Name This AE...52

Gary Grigsby's strategic level wargame covering the entire War in the Pacific from 1941 to 1945 or beyond.

Moderators: Joel Billings, wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6083
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

Name This AE...52

Post by Brady »

???






Image
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Iridium »

Looks kinda like it might be a shot from the stern of the Akagi under the flight deck. Hard to tell though, that photo is horrible on the contrast.

EDIT: apparently it's my monitor that's bad on contrast...it looks better on another. Still rather bleak of anything I recognize beyond general lines.
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
castor troy
Posts: 14331
Joined: Mon Aug 23, 2004 10:17 am
Location: Austria

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by castor troy »

Akagi? Isn´t that a US CV in the far behind?[&:]
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Iridium »

ORIGINAL: castor troy

Akagi? Isn´t that a US CV in the far behind?[&:]

Honestly, upon my first look, I could barely tell anything from anything else beyond the girders holding the deck up.

If that CV is US? Maybe...doesn't have enough detail to show open sides though...Could be any decent sized CV from the way I look at it.

EDIT: You might be right though, if I recall correctly, the Akagi / Kaga pair had silly low angle batteries in these locations, which are not in the photo.
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Terminus »

Those are definitely Japs. I'd say we're on the Akagi, looking back at the Kaga and the Soryu.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Iridium »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Those are definitely Japs. I'd say we're on the Akagi, looking back at the Kaga and the Soryu.

It would have been so much easier to tell if it was the Soryu and Hiryu due to the opposite towers...
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Terminus »

Yeah, but then you can just set the Hiryu aside and call it as the Kaga (which I'm 99,9% certain is the nearer of the two), which then makes the farthest carrier the Soryu.
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
Iridium
Posts: 932
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 7:50 pm
Location: Jersey

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Iridium »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

Yeah, but then you can just set the Hiryu aside and call it as the Kaga (which I'm 99,9% certain is the nearer of the two), which then makes the farthest carrier the Soryu.

I buy that, makes sense anyhow, Akagi is the flag and faster than Kaga so who's in front? Akagi.
Yamato, IMO the best looking Battleship.
Image
"Hey, a packet of googly eyes! I'm so taking these." Hank Venture
User avatar
VSWG
Posts: 3217
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by VSWG »

Good to hear that these ships made it into AE... [;)]
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Terminus »

We haven't quite decided yet...[:'(]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
VSWG
Posts: 3217
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 5:04 pm
Location: Germany

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by VSWG »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

We haven't quite decided yet...[:'(]
Here's a thought: give the Japanese only 4 fleet carriers in Dec. 1941. The remaining carriers arrive only as replacements if one of those carriers is sunk. Call it "respawn"...

[:D]
Image
User avatar
Terminus
Posts: 39781
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 11:53 pm
Location: Denmark

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Terminus »

Sure... Just let me finish my last will and testament first...[:D]
We are all dreams of the Giant Space Butterfly.
User avatar
m10bob
Posts: 8583
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 9:09 pm
Location: Dismal Seepage Indiana

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by m10bob »

ORIGINAL: Terminus

We haven't quite decided yet...[:'(]


Oh yeah....there is always one!
Image

User avatar
mbatch729
Posts: 534
Joined: Wed May 23, 2001 8:00 am
Location: North Carolina

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by mbatch729 »

Quiet a few in this forum, actually. EVERYBODY's a comedian...
Later,
FC3(SW) Batch
USS Iowa
bigjoe96912
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 1:01 am

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by bigjoe96912 »

a unique Japanese Carrier picture that I had never seen before
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Cap Mandrake »

Akagi with Kaga and Soryu following as stated above. You can see the wake.

To me that makes it not the Pearl Harbor attack as they were arrayed in 2-carrier divisions (Akagi and Kaga where in one, Soryu in another). I guess it is possible a second division might have been that close upon the first?


I think we can safely assume it is before the second week of June '42 [:)]

It looks warm, the sun is low on the horizon and to the starboard. Something about the apparent leisurely attitude of the sailors says sunset, so I would say they are making a generally Southerly course. Darwin raid perhaps?

Come to think of it..I have no idea. [:'(] You may no resume your web surfing.
Image
User avatar
Local Yokel
Posts: 1494
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:55 pm
Location: Somerset, U.K.

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Local Yokel »

I think this photograph was taken in the course of the Hawaii Operation, and I'm confident was taken from the stern of Akagi, with Kaga as the nearer of the other two carriers visible.

Identification of the more distant carrier is a bit more difficult, because I've seen differing versions of the the formation adopted by KB. The Belote brothers have the carriers in two columns, one comprising Akagi, then Kaga, followed by Hiryu. I think that's wrong; it implies Carrier Div. 2 (the second most senior) was positioned at the rear of the formation. Clearly this picture does not show Hiryu at the rear, as both visible carriers have starboard side islands.

The more likely disposition is CarDiv's 1 and 2 alongside each other in two columns, with junior CarDiv 5 at the rear, in abreast formation. That makes the more distant carrier visible either Shokaku or Zuikaku, and my vote goes to Zuikaku.
Image
User avatar
Cap Mandrake
Posts: 20737
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 8:37 am
Location: Southern California

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Cap Mandrake »

I changed my mine. If this Kido Butai on the Pearl attack, I think the third in line is Zuikaku.

Here is pic of Zuikaku following Kaga in same. A frame from a motion picture taken from Akagi in "early Dec. 41" (note the sea state, btw)

Image

Some idea of the sea state on Dec 7.

Image
Image
User avatar
Brady
Posts: 6083
Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:48 pm
Location: Oregon,USA

RE: Name This AE...52

Post by Brady »

Akagi (forground), it is[:)]
 
Then:
 
Kaga, it is[:)]
 
Finialy:
 
Zuikaku, it is[:)]
Image


SCW Beta Support Team

Beta Team Member for:

WPO
PC
CF
AE
WiTE

Obi-wan Kenobi said it best: A lot of the reality we perceive depend on our point of view
Post Reply

Return to “War In The Pacific - Struggle Against Japan 1941 - 1945”