To bombard or not to bombard?

Share your gameplay tips, secret tactics and fabulous strategies with fellow gamers.

Moderators: wdolson, Don Bowen, mogami

Post Reply
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by rader »

Well, the war in China has ground to a screeching halt (actually it walways was, or it was the Chinese who were attacking).

On the front lines, do I wear down enemy strength by bombarding, or does it just make him stronger by giving him valuable experience (I'm Japan)?

I guess it would use his supplies (and mine) and create minor casualties. This is if I am on the defensive as Japan. Worth itto bombard or just all defend?

Thanks,

Andrew

User avatar
AirGriff
Posts: 701
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 5:05 pm

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by AirGriff »

It might depend on if you think he's going to attack you the next turn.  If you bombard, I believe some of your arty is not used to repel the attack.  So, If you think he's stayiing put for a while, then maybe bombard and keep his disruption up, but if you think he's attacking next turn, then hold your arty to repel it.  I believe your experience goes up with bombardments, as well, so that's an argument for frequent bombardments. 
Image
User avatar
Japan
Posts: 754
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 1:45 pm
Location: Heaven on Earth (Scandinavia of course)

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by Japan »

In China i dont think you need to worry,  just establish a good solid line and let the Chinese come to you.
If he bombard your Japanese troops, just let him. If it gets hevy and sustained, just send in a few new divitions, and pull out the ones disrupted, and ceap rotating them like that.
 
[8D]
 
 
AAR VIDEO
THE FIRST YEAR + THE SECOND YEAR
tm.asp?m=2133035&mpage=1&key=&
User avatar
rader
Posts: 1241
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:06 pm

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by rader »

But my questions was should I bombard him?
User avatar
Nomad
Posts: 7273
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2001 8:00 am
Location: West Yellowstone, Montana

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by Nomad »

I think yes, it burns his supply and disables his units.
User avatar
Mike Solli
Posts: 16641
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2000 8:00 am
Location: the flight deck of the Zuikaku

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by Mike Solli »

I bombard as much as possible in China (as the Japanese).  There is supply to spare for it and it helps keep the Chinese supressed (as well as causing some casualties).  If you leave the Chinese alone, you'll eventually see a 200k man steamroller pounce on you, usually where you least like it.  I think you need to keep the pressure on the Chinese to try and keep them at arms length.
Image
Created by the amazing Dixie
User avatar
Charbroiled
Posts: 1181
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:50 pm
Location: Oregon

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by Charbroiled »

Someone did a test about a year ago and showed that daily bombardments really have little effect.

However, there is one function where bombardments do have an "effect"....bombardment can disrupt the movement of a unit. In certain circumstances, if a unit is assigned to move out of a hex, but then gets bombarded, the miles moved will reset to "0". The only way to move a unit out of a hex being bombarded is to pick a base to move to and not a hex. When picking the base, you must also be sure to pick on the flag symbol itself and not on the area surrounding the flag.
"When I said I would run, I meant 'away' ". - Orange
Cathartes
Posts: 1585
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2001 10:00 am

RE: To bombard or not to bombard?

Post by Cathartes »

Maybe little effect in actually destroying enemy troops, but big bombardments = disruption/weakened AV = increased supply consumption. If an enemy unit(s) is cut off or in a position to draw minimal supply, bombardment is great way to set them up for an easy coup de gras.

Further, bombardment = increased experience for the troops doing the bombarding. 


Post Reply

Return to “The War Room”