pan Am crews, were the sole thin line connecting America with the distant war zones. For nearly a year, until America began delivering new long-range airplanes in late 1942, the Army and Navy depended on these few Clippers to fly its highest-priority missions.




Boeing 314 Dixie Clipper


They flew President Roosevelt across the South Atlantic to meet Prime Minister Churchill in Casablanca, and Churchill from Bermuda to London after another meeting. The Clippers flew top military, diplomatic and industrial leaders on secret wartime missions. Thousands of refugees, including European royalty, and wounded servicemen flew the giant flying boats to safety. They flew desperately needed war materiel to the war fronts and the B-314s even played a role in the development of the Atomic Bomb, flying tons of uranium for the bomb from then-Leopoldville, Belgian Congo.

Training the Flyers
Prior to the outbreak of the war, Pan Am possessed the only extensive body of knowledge and experience in long range over water air navigation. This experience was pressed into service when Pan am was charged with training thousands of pilots and navigators in the art of navigation.


Pan Am's spirit flew even on General Doolittle's B-25 air strike that stunned Tokyo: eight navigators in his fleet were among the thousands of American and British airmen that Pan Am trained, at the University of Miami campus, in the art and skills of long-range aviation.

Pan Am's China
Five years before it crossed the Pacific in 1935, Pan Am began eyeing China, a vast expanse with virtually no railroads; with dirt paths for roads; its main traffic arteries rivers; where even short business trips could take painful weeks: a ripe market for air transport.


In 1933, Pan Am bought a 45% interest in China National Aviation Corporation, or CNAC. The government had to own 55% to make it a Chinese airline, and entitle it to bar all "foreign-owned" airlines-specifically Japan, which wanted landing rights. But Pan Am, under William Langhorne Bond, ran and largely funded CNAC.


CNAC's routes traced China's coastal crescent from Peiping in the North to Hong Kong in the south, with a stem stretching west from the crescent's midpoint to Chungking and Chengtu. Its fleet over the years included a Ford Trimotor, Sikorsky S-38s and S-43s, DC-2s, DC-3s, Douglas Dolphins, Commodores, and Condors.


The Chinese government was in Nanking, but communication and transportation were so poor that it could not control the country, and local war lords ruled large areas. When Nanking told CNAC to fly to Chungking, the war lord there said he would shoot any CNAC personnel who did. They had to negotiate with the war lord. Meanwhile, hostilities between Japan and China had broken out near Shanghai. CNAC operated in a dangerous environment from the start.


When Japan invaded China in 1937, the United States, still neutral, called all American personnel home. Many nevertheless stayed. Bond resigned from Pan Am, so as not to implicate the company in his continued operation of CNAC. Pan Am continued his benefits and seniority for the duration.


CNAC, though still run by Pan Am personnel, was a Chinese government airline, at war. CNAC planes frequently evacuated Chinese from cities, even as Japanese troops were entering them. The encircling Japanese eventually cut off all access from the Pacific, leading CNAC became the pathfinders of China's last gateway, over the Hump to British India. By this time, however, the United States had entered the war.

Leaving Hong Kong
William Langhorne Bond, who ran CNAC, was dressing in his hotel room in Hong Kong when the phone rang. Clipper Captain Fred Ralph said the Kai Tak airport manager had told him to take his Clipper off at once. But Manila, his destination, had radioed not to come there. It was the morning of December 8, 1941.


Within minutes they learned Japan had declared war. Bond told the captain to expect Japanese planes over the airport in minutes, get passengers, crew and mail off the plane into the hangar, with all other station personnel. And to pray.


Air raid sirens blared as Bond raced from the hotel, comandeered a sampan-the Star ferries were not running-and got to Kowloon. No one was hurt. Otherwise, he found what he expected. The Clipper, burned to the water line, was sinking. Strafing had totalled five CNAC Condors, a DC-2 and a DC-3.


Safe in the hangar were two DC-3s and a DC-2, which were quickly towed a half mile away and camouflaged. Hours later a Japanese bomb pierced the hangar. Another DC-2 was arriving from Rangoon that night. These four CNAC planes would be Hong Kong's evacuation fleet.


For three years, since Japanese fighters shot down a departing CNAC transport, Hong Kong flights had operated at night only. Bond decided to shuttle as many key persons as possible 200 miles inland over the Japanese lines until the Japanese got within artillery range of the airport. He called U.S. and Chinese government officials to prepare for immediate departure.


At nightfall the three loaded planes took off in quick succession. Some hours later air raid sirens sounded, and British gunners prepared to meet an attack. Fortunately they recognized in time the first DC-3 returning for another load. By dawn, the end of CNAC's work day, the fleet had completed two shuttle runs.


The next day Bond continued mobilizing passengers. Not all were eager to leave. Madame SunYat-sen and the Finance Minister's wife believed that Hong Kong could hold out for three months, by which time the U.S. fleet would arrive and protect them. Persuaded otherwise, they arrived at Kai Tak Tuesday night and asked that a plane evacuate their party, alone, immediately. Bond diplomatically demurred.


On the last flight that night Bond left for CNAC's Chungking base to plan operations.


The afternoon of the third day, Hong Kong radioed him to cancel flights that night. The fourth day, Hong Kong radioed two planes in the air and within an hour of Hong Kong not to land. The window had closed.


