Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Commander – Napoleon at War is the second in a series of high level turn based strategy games. It spans the Napoleonic Wars from 1805 to 1815, allowing players to control France or the Coalitions against it through the entire period or in shorter scenarios. Easy to learn, with fun and addictive gameplay, this is a Napoleonic wargame in the style of the old "Panzer General".
Post Reply
GaryChildress
Posts: 6907
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by GaryChildress »

Knowing nothing about the Napoleonic period, what was the difference between light and heavy cavalry? Did they use different weapons? [&:]

Thanks.
xriz
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:41 pm

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by xriz »

I think it was a combination of outfitting, horse size/breed and how they were used
 
Heavy Cavalry were still armored with Cuirass (brest plate) and were given bigger horses, think Clydesdales vs. Mustangs and used or expect to use lances and charge enemy formations when needed along with swords.
 
Light Cavalry were un armored and given the lighter horses so they could ride faster and were used mainly as scouting, they were proably not issued lances and not realy expected to charge enemy formations but to attack lightly defened rear troops with sword and maybe musket, in this game artillary or damaged infantry are the best targets.
User avatar
berthier
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by berthier »

xriz is correct. The sole purpose of "heavy" cav was to break the enemy in battle. These cavalry were typically cuirassiers, heavy dragoons, etc. They were expensive to outfit and to maintain, took a long time to train but were devastating on the battlefield if used correctly. Light cav served multiple roles. They were used for scouting, skirmishing, screening the main armies movements from enemy observation, raiding, escort duties, pretty much everything. On the battlefield they were placed on the flanks in battle to watch the flanks, scout for enemy outflanking moves and to maintain contact with other formations. They could be used in the main battle line for pursuit of beaten formations or even thown in to charges - pretty much jack of all trades. Lancers are an interesting one. the French didn't have a lot (Russians had Cossacks who carried lances and Prussinas had Uhlans) and they were mainly used by them towards the end of the period. They had the famous polish lancers but also some line units which were present at Waterloo and did a lot of damage to the British cav who they counter charged once the British heavies had become "blown"...I could go on.....
daniel
User avatar
berthier
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Melbourne, Australia

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by berthier »

Ok so I will, in 1800 in France a cuirassier's horse cost 300F, a dragoon's 200F and light cav horses about 100F. In Austria to equip a cuirassier cost 3300crowns, a hussar 2800 and an infantryman 200. 
User avatar
Capt. Harlock
Posts: 5379
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by Capt. Harlock »

ORIGINAL: xriz

Light Cavalry were un armored and given the lighter horses so they could ride faster and were used mainly as scouting, they were proably not issued lances and not realy expected to charge enemy formations but to attack lightly defened rear troops with sword and maybe musket, in this game artillary or damaged infantry are the best targets.

Mind you, it's best to charge artillery from the side rather than going down the throat of the guns -- think Charge of the Light Brigade. (Which was originally supposed to go down a neighboring valley and hit the Russian position from the side.)
Civil war? What does that mean? Is there any foreign war? Isn't every war fought between men, between brothers?

--Victor Hugo
User avatar
Adam Parker
Posts: 1848
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:05 am
Location: Melbourne Australia

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by Adam Parker »

Light Cavalry:



Image
Attachments
LightCavalry.jpg
LightCavalry.jpg (100.47 KiB) Viewed 195 times
GaryChildress
Posts: 6907
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2005 3:41 pm
Location: The Divided Nations of Earth

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by GaryChildress »

I take it they employed dwarfs and midgets then. [:D]
Gloo
Posts: 261
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2001 8:00 am
Location: Chapelle-Guillaume
Contact:

RE: Heavy vs. Light Cavalry

Post by Gloo »

And a fierce one for sure ! [:D]
{:]]

"One ring to find them all..."
Post Reply

Return to “Commander - Napoleon at War”