ORIGINAL: Zap
You see KG Erwin "once upon a time". Character and using natural talent only were part of the basis for judging a great man and player. In some fan circles, nowadays its just the numbers that count.
Two words Zap: Ty Cobb. As far as being an outstanding player, Cobb ranks way up there in the history of baseball. But "character" as you put it? Cobb was well known to be a pain to deal with. It is rumored that he sharpened his cleets so that he could spike basemen as he slide into bases. He was known to be a racist, assaulted a fan, publically whipped his son for getting bad grades at Yale, and in his later life was a heavy drinker (picked up for drunkeness a few times). Some would argue that these aspects of character added to his personality, but anyway you slice it, his numbers were good, but he was somewhat of a poor role model. Ironically though, post-career Cobb agreed with you, he felt players talent had degraded since his time on the field!
I feel the same way about Pete Rose, he is an iconic player, but a tarnished person. Darryl Strawberry too, one can barely think about his time at bat without thinking about his drug problems. While I agree with the above, that once a record is broken the numbers are the numbers, but the players themselves have to live with the fact that the fans will say "Sure, he broke Aaron's record, but he didn't do it without chemical aid." Statistics are statistics, but history often has its own way of evening out.
And to you Mets fans above... Ptttttttpt!

Everyone knows that there is only one team in NYC... the Yankees. Even if they suck (thank goodness they beat Tampa Bay the other day while I was at the Stadium... worst team in the league). What can I say, I live in the Bronx! (I'm a closet Dodgers fan, though)
SoM
"Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet!"
(Kill them all. God will know his own.)
-- Arnaud-Armaury, the Albigensian Crusade