In the two nights after the Japanese attack, CNAC had evacuated 275 Chinese and Americans, and removed its headquarters to Chungking.





http://www.panam.org/default1.asp


I do not feel a single unit in Hong Kong is enough to represent Pan Am for the historical involvement of Pan Am..
In Martin Caidens' book RAGGED RUGGED WARRIORS, the planes operated from Dum Dum airfield near Calcutta to supply the AVG, and some of the mechanics were the Brit ground crew evacuated from Rangoon.
Some of the pilots were military, (not just Pan Am civilian pilots), and this would be no stranger than civilian shipping being impressed into the war cause..

Image
Attachments
Venerable DC 3.jpg
Venerable DC 3.jpg (37.83 KiB) Viewed 930 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Regarding Pan Am "CNAC" planes:

Image
Attachments
cnac_dc25.jpg
cnac_dc25.jpg (56.52 KiB) Viewed 929 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

CNAC DC3 image drawn by famous aviation artist Robert Taylor

Image
Attachments
DC3CNAC.jpg
DC3CNAC.jpg (107.97 KiB) Viewed 926 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Just threw this in because it is georgeous!
(Clipper at Hong Kong)

Image
Attachments
HongKongClipper.jpg
HongKongClipper.jpg (17.2 KiB) Viewed 926 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Advertisement for 1941

Image
Attachments
1941Outposts.jpg
1941Outposts.jpg (106.39 KiB) Viewed 928 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Magazine ad August 1941

Image
Attachments
adaviation81941.jpg
adaviation81941.jpg (174.4 KiB) Viewed 927 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Involved training the military 1942

Image
Attachments
PanAmtra..taryWW2.jpg
PanAmtra..taryWW2.jpg (40.13 KiB) Viewed 926 times
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Memoir of a Pan Am Pilot "Flying the Hump"


The Evacuation of Burma
I Wayne Eveland
Captain, Pan Am Africa


On December 4, 1941, Wayne Eveland was one of a group of new-hire Pan Am pilots that left Washington, DC, to fly the routes from Accra to Cairo. They were in a flying boat crossing the Pacific when they learned that the United States was now in the war. Within months he was among the Pan Am/Africa pilots more than 1000 miles further East, flying the notorious Hump between India and China for the 10th Air Force

Flying the Hump
For my co-pilot, Leo E. Viens, and myself, the China-Burma-India story began with a simple announcement on the pilots' Bulletin Board at Accra stating that the Tenth Air Force in India was asking for volunteers for temporary duty assignments that might include service in an active war sector. No details were mentioned. Leo agreed this would give us a chance to see something of India and the Far East, and I signed us up.


We left Accra on the 9th of April 1942 and finally arrived at Dinjan, India, in the northeast extremity of India, on the 17th. We learned many facts the bulletin board had failed to mention.


The Japanese had taken the seaport cities of China and Burma and were marching north [through Burma] against light resistance to isolate China by cutting the Burma Road. Sick and wounded soldiers, as well as thousands of refugees, were fleeing north in hope of air evacuation to India before the Japanese overtook them. In April and May, less than one dozen PAA-Africa crews, less than a half dozen each of Army Air and CNAC crews, and a dozen or less RAF crews, saved many thousands of soldiers and refugees from death or imprisonment in Burma.


The aircraft were unarmed. Every flight was overloaded. The aerial maps were often in error. There was no oxygen, although altitudes of 19,000 feet were common in storms over some of the most rugged mountains on earth. Radio aids were non-existent, yet let-downs were usually to airfields in deep valleys. Few if any aircraft were equipped with de-icing equipment, though ice was common.


The main evacuation point was Myitkyina, Burma, at the northern end of a rail line, about 250 miles north of Mandalay. Each day more and more wounded and refugees crowded the airstrip; toward the end it was pandemonium. PAA captains gave first priority to stretcher cases, wounded, women and children. Often Burmese ladies would say all the children in their charge were their own. We knew they probably included children of sisters, brothers, in-laws, and whatever, but how could we tell? We piled them on board. When the seats were filled we kept stacking them aboard sitting and standing. Before takeoff we crowded everyone forward to get the weight forward. We filled the baggage areas behind the pilots with people. We could not save them all, but we saved thousands.


One pilot, Captain Hubbard, flying on instruments in a heavy rainstorm, was disoriented by lack of radio aids and almost out of gasoline and made a successful forced landing in a rice paddy. After unloading ammunition at LioWing, China, I was bombed on 28 April and the tail assembly was blown away. When emergency repairs were completed, the plane was loaded with 40 or 50 sick, wounded, and refugees who were delivered safely to India. On another occasion Leo and I made a successful mercy flight from Myitkyina to India with 74 passengers plus a crew of two, a total of 76. We believed this to be a world record for a DC-3 designed for only 26 passengers. The overloading punishable by court-martial in peace time was justified by humanitarian concerns in a wartime emergency.


Japanese bombers and fighters often entered the area where we were picking up wounded and refugees, but they did not worry PAA pilots nearly as much as the abominable weather. Mountain peaks jutted into the clouds where rescue planes usually were on instruments. I am sure the dangerous mountains and terrible weather protected us more from Japanese interceptors than a fighter escort could.


The greatest worry for most pilots was how to find the airport without radio assistance. Although a few of our airports had radios, they seldom were turned on, because Japanese planes could "home" on them. Dinjan was in a deep valley surrounded by mountains. Returning there on instruments, not knowing whether he had a headwind or a tailwind, with only "time and distance" calculations to rely on, the pilot began his let-down when he HOPED he was above the ridge into the valley. If he assumed a headwind but had a tailwind he would overfly the base and hit the ridge beyond. If he assumed a tailwind but had a headwind, he would undershoot and hit the closer ridge. Gauging the minute to start the let-down was playing "Russian roulette".


