RHS Standard Bomber Utility (and expanded EOS bomber utility)

Please post here for questions and discussion about scenario design and the game editor for WITP.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RHS Standard Bomber Utility (and expanded EOS bomber utility)

Post by el cid again »

The RHSEOS Bomber Utility was expanded by adding Seaplane bombers. This includes the unique M6A1 torpedo bomber for submarine use.
One bit of eratta existed in the original: The Ki-48 load was given in pounds vs kilograms - so the ratings for that aircraft are now more correct relatively speaking (and not impressive).

The utility gives most aircraft data, but only the summary ratings (unique to RHS) are given here:

Air Combat SR Bmr LR Bmr Nav Bmr LR NavBmr Combined Cost/Eff Designation
3 2 0 2 0 1 0.3 B5N2-Q
4 20 4 19 2 11 2.0 G4M3M34-Q
4 6 2 4 1 3 0.9 D3A2
9 29 10 19 6 16 4.5 D4Y2
1 2 0 2 0 1 0.3 B4Y1
3 4 1 4 0 2 0.7 B5M/B5N/Ki-47
6 10 2 9 1 6 1.6 B6N2
10 34 7 33 3 19 5.3 B7A2
2 1 0 0 0 0 0.1 E7K2
3 3 1 2 0 2 0.4 E13A1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 E14Y1
8 10 2 5 1 4 1.2 E16A1
2 10 2 10 1 6 1.1 G3M2/Ki-43
3 17 3 16 2 10 1.8 G4M1/Ki-50
3 22 4 21 2 12 2.3 G4M2m22
3 15 3 47 1 16 3.0 G4M2e&Okha
2 51 10 26 5 23 2.5 G5N3/Ki-68
4 87 24 52 15 45 4.9 G5N4/Ki-85
6 42 8 68 4 30 5.6 G7M1/Ki-124
6 369 74 184 37 166 18.4 G8N1/Ki-90
1 5 1 3 1 2 0.3 H6K4
4 49 10 25 5 22 2.5 H8K2
2 22 5 14 3 11 2.0 Ju-88A4/D4J4
3 4 0 7 0 31 5.7 Ju-88C6/D4J6
3 14 3 7 1 6 1.1 Ki-21 II
4 12 2 6 1 5 1.5 Ki-32/30
3 1 1 1 0 1 0.2 Ki-36
2 3 1 2 1 2 0.3 Ki-48 I
3 16 4 8 2 7 1.4 Ki-49 I
4 22 4 21 2 13 2.3 Ki-49 IIQ
5 3 1 2 1 2 0.5 Ki-51
4 28 6 14 3 13 2.3 Ki-67
3 57 12 29 6 26 4.8 Ki-74/C7T1
7 9 2 9 1 5 1.4 M6A1
5 27 5 25 3 15 2.8 P1Y1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Vichy P63.11
1 2 0 1 0 1 0.2 RTAF B-10
2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 RTAF V-935
el cid again
Posts: 16983
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:40 pm

RE: RHS Standard Bomber Utility

Post by el cid again »

The ratings for the newly issued Standard Bomber utility are given here. These aircraft appear in CVO and BBO family scenarios.

Air Combat SR Bmr LR Bmr Nav Bmr LR NavBmr Combined Cost/Eff Designation
4 6 2 4 1 3 0.9 D3A2
9 29 10 19 6 16 4.5 D4Y2
1 2 0 2 0 1 0.3 B4Y1
3 4 1 4 0 2 0.7 B5M/B5N
6 10 2 9 1 6 1.6 B6N2
10 34 7 33 3 19 5.3 B7A2
2 1 0 0 0 0 0.1 E7K2
2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 E8N2
3 3 1 2 0 2 0.4 E13A1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 E14Y1
8 10 2 5 1 4 1.2 E16A1
2 10 2 10 1 6 1.1 G3M2
3 17 3 16 2 10 1.8 G4M1
3 22 4 21 2 12 2.3 G4M2m22
3 15 3 47 1 16 3.0 G4M2e&Okha
6 369 74 184 37 166 18.4 G8N1
1 5 1 3 1 2 0.3 H6K4
4 49 10 25 5 22 2.5 H8K2
3 14 3 7 1 6 1.1 Ki-21 II
4 12 2 6 1 5 1.5 Ki-32/30
3 1 1 1 0 1 0.2 Ki-36
2 3 1 2 1 2 0.3 Ki-48 I
3 10 1 6 1 5 0.9 Ki-48 IIC
3 16 4 8 2 7 1.4 Ki-49 I
5 3 1 2 1 2 0.5 Ki-51
4 28 6 14 3 13 2.3 Ki-67
1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Ki-76
7 9 2 9 1 5 1.4 M6A1
5 27 5 25 3 15 2.8 P1Y1
0 1 0 0 0 0 0.1 Q1W1
1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Vichy P63.11
1 2 0 1 0 1 0.2 RTAF B-10
2 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 RTAF V-935

Note the E8N2 and Ki-76 join the Glen and Ki-36 as nearly worthless bombers.

The ratings are very sophisticated - reflecting the greater chance of delivery for a dive bomber - and the
below waterline delivery for torpedoes.
Post Reply

Return to “Scenario Design”