Japanese Ordnance Material of WW II

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Mifune
Posts: 799
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Florida

Japanese Ordnance Material of WW II

Post by Mifune »

I found this site interesting and wanted to pass it on. This page covers Japanese AFV's and small arms. http://www.wlhoward.com/museum/id577.htm
Perennial Remedial Student of the Mike Solli School of Economics. One day I might graduate.
Dili
Posts: 4742
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 4:33 pm

RE: Japanese Ordnance Material of WW II

Post by Dili »

Nice one.
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: Japanese Ordnance Material of WW II

Post by el cid again »

This site is slightly more respectful of Japanese tanks than is normal in the West - but it has missed some salient points.

a) Japanese armor was DERIVED FROM Western vehicles - and in that sense does NOT differ from them in concept - but often was (as reverse enginering usually is) somewhat improved. Confusion arises because these vehicles were often used for a long time - and because terminology is misleading. Thus - a "tankette" in Japan is very similar to its Western counterparts - but by WWII we didn't call them "tankettes" any more - and in some cases they were no longer tracked.
No one thinks a Bren Carrier is silly - but a Japanese tankette is ridiculed. The concept was that this was to be an ammunition carrier - not a front line vehicle - and there was provision to carry ammunition boxes (or two soldiers) in the original form - at the rear. If you think of a Japanese "tankette" as an "ammo carrier", a Japanese "light tank" as a tracked armored car, and a Japanese "medium tank" as a light tank - and a Japanese "heavy tank" as a medium tank, the way they were used makes more sense.

b) Japanese armor led the world in development of diesel engines - and diesel engines for cold weather operation. This became virtually universal post WWII - but Japan developed it PRE WWII. Diesel is far less prone to fires and somewhat more fuel efficient. This was part of a broader trend to diesel in military vehicles - which Japan pioneered - and which eventually the world imitated. Civilian vehicles might use other fuels as well - coal gas for example. Yet another fuel technology - being investigated again now in the USA - was conversion of coal to a liquid fuel. Japanese vehicle technology was oriented toward reducing the requirement of petroleum distillates as a strategic requirement. It is at least an interesting concept - and might become much more so if the cost of gasoline and diesel continues to rise.

c) Japanese vehicles of all sorts were "self fueling" - or could be. By law ALL civilian vehicles had to be - and were.
But military vehicles could be - appropriately fitting. A number of schemes were used - the most common being a wood burning fuel conversion device mounted on the vehicle (which made a usable fuel).
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”