The next morning PAA crews were in their aircraft at Dinjan waiting for the takeoff signal. Leo Viens and I were supposed to be the first out. Meanwhile, two British DC-3s took off for Myitkyina. Finally operations canceled our mission. Later we learned that Dallas Sherman, who led the PAA pilots assigned to the 10th Air Force, had insisted that the Air Force send its only P-40 to determine whether the Japanese had taken over the Myitkyina airfield during the night, before he would release PAA crews to fly there. Meanwhile a radio report came back from Myitkyina that the two British aircraft had landed but had been destroyed by Japanese fighters, and that the Japanese now controlled the airfield.


In all, the airlift evacuated 3,564 women, children, and wounded soldiers from Burma. When Burma fell, the Hump route became the only access to China.Thanks to Dallas Sherman, Leo Vein and I are still around to recount these facts.
This story originally appeared in Issue 7 of "The Clipper", the newletter of The Pan Am Historical Foundation

Image

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

First of all - and this may be my fault - we should not be doing civil air organizations.

RHS added a SELECT few where these had military significance. Empire Flying boats were pressed into actual patrol duty - and both USAAF and USN set up to do the same with the Boeing 314s (but in the event didn't use them much at all). I put these in to balance the para military DNKKK - and a few smaller Japanese organizations - which were proper reserve military formations.

We should not think that a foreign operated air line in China was a Chinese military organization - it was not. Put in too much of this (never mind we have slot shortages) and players will end up using them for everything you can imagine.

The only Chinese civil air transport unit in RHS is a set of planes which were in the event lost on the first day of the war -at Hong Kong - but which might have performed an auxiliary function had they not been. Other assets were too scattered to matter - and I am not aware of any plan to turn them into an effective unit in a military sense. Civil aircraft in China were almost uniformly not DC-3s - but smaller twin engine aircraft - including DC-2s. There were DC-3s - and one famous "DC 2 and 1/2" !

Pan Am was almost an agent of the US Navy - and it did indeed built routes for national reasons. These services were not - however - mainly served by Douglas landplanes - but by flying boats. There is a nice book on the matter "The Pan Am Clippers"
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: el cid again

First of all - and this may be my fault - we should not be doing civil air organizations.

RHS added a SELECT few where these had military significance. Empire Flying boats were pressed into actual patrol duty - and both USAAF and USN set up to do the same with the Boeing 314s (but in the event didn't use them much at all). I put these in to balance the para military DNKKK - and a few smaller Japanese organizations - which were proper reserve military formations.

We should not think that a foreign operated air line in China was a Chinese military organization - it was not. Put in too much of this (never mind we have slot shortages) and players will end up using them for everything you can imagine.

The only Chinese civil air transport unit in RHS is a set of planes which were in the event lost on the first day of the war -at Hong Kong - but which might have performed an auxiliary function had they not been. Other assets were too scattered to matter - and I am not aware of any plan to turn them into an effective unit in a military sense. Civil aircraft in China were almost uniformly not DC-3s - but smaller twin engine aircraft - including DC-2s. There were DC-3s - and one famous "DC 2 and 1/2" !

Pan Am was almost an agent of the US Navy - and it did indeed built routes for national reasons. These services were not - however - mainly served by Douglas landplanes - but by flying boats. There is a nice book on the matter "The Pan Am Clippers"


Just curious..Did you read what I posted, or is your mind made up on this?
The "ownership" by Pan Am of CNAC was nearly 50% to appease the Chinese, as I mentioned in a prior post some weeks ago.(Took me this long to find where I had read it.
The 1st article posted here somewhat details that while Pan Am (and CNAC) were for official purposes "civilian", they were indeed performing a "government contracted "under the table" function" of a couple of goverments, and were using both civilian and military personell.
We are not talking about bringing in Eastern Airlines, TWA, or a myriad of other "civilian" airlines, but one which played a more military role than did "Seaboard World" or "Air America" in our days, Sid......
Image

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

ORIGINAL: m10bob



Just curious..Did you read what I posted, or is your mind made up on this?
The "ownership" by Pan Am of CNAC was nearly 50% to appease the Chinese, as I mentioned in a prior post some weeks ago.(Took me this long to find where I had read it.
The 1st article posted here somewhat details that while Pan Am (and CNAC) were for official purposes "civilian", they were indeed performing a "government contracted "under the table" function" of a couple of goverments, and were using both civilian and military personell.
We are not talking about bringing in Eastern Airlines, TWA, or a myriad of other "civilian" airlines, but one which played a more military role than did "Seaboard World" or "Air America" in our days, Sid......

Yes. And I attempted to say that these are civil airlines. Hauling government cargo does not a military air unit make.
Military air units - on the Allied side - could be used for anything - even dropping paratroopers - forward area supply - name it. There had been a time in China when there was some interesting transport done by a semi-mercinary squadron. It was long past when PTO erupted into what we call WITP. By then the transport planes were destoyed, in bad shape and unfit for pressing continuous military type operations, or had left the country. You had remnants of a civil air fleet - sans many of its American personnell and other foreigners - which were scattered - not operating at a base in a paramilitary fashion. The one unit you have in RHS WAS at a single point - a point which had been protected from Japan by the British - and it still had its full staff - and might have momentarily been a cohesive unit. Clever players might be able to fly them out of Hong Kong - for example - which certainly was an option.

