Why not have Army HQs as part of reinforcements?

Adanac's Strategic level World War I grand campaign game designed by Frank Hunter

Moderator: SeanD

Post Reply
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

Why not have Army HQs as part of reinforcements?

Post by FM WarB »

Have them enter at historicl times, with only one Offensive apiece, regardless of theoreticl max. I know HQ offensive points drive this game, but would this suggestion hurt?
Top
FrankHunter
Posts: 2111
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:07 am

RE: Why not have Army HQs as part of reinforcements?

Post by FrankHunter »

But the HQs aren't historical, its the capability I try to represent not the physical HQs.
Top
FM WarB
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2008 4:40 pm

RE: Why not have Army HQs as part of reinforcements?

Post by FM WarB »

Thanks, Frank. I guess I should think of them as supply dumps, not headquarters in a chain of command.
Top
FrankHunter
Posts: 2111
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 6:07 am

RE: Why not have Army HQs as part of reinforcements?

Post by FrankHunter »

Yes, because they are there to fill two roles, supply and command.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Guns of August 1914 - 1918”