Re Pan Am in its American format - note we have ALL the surviving Boeing 314 clippers in USAAF or USN service (including 3 that served a while with the Army) - in two special detachments - already in all RHS scenarios. If you want to use em - or even abuse em as true military transports for air assault - you have em already.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

I don't get it, Sid..
I have referanced time,place, locale and memoir of the DC2,DC3 and even Ford trimotor planes which were "in place" in India, Burma, China before and during the war, flying the Hump before the 10th AF ever arrived, and yet you keep coming back to 9 flying boats, which I am not addressing whatsoever.
Somewhat myopic.
Indeed, the "conglomeration" of nationalities is because this particular "civilian" operation was so diverse, and apparently did not fool anybody to its' purpose, (to attract the international air and groundcrews.)
You may look further into this matter by actually investing the time to look at the link provided, for the sake of history, or continue to ignore the subject, based on your own admitted pre-judgement on the matter.
One way will (imho) be considerate of history, the other will not.
I have suggested "one,(or more) units, operating with DC3 type planes.
You give us a few smaller planes in Hong Kong as a dog bone.
You quip that a smart player might move them (and upgrade), and proffer that the planes might be misused by the players in game.
Paratroopers,Sid?..Where do they come from?
None in theatre for a long time, and by then, the "military" units will be on hand, (unless you think somebody might send a USMC para unit to China, for whatever advantage the time delay might yield??)
Well...maybe a show of hands is in order...
HOW MANY PLAYERS WILL SEND MARINE PARATROOPERS TO CHINA IN EARLY '42???????
IRL, they transported people and supplies, in and out,(please read the posted narratives.)
Request you take another look at the subject.
I had to read the exploits of the AVG, 10th Air Force, and Caiden's book before I was solidly convinced.
Its' not the entire corporation, Sid, just a few stationed at Calcutta.
NOT CNAC..
Pan Am.
Not "flying boats", DC's...........
Image

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

It is not my intention to be disrespectful of history. A wargame is a compromise. WITP is a compromise I didn't design. We pretty much do not have the code or the slots to consider adding civil aviation in general. And if we do so you are going to see players - not always abusive players but ignorant ones - delivering the vast numbers of Allied paras using them. You also will see them delivering supplies to forward bases.

The flying boats are a different kettle of fish entirely. They MATTER (at least potentially) because they can fly long range naval search missions - and did IRL - at a time the number of long rang patrol planes is critically short. They are so few in number they won't be able to be abused very badly (even innocently by someone who does not know better) because they cannot lift a major force or a huge amount of supplies in a single flight. They really were organized on a para military basis by both sides. These factors mean that they are neat chrome. I didn't intend to imply that we should do this for civil airliners in general.

On the Allied side there is yet another problem you seem not to be aware of: numbers of USAAF squadrons formed up on the other side of the pond using local, civil airliners. IF we put them in as civil, they will be duplicated when the military units form up.

More generally, we are not in a position to know the condition of many planes - or indeed even to identify them.
IF we did know the numbers, and put them all in, we would surely be letting players use planes that could not fly at all.

One problem is that civil airliners should not be moved at will. To complicate this I made the ground support (which I DO give you) part of static units. IF you move them you must support them on military assets. I also recommend a house rule about not using them in any forward area. But in a place like China or Burma - how could you NOT use them in a forward area? Civil airlines either do not belong in WITP - not being designed for them - or they need to remain small, specialist units operated at points distant from major land battles. To move strategic supplies and troops in the rear - or to do naval search at long ranges when proper planes are not available.

These are all judgement calls. But if I have erred it was to enter this swamp in the first place. No one has yet complained about adding civil aircraft. But if we do enough of it I am sure we will get complaints - and justifiably so.
You need not agree with my opinion. But it is not germane to claim I am being unkind to history: this is a military simulation - a naval simulation above all - and one not designed to model civil aircraft at all. I have to justify making exceptions - and I did so as outlined above. My choices aren't the same thing as being ignorant of aviation in the area in the period - they are made in the context of what will work well within the limits of the game system we are modding.

As for sending forces to China early - only smart players will do that. It is not well understood in the West - but it IS well understood in Asia - that the war is about China. No China - no causus belli. And the autarky Japan seeks is meaningful only if it secures the mainland. China is a place that Japanese naval power has little meaning - and even early the Allies can make great strides there - at first ignoring and eventually imatiating Japanese naval power.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

History of the U.S. 10th Air Force.:

MONDAY, 6 APRIL 1942

(10th Air Force): 10 DC-3's of Pan American Airways begin hauling 30,000 gallons of fuel and 500 gallons of lubricants from Calcutta to the airstrip at Asansol, India, completing the mission on the following day. This fuel, subsequently transferred via Dinjan, India to China, is for use by Lieutenant Colonel James H Doolittle's Tokyo raiders, already at sea aboard the aircraft carrier USS Hornet (CV-8).

http://www.pacificwrecks.com/60th/today/1942/4-42.html
(Just more fuel for the fire.)[:D]
Image

User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

Pan Am...U.S. 10th A.F. and the ATC

Within this very interesting read, can be found the following:"Almost 90% of ATC's flying in 1942 was military contract flying by the airlines."

This narrative is great info, whether I get "my" Pan Am unit, or not.[;)]

ATC

While military airlift had its beginnings in the troop carrier squadrons in New Guinea, the modern airlift apparatus is a direct result of the development of the Air Transport Command during World War II. Essentially an airline in military uniform, the Air Transport Command started the war on a very small scale and finished as a gigantic organization larger than the entire United States commercial airline establishment.

Though there was an air transportation organization in existence within the US Army Air Corps Material Division before the war, the ATC was an outgrowth of the Ferrying Command, which was established to deliver US-built aircraft destined for Britain under Lend-lease from the factories on the West Coast to embarkation points on the East Coast where they were either picked up by British pilots or loaded onboard ships for the trip across the Atlantic. Prior to Pearl Harbor Ferrying Command depended upon the Air Force Combat Command for its pilots, who gained valuable experience as they flew a variety of airplanes across the country, and in some cases across the Atlantic as well. While aircraft delivery was their primary mission, Ferrying Command established passenger routes across the Atlantic in mid-1941, using converted B-24 Liberator bombers for the trips.

In the summer of 1941 Pan American Airways contracted with the US and British governments to deliver US-built airplanes to Khartoum in Sudan, using Miami as a point of embarkation. Soon after Pearl Harbor the route was extended by contract from Khartoum on to Cairo and Teheran. Eastern Airlines supplemented Pan Am out of Miami beginning in May, 1942. In February, 1942 Northwest Airlines began service to Alaska and was soon joined by Western and United Airlines on the route. Other airline contracts were let for transport services within the United States. Some of the contracts were let through Ferrying Command while others were with other military organizations. The profusion of contracts by so many different groups led the Chairman of the Civil Aeronautics Board, L.W. Pogue, to propose that all airline operations be conducted under a single command reporting directly to the President of the United States and independent of both the Army and the Navy. Pogue's recommendation was not followed completely, but on June 20, 1942 General Henry H. Arnold, chief of staff of the Army Air Forces, established the Air Transport Command and made it responsible for all ferrying and transportation tasks except those necessary for combat operations. Those tasks were assigned to the Troop Carrier organizations.

The new ATC was established as a military airline, and in fact drew very heavily upon the airlines for personnel, both aircrews and administrative. Though the ATC commander was BGen. Harold L. George, a veteran military officer who was known as an expert in bombardment, his executive officer was Col. Cyrus R. Smith, who in civilian life was president of American Airlines. As ATC chief of staff, Smith was largely responsible for the development of the new military airline. The Air Transportation Division was commanded by Col. Robert J. Smith, who had come into uniform from his position as vice-president of Braniff Airlines. Dozens of other airline personnel served in executive positions throughout the new Air Transport Command.

With the country now at war, ATC soon found itself deprived of the services of the combat pilots who had been ferrying airplanes for its predecessor. Prior to the establishment of ATC, the Army Air Corps had begun calling up airline reservists for duty with the Ferrying Command. The first group of reservists began training at Morrison Field, Florida and were soon on their way to India to form the nucleus of the 1st Ferrying Group, the organization who would inagurate the airlift of supplies into China. In mid-1941 the Ferrying Command had been authorized to employ civilian pilots but the program was not implemented until early 1942. Non-airline civilian pilots were employed on a temporary basis in a 90-day trial period. If, at the end of the trial, a pilot was found competent for transport flying, he was offered a commission as a service pilot, a rating with qualifications that were somewhat lower than that of combat pilots. By the end of 1942 1,372 service pilots had been commissioned out of 1,730 who had been recruited for the program. By this time the number of available civilian pilots had dwindled, while more military trained pilots were available. In 1944, as pilot training programs were cut, a large number of civilian instructors were commissioned for duty with ATC. The Women's Air Service Pilots were also a part of the Air Transport Command ferrying division, until the WASPS were disbanded in 1944. A nucleus of experienced military pilots and aircrew personnel who had served with Ferrying Command on a temporary basis were made permanent members of ATC. General George also instituted the Civilian Pilot Training program, in anticipation of using it to provide a supply of men who could serve as copilots on transport crews. But the CPT proved less productive than anticipated, and only a few hundred graduates of the program took their places in ATC airplanes.

Not only were civilian pilots recruited, the airline industry was heavily involved in military operations under contract with ATC. While some airline pilots were called to active duty, their essential status made them exempt from the draft. Almost 90% of ATC's flying in 1942 was military contract flying by the airlines. As the war continued the ratio of airline contract flying to that performed by military crews dropped, until by the end of the war as much as 81% of ATC flying was by military crews.

Finding crews was one problem, finding suitable airplanes was another. In 1941 there were NO military transports in existence, so the military was forced to purchase airplanes that had been designed for the commercial airlines and adapt them for military use. Prior to Pearl Harbor, the War Department had already made a heavy committment to purchase Douglas Aircraft's DC-3 and DC-4, but both airplanes had been designed for passenger transportation and neither possesed true military capabilities, though both performed admirably during the war. The C-47 version of the DC-3 would do yeoman's service during the war, especially with Troop Carrier, but it was considered to be too slow and lacking in payload for overwater transportation. Led by C.R. Smith, who was now a brigadier general, ATC decided to pen its hopes on the Curtiss C-46, which was also an airline design. More than 450 C-46s had been ordered by the Army before the war, but only two were in existence by Pearl Harbor. Testing on domestic routes by the airlines indicated that the C-46 had excellent performance. But when the airplane entered service with ATC, a number of defects emerged - particularly a tendency for the airplane to explode while in flight! But hundreds of C-46s were put to use by ATC.

For 4-engine transports, the C-54 was on order but not yet available. Prior to the war Ferrying Command operated a few modified B-24s, and after Pearl Harbor some LB-30 Liberators were repossessed from Britain and converted for transport use. While two went to Australia where they served with Troop Carrier forces, five were put to work on a route between California and Australia. A special transport version of the Liberator came into being as several B-24Ds were converted to become C-87 transports. The C-87s and C-46s were responsbile for a good portion of the ATC misison until the advent of the C-54.

As the war progressed, the Air Transport Command developed a route structure from the United States to every theater of the war. Routes went from the East Coast to England by way of Canada, from the West Coast to Australia by way of Hawaii and the South Pacific Islands, from Miami and other East Coast bases to North Africa, across Canada to Alaska and into the Aleutians and south into Central and South America. The longest of the ATC routes, and the longest in the Allied supply line, was the route to China and the CBI theater of war. The route to China went south out of Miami to Natal, Brazil, then across the Atlantic to Africa and on across the Middle East to finally arrive in India, which was the rear area for the CBI.

ATC transports were used primarily to carry "high value" items of cargo such as aircraft parts and other material that was too crucial to spend long periods in the cargo holds of ships traversing the U-boat infested waters of the Atlantic and other oceans. Ferrying of combat aircraft was perhaps the most important ATC mission of the war. Returning ATC transports moved USAAF combat crews who were rotating home while some airplanes were configured as air ambulances for the transport of patients from the war zones. Air rescue and weather reconnaissance became part of the ATC mission as more and more airplanes began plying the skies along the command's far-flung routes.

The most famous ATC mission of the war, and the only one that came close to a combat mission, was the airlift effort over the Himalayan Hump from India into China. Resupplying China by air became a major priority at the very beginning of the war. In February, 1942 President Roosevelt instructed General Arnold to commandeer 25 DC-3s from the airlines and to use them as the nucleus for an air supply line into China from India. A group of airline reservists began training in Florida in March and were soon on their way to India to become the 1st Ferrying Group. They were preceeded by a group of ten Pan Am DC-3s that were sent to India to carry fuel into China from India to refuel the Doolittle Raiders. Colonel Caleb Haynes was placed in command of the Assam-Burma-China Ferry Command, which at the time consisted of four US Army C-47s and the Pan Am DC-3s.The Pan Am and Army transports were put to work supporting the Allied effort to hold Burma, as well as to airlift supplies into China proper. A route was drawn up from India into Myitkyina, an airfield in Burma, from which supplies could be barged and trucked into China, with plans for the air route to be extended to Chungking when the airplanes were available. But Burma fell to the Japanese in early May, 1942 and China was cutoff from the rest of the world except by air.

With Burma in Japanese hands, the only route into China was north out of India's Assam Valley across the eastern reaches of the Himalaya, then east into China. While the route kept the transports relatively free from enemy attack, it led over terrain that was higher than any in the United States in a region that was characterized by violent storms, with snow and ice in the higher altitudes at which the transports had to fly to cross the mountains. Flying the Himalayan Hump would turn out to be some of the most dangerous flying in the world. But in mid-1942 there was another problem that severely hampered the planned airlift to China - the Japanese now held Burma and were advancing into parts of India. The few transports that were in the CBI at the time were not sufficient to support the combat operations in the theater and at the same time maintain a constant flow of supplies into China. To alleviate the situation, the Tenth Air Force contracted with China National Airways Corporation, a Chinese airline owned in part by Pan American, to transport supplies to China, thus freeing the military transports for combat operations in support of British, Indian and Chinese troops who were still on the ground in the Naga Hills in northern Burma and those who were combating the advancing Japanese in the eastern reaches of India. When possible, the 1st Ferrying Group transports and those of the Tenth Air Force Troop Carrier units in the region airlifted supplies into China, but the bulk of the mission at first fell to the CNAC.

What happened next depends upon one's point of view. By rights, the airlift of supplies from India into China was a theater mission and should have been controlled by the theater commander, which in this case was US Army Lt. General Joe Stillwell. But China maintained a major political lobby in the United States, while American manufacturers who had contracts with the Chinese government were eager to get their supplies into China. Frank D. Sinclair, who held the position of Aviation Technical Advisor with China Defense Supplies, Inc, went to the CBI on behalf of his employer and made "a study" of the operation. Sinclair's report, in which he accused the Tenth Air Force leadership of a "defeatist attitude," was passed to C.R. Smith. Sinclair believed that with "125 transports" assigned to the Hump project alone, it would be possible to airlift 10,000 tons a month to China. Sinclair believed that there should be "singleness of purpose" in regard to getting supplies to China, a view he shared with Smith. Smith recommended to General Arnold that ATC be given responsbility for the airlift of supplies into China, and that all control should be under ATC Headquarters in Washington, DC. Neither Sinclair nor Smith took into consideration the fact that the whole military situation in the CBI at the time was in doubt, and that the assignment of 125 airplanes to the theater solely to support a non-combat operation would be folly. Yet Washington directed Stillwell that as of December 1, 1942 responsibility for the airlift to China would transfer from Tenth Air Force to ATC.

When ATC took over the airlift, the combined Tenth Air Force and CNAC transport force was starting to make headway toward reaching the tonnage goals that were being set for the China airlift in faraway Washington. After the transfer to ATC, tonnage levels actually DECLINED, and it would be nearly a year before the airlift would even come close to reaching the goals that had been set for the first months of ATC operation. The problem was not lack of airplanes and/or crews, but ran much deeper. CNAC airplanes operating over the same routes as the ATC transports were proving far more efficient than the military transports. CNAC transports were lifting on an average MORE THAN TWICE as much tonnage per airplane than the ATC crews were, even though ATC was flying airplanes that afforded twice the tonnage of the CNAC DC-3s in many instances as well as C-47s of comparable capability. At the same time, Troop Carrier squadrons in the theater were proving more efficient in their first months of operation than the ATC crews were, even though they were newly arrived in the theater.

The ATC pilots and aircrews were not rookies. In fact, as a group they were very experienced former airline pilots with a great deal of flying time. But they approached things from a civilian outlook, and they were not happy about the conditions under which they were living in India. In the summer of 1942 USAAF chief of staff Maj. Gen. George E. Stratemeyer visited the CBI along with Eddie Rickenbacker, who was himself an airline executive but who was not affiliated with ATC. They reported problems in the ATC effort, and recommended that the Hump Airlift be transferred back to Tenth Air Force. ATC commander Maj. Gen. Harold George attempted to place the blame on "past practices" that had been inherited from the 1st Ferrying Group. Rickenbacker believed the relative inexperience of many of the newly assigned ATC pilots, most of whom were service pilots, in the operations found in the region was part of the problem while the limited number of airfields, a lack of adequate weather forecasting facilities, a shortage of maintenance personnel and a lack of radio aids were others. Rickenbacker's recommendation that the airlift be removed from ATC was not accepted in Washington and the airlift remained an ATC responsibility.

In early January, 1943 shortly after ATC took over the airlift, the ATC India/China Wing commander, Col. Edward H. Alexander, complained that the C-47s and DC-3s with which his command was equipped were "not suitable" for operations on the Hump route. In early March the first C-46s left for India to replace an equal number of C-47s. Fifty C-87 four-engine transports were also promised. But deliveries were slow, and when the C-46s reached India they proved to be suffering from a number of problems that made them deficient for airlift operations without major modifications. ATC initiated the Hump Airlift with eleven C-87s and 76 C-47s. The monthly goal was 4,000 pounds, but it was not until late in the year that it was reached. Sinclair had said in his report that 10,000 tons a month were possible with 125 airplanes assigned. But it was a year before the ATC apparatus reached that goal.

Though the ATC transports were in a non-combat status, some were occasionally diverted from China airlift duties to support of the Tenth Air Force Troop Carrier Command. This happened in early 1944 when Japanese advances into India threatened the surface supply lines into the Assam Valley, and when the airlift bases themselves were even threatened. A Japanese offensive in China overran many of the Fourteenth Air Force bases later in the year, but by that time the Allies were beginning to make headway in Burma, and the war was turning against Japan. ATC historians use these diversions as one explanation for why the Hump Airlift did not live up to expectations.

In the spring of 1944 the Allies invaded Burma from the air. A massive Troop Carrier Command operation airlifted glidertroops into Burma, then kept them supplied by airdrop and airlandings on two hastily prepared jungle landing strips. BGen. Frank Merrill's "Marauders" advanced across northern Burma and captured the airfield at Myitkyina, though the Japanese in the nearby town held out until August. The capture of Myitkyina had a profound effect on the Hump Airlift; it afforded the return to the more southerly route into China as well as an enroute supply base and refueling stop. Previously, the otherwise capable C-54s were unsuitable for Hump duties because of altitude limitations. Now they could be used on the southern routes while the C-87s and C-46s continued operating across the Hump.

The spring of 1944 also brought an expansion of the ATC Hump force as the Twentieth Air Force arrived in India with the first B-29s, with the intention of staging missions against Japan from advanced bases inside China. Twentieth Air Force brought with them 20 C-87 transports, which were assigned to ATC and dedicated for B-29 support. ATC also received a new group of C-46s specifically for B-29 support. At the same time the B-29 "MATTERHORN" force included a number of converted B-24s fitted with internal fuel tanks and designated as C-109s. The assignment of the B-29s to the CBI led to a dramatic increase in tonnage across the Hump as ATC now had priority and was finally able to get the airplanes and support it needed. When the B-29s moved out of China to the Mariannas in late 1944 their airlift support remained in India and transferred to ATC. Then, in the spring of 1945, as ground combat operations in the theater wound down, two B-24 groups (7th and 308th), the 443rd Troop Carrier Group, the 3rd and 4th Combat Cargo groups and two squadrons from the 1st CCG all transferred to ATC control. While the formerly tactical crews were very unhappy to be finishing out the war under ATC, they made a major contribution to the total Hump tonnage, and were to a large extent responsible for the record amounts of cargo carried by ATC during the final weeks of the war.

While the Hump Airlift was not particularly dangerous in terms of combat operations - though a few ATC transports were intercepted by Japanese fighters and shot down - the terrible weather over the Himalaya region ,coupled with the high altitudes of the airfields in the Assam Valley and at some of the destination fields in China, led to a very high accident rate. This was especially true in the C-87s and C-109s, due to the much higher takeoff and landing weights the crews operated at. Liberator-type transports suffered an accident rate that was 500% higher than that of C-54s and other ATC transports in the ATC system. So many airplanes were lost on the Hump - the CAF Hump site says more than 600 - that the northern route into China was known as "The Aluminum Trail."

While the Hump effort is the most famous and was undoubtedly the most difficult of the ATC missions, other routes required great skill and effort on the part of the crews who were assigned. The Alaska route went north out of Great Falls, Montana across Alberta, the Yukon and Alaska to Anchorage, over terrain that was not exactly the most hospitable in the world. Initially, the Alaska route was seen as a means of resupplying American installations in Alaska and the Aleutians, but the major mission turned out to be ferrying airplanes from the United States for delivery to the Soviet Air Force at Ladd Field outside Fairbanks. More than 8,000 airplanes were delivered over the route. Most were Bell Airacobras and Kingcobras, along with A-20s, B-25s and C-47s. ATC personnel were based at Edmonton as well as other Canadian bases. A major mission for ATC pilots at the enroute bases was search and rescue for Ferrying Command pilots and crews who were forced down in the remote wilderness. Much of the transport along the route was an airline responsibility, with Northwest Airlines and Western Airlines operating the routes under contract. The ATC Alaska Wing was equipped with a number of single-engine C-64 "Norseman" light transports, which were equipped alternatively with pontoons, skis and wheels, depending the season. The C-64s were used to resupply stations along the Canadian pipeline as well as for search and rescue work.

Air Transport Command began the war as an organization with heavy civilian influence. A large number of the staff officers were airline personnel who had been commissioned as Army officers. Much of the command's strength came in the form of airline flight crews who were in military reserve status, while other pilots were civilians pilot who were commissioned on the basis of their civilian flight experience. As the war continued, the ranks of ATC were swelled with the assignment of former combat personnel who had completed their overseas tours in B-17s and B-24s, who came back to ATC assignments. By 1944 it became apparent that the large numbers of pilots and aircrew who had been thought necessary to win the war were overestimated, so many of the civilian instructor personnel at training bases were released for active duty as ATC pilots. At the same time, more and more military trained pilots were assigned to ATC as the war continued to turn in the Allies favor and there was less need for them in combat units.

When the war ended, Air Transport Command was the largest airline in the world, with routes that led literally all over it. But ATC had not developed a true military mission, and post-war plans left its future in doubt. Some military officers who had served in ATC felt the command should be converted into a national airline, while civilian airline personnel who went back to the airlines felt that the military's transport needs could be best served by contract with their employers. When the USAF was created as a separate service in 1947, a Military Air Transport Service was established to support the new Department of Defense, with responsbility for its support falling to the Department of the Air Force. MATS continued to function as a military airline until it was finally replaced by the Military Airlift Command in 1965. By that time military transport had advanced to the point that the C-141 "Starlifter" offered true military capabilities. After the Gulf War, MAC became Air Mobility Command, and now operates C-141s, C-5s and C-17s, along with the C-130 mission which evolved through the Troop Carrier Command. AMC also is responsible for issuing military contracts to the nation's airlines.

HUMP and ATC Links:

The Hump Page

C-One-Oh-Boom

Tonnage Tunner

Hump Book

The C-54 Skymaster

CAF Hump Display

Click Airlift History to return to Table of Contents page.


http://members.aol.com/SamBlu82/atc.html
Image

el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

ORIGINAL: m10bob

History of the U.S. 10th Air Force.:

MONDAY, 6 APRIL 1942

(10th Air Force): 10 DC-3's of Pan American Airways begin hauling 30,000 gallons of fuel and 500 gallons of lubricants from Calcutta to the airstrip at Asansol, India, completing the mission on the following day. This fuel, subsequently transferred via Dinjan, India to China, is for use by Lieutenant Colonel James H Doolittle's Tokyo raiders, already at sea aboard the aircraft carrier USS Hornet (CV-8).

http://www.pacificwrecks.com/60th/today/1942/4-42.html
(Just more fuel for the fire.)[:D]

First - note it didn't turn out to matter: Not one of the Doolittle raiders made it to Chinese bases where supply was possible.

Second - note the base of the op was Asanol, India. That might be a reasonable base - but IF you use it as a base in WITP - you are not going to get to China with supplies.

Third - I the number of planes involved was small. It would be difficult to abuse this in the form of delivering an airborne division or something like that. IF this unit ALSO did other ops that DID matter we might want to put it in.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

Be advised that, just before you began this thread, I added the N (for Naval) ATC to the game - on its historical dates - including one of the squadrons in Conus (there were three initially) - and ALL the squadrons of the South Pacific Combat Naval Air Transport Command. But this latter was entirely made of military units - Navy and Marine.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by el cid again »

Most of the ATC work is involved in making "free supplies" appear at map edge points. Also units appear at those points. Even more came by sea - but a significant part came by air. Another part of ATC work is abstractly in the game - when relief aircraft or pilots "instantly" teleport into your forward units. IF we put these units in separately we would essentially duplicate these things designed into the system.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: el cid again

Most of the ATC work is involved in making "free supplies" appear at map edge points. Also units appear at those points. Even more came by sea - but a significant part came by air. Another part of ATC work is abstractly in the game - when relief aircraft or pilots "instantly" teleport into your forward units. IF we put these units in separately we would essentially duplicate these things designed into the system.

Yeah, of course the game already represents supply coming in abstracly at the edges.
It looks like the "unit" I am seeking amounts to 10 planes, to provide transport,based at Calcutta from the very beginning.
The planes were used historically thruout India, down to Rangoon, and serviced the AVG as well.
Presently, there is no transport (by air) from the beginning.
Besides, if they get shot down thru misuse, it is extra points for the Japanese.
Again, not seaplanes, but the localized DC 2's and DC 3's, as represented, and in the roles provided in the above narratives.
You have a huge agenda, and I appreciate your consideration.
Image

User avatar
wdolson
Posts: 7689
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:56 pm
Location: Near Portland, OR

RE: Pan Am and China

Post by wdolson »

An interesting story, one of those CNAC DC-3s had it's wing damaged beyond repair by Japanese bombers before the US was in the war.  CNAC only had a spare DC-2 wing, which was shorter, but had the same mating joint.  They contacted Douglas who told them that putting a single DC-2 wing on a DC-3 was lunacy and essentially their warranty was void if they tried.  They needed to get the plane flying again, so they strapped the DC-2 wing to the bottom of another DC-3 and flew it to where the plane was grounded with passengers on board.  The DC-3 that ferried the wing continued to its destination.  CNAC mechanics installed the DC-2 wing and the DC-3 flew like that for a couple of years.  I believe it had some odd low speed handling characteristics, but it worked.

Bill
WIS Development Team